Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
falserum
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
14 ms
·
151.
▲
by
falserum
3y ago
Note: this structure is for tax purposes. In the spirit of “Own nothing, control everything”.
152.
▲
by
falserum
3y ago
It’s not all or nothing. Most of negative sentiment is not “world would be better without chatgpt“, but “one must be very cautious and always validate the answer”. It’s valuable tool, but it has a LOT of hype, which led to things like peop
153.
▲
by
falserum
3y ago
s/Grain/huge rock/
154.
▲
by
falserum
3y ago
> why then did it take me 10 seconds yesterday It definitely took you more than 10 seconds, though I guess a bit of hyperbole does not hurt. You validated findings against other source, which is obligatory step with chat gpt.
155.
▲
by
falserum
3y ago
> You can do this to produce code without needing to know anything besides properties … Reminder, you started with this: > You can interact with the LLM using agents, feedback loops, and some scoring function on randomized test inputs
156.
▲
by
falserum
3y ago
Agree. It is a language model, so it’s best use is language things (emails, motivational letter, summaries) For everything else, you need to be enough of an expert to validate the output.
157.
▲
by
falserum
3y ago
Whole conversation chains automated with chat gpt on both ends.
158.
▲
by
falserum
3y ago
Gist was, that operator strongly believed hard break was always available.
159.
▲
by
falserum
3y ago
> Ignored by everyone in the Soviet scientific establishment and nuclear authorities. I don't know what's worse, a secret police intervention or a whole science and industry community ignoring safety concerns until it is too la
160.
▲
by
falserum
3y ago
Idea is very interesting and thought provoking way to get better appraisals, but it gives too much power to the single buyer over the owner. (E.g. One could force a competitor to incur either additional tax or cost of forced relocation)
161.
▲
by
falserum
3y ago
Usually it is the opposite mr. Cunningham.
162.
▲
by
falserum
3y ago
Rhetorical, but relevent, question: Will new measures help catch people with good opsec capabilities? I have doubts, that new measures will move the needle much.
163.
▲
by
falserum
3y ago
What about just staying with older version, if you don’t have capacity to upgrade?
164.
▲
by
falserum
3y ago
No expert either, but what you suggest is hypothesis. Article reports some new evidence that seem to support it. Not every seemingly obvious hypothesis is true. My personal favourite at-first-counterintuitive law of nature: in orbital mech
165.
▲
by
falserum
3y ago
Let me explain to you. Clearly superior example of finished software is from business perspective, where cost of additional development is below projected any additional profits.
166.
▲
by
falserum
3y ago
“I hate math” usually is shorthand for “I hate math lessons, and I don’t feel any need to learn it”.