falcor84

28 ms·

481.
by falcor84 9mo ago
I don't get it - if they're coming for me anyway, then why would I need to move my ass from my beach chair?
482.
by falcor84 9mo ago
Talking about quotes, I also absolutely loved this note at the end of the readme: > If this makes you grin, you are probably holding the torch.
483.
by falcor84 9mo ago
I was responding to: > It’s even worse than the bad old days of long compile times because at least then I could work on tests or something like that while I wait. To me it seems like the exact same context switching situation that it al
484.
by falcor84 9mo ago
> But with coding agents I feel like I need to be completely hands off because they might decide to touch literally any file in the repository. Why not just have another worktree?
485.
by falcor84 9mo ago
> it intensifies work, and shortens time to burnout On the bright side, that would address the employability crisis for new grads.
486.
by falcor84 9mo ago
Why? I don't recall HBR ever being at forefront of a change. It seems to me that they're just good at identifying a change when it's already widespread and giving it a catchy name, and an explanatory model that they themselve
487.
by falcor84 9mo ago
And that brings us back to square one - if everyone is a 100x engineer, then everyone's again a 1x engineer. Lewis Carroll nailed it with the Red Queen's Race.
488.
by falcor84 9mo ago
Like any medicine, it's something that is intended to be prescribed by doctors to be used under supervision, rather than just taken by people ad-hoc at a random dosage hoping for a miracle. And as for cure rather than suppression - yes
489.
by falcor84 9mo ago
What do you mean? I was always under the impression that archives are for accessing a copy when the original is hard to access - this seems like the perfect use case.
490.
by falcor84 9mo ago
This is the full tweet: > For those unaware, SpaceX has already shifted focus to building a self-growing city on the Moon, as we can potentially achieve that in less than 10 years, whereas Mars would take 20+ years. > The mission of S
491.
by falcor84 9mo ago
I'm not saying that it's a good idea, but the obvious way would be with evolution: Give each agent its own wallet, rewarding it for a job well done and penalizing it for a poor job. Then if it runs out of money, it's "ou
492.
by falcor84 9mo ago
How would that make them any more deterministic? I haven't yet met a deterministic human dev.
493.
by falcor84 9mo ago
I don't get this sentiment. If you don't want investors to give you any input, don't take money from investors. With a Claude Max subscription, it's cheaper than ever to develop a product entirely by yourself or with a c
494.
by falcor84 9mo ago
I'm working on a system where user requests queue up agentic runs that do a bit of analytical reasoning and then return a response to the user, and this interpreter can possibly help me significantly reduce the runtime of these jobs.
495.
by falcor84 9mo ago
For extremely rapid iteration - they can run a quick script with this in under 1ms - it removes a significant bottleneck, especially for math-heavy reasoning
496.
by falcor84 9mo ago
I'm not with you. I would absolutely love to be able to disable all of these antifeatures by sending a header rather than (at best) spend ages finding hidden settings or (at worst) having to use custom extensions or disable js entirely
497.
by falcor84 9mo ago
Wow, a start latency of 0.06ms
498.
by falcor84 9mo ago
Ok, yes, that's true, though my understanding is that it's not the GCC is not compliant, but rather that it includes extensions beyond the standard, which is allowed by the standard, which says (in section 4. Conformance): > A
499.
by falcor84 9mo ago
Here's the chain of the thread: >Opus 4.6 uncovers 500 zero-day flaws in open-source code >Just 100 from the 500 is from OpenClaw created by Opus 4.5 >Well, even then, that's enormous economic value, given OpenClaw's
500.
by falcor84 9mo ago
Robotics has been advancing very quickly recently. If we solve long-term AI action planning, I don't see any limitation to making it embodied.
501.
by falcor84 9mo ago
Sorry if it was unclear - I was talking about the economic value of finding the vulnerabilities, not the economic value of openclaw itself.
502.
by falcor84 9mo ago
Yes, serious. Even if openclaw is entirely useless (which I didn't think it is), it's still a good idea to harden it and make people's computers safer from attack, no? I don't see anyone objecting to fixing vulnerabiliti
503.
by falcor84 9mo ago
I am interested, it's been more than five minutes and it is a problem. Accessibility is not a PEBCAK issue.
504.
by falcor84 9mo ago
Well, even then, that's enormous economic value, given OpenClaw's massive adoption.
505.
by falcor84 9mo ago
I'm struggling to even parse the syntax of "WHATEVER LEADS TO REWARD COLLECTIVE HUMANS TO SURVIVE", but assuming that you're talking about resource allocation, my answer is UBI or something similar to it. We only need to
506.
by falcor84 9mo ago
They didn't "steal" open source code any more than I stole my copy of The Odyssey.
507.
by falcor84 9mo ago
> literally a text book task Generating a 99% compliant C compiler is not a textbook task in any university I've ever heard of. There's a vast difference between a toy compiler and one that can actually compile Linux and Doom.
508.
by falcor84 9mo ago
To the best of my knowledge, there's no Rust-based compiler that comes anywhere close to 99% on the GCC torture test suite, or able to compile Doom. So even if it saw the internals of GCC and a lot of other compilers, the ability to re
509.
by falcor84 9mo ago
Agreed, but the next step is of having an AI agent actually run the business and be able to get the business context it needs as a human would. Obviously we're not quite there, but with the rapid progress on benchmarks like Vending-Ben
510.
by falcor84 9mo ago
This was a very interesting ethnographic analysis, and I liked this part in the end: > If AIs are going to act weird, I hope we get to see them act weird when they’re still silly lobster-Redditors that can be shut down easily, and not wh

More ›