fahhem

7 ms·

61.
by fahhem 3y ago
Seems like you got bit by VS Code, which is why I avoided that dep too. Try devpod.sh, it's independent, has a cli that's working great for me, and you can 'ssh' into the container from your terminal so you don't ne
62.
by fahhem 3y ago
Author here. I'll try to clarify in the post, but I'm not locked into VS Code, I'm using devpod.sh which is independent of VS Code.
63.
Dev onboarding, then and now(blog.fahhem.com)
42 points by fahhem 3y ago|70 comments
64.
by fahhem 3y ago
This is a common talking point, but Israel never once offered a real two state solution. All offers had a "poison pill" that they knew would get rejected, but they offered it for this exact talking point, to say they offered peace
65.
by fahhem 3y ago
There is no evidence to that claim. One baby was killed on Oct 7th, which is horrible, but it was not in an oven, not in a pregnant woman, nor beheaded.
66.
by fahhem 3y ago
Samba is a protocol, Microsoft doesn't have any costs associated with more users of it. GP is asking about APNS, which involves Apple servers and therefore costs Apple to handle more requests, however minimal per individual request&#x2
67.
by fahhem 3y ago
It's well-known in these areas that these sales are done through ships in the Mediterranean. The same US warship that captured the Somalis last week (initially they claimed to have caught Yemenis) could be focusing on those ships that
68.
by fahhem 3y ago
That report is based on policing the likes and shares in social media accounts of teachers, not on what they taught the children or what they themselves did or wrote. Imagine that was done here (in the US), those teachers might get a talkin
69.
by fahhem 3y ago
The ads can be targeted to the publisher, so the hardware magazine's ads will likely all be hardware related, instead of related to whatever website you visited before it
70.
by fahhem 3y ago
I'd be happy to chat, though we'd likely come up with something unique to individuals so we're not wasting each other's time every year. Reach out to support@reviewable.io and mention this thread
71.
by fahhem 3y ago
This is a feature of Reviewable.io, there's a system file called Commits where you can comment on the commit titles and descriptions!
72.
by fahhem 3y ago
We're actually a small company and only 2 of us posted here, most of the other plugs of us are by users. piotrkaminski is the only other user here from the company
73.
by fahhem 3y ago
We have an on-prem edition that doesn't even phone home, so you don't have to rely on us for anything but updates.
74.
by fahhem 3y ago
We're still around and we've actually changed a lot. Our homepage is untouched (for now!) but you can check out our blog for proof of life :D http://blog.reviewable.io/
75.
Tracking Change(set)s in a Code Review(blog.reviewable.io)
6 points by fahhem 3y ago|1 comments
76.
by fahhem 3y ago
This topic came up today on the homepage, so I figured this post from 3 weeks ago could be relevant to folks!
77.
by fahhem 3y ago
Thanks, we heart you too :D
78.
by fahhem 3y ago
You're right, though I think that changed recently? I vaguely remember only the last force push showed up, but now I see more than one so :shrug:
79.
by fahhem 3y ago
I agree, we work on Reviewable, which uses those same blobs. However, we add tags to commits we're referencing, just in case someone at GitHub gets around to implementing garbage collection!
80.
by fahhem 3y ago
GitHub is a platform with dozens of tools, I think of it as a basic toolbox. It's great, but if you're hammering nails all day, you should invest in a nailgun. Doesn't mean you don't use the hammer or the wrench in your
81.
by fahhem 3y ago
Then sign up for Reviewable, which supports this (we called them revisions) http://blog.reviewable.io/tracking-changes-in-a-code-review Sorry for the shameless plug!
82.
by fahhem 3y ago
If your tool moves comments forward to newer changesets (ideally with some sort of code ensuring it's in the right place) then that's done automatically for you. Reviewable does this with an algorithm that ensures the code context
83.
by fahhem 3y ago
I agree, you want a basic tool for most users that just need the ability to review the code. But, once your team is doing something where the code quality is important, you'll want to switch to a better tool for the job (like Reviewabl
84.
by fahhem 3y ago
There's a ton of cli tools to automate maintaining a stack of PR's, with new ones coming out all the time. I've seen 'spr' for a long time, and recently there's graphite's and even aviator came out with &#
85.
by fahhem 3y ago
I truly believe that Reviewable is the best way to review code on GitHub, that's why I left a Head of Engineering post to come work here. Reviewable tracks code by revisions (aka changesets), not just the state of the git branch like G
86.
by fahhem 3y ago
I can't speak for CodeApprove, but Reviewable has file grouping capabilities so users can groups files based on anything they want (using a javascript function to do it)
87.
by fahhem 3y ago
Nice job Scott! We're seeing a lot of interest in this sort of thing at Reviewable.io (the best way to review code on GitHub ... manually :D) though most users have been hesitant to say "okay, then send all of our code to GPT-4&qu
88.
by fahhem 3y ago
Yep, I agree! I work at, and use, Reviewable ( https://reviewable.io ) and we're the best way to review code on GitHub because we've focused on making the whole process better at every step. We've improved diffing,
89.
by fahhem 3y ago
Thanks for the shoutout!
90.
by fahhem 3y ago
Thanks for the compliment masklinn! Paying users can turn off the button on PR descriptions (and free users have some flexibility on where it goes). I hope you understand we can't provide the service free and secretly :D

More ›