faceyspacey

21 ms·

121.
by faceyspacey 14y ago
I actually think I got it, and it's less impressive than I thought. Check this Screenshot: http://snapplr.com/hb27 ...they're essentially rendering the entire site in a headless browser like Phantom JS on their server and taking a screens
122.
by faceyspacey 14y ago
How do they get other web pages, given cross-domain constraints? Are they downloading the page on the server into a headless browser like Phantom JS, and then delivering the result to your browser to be manipulated using WebGL and Javascrip
123.
by faceyspacey 14y ago
funny thing is I've been wondering this all day myself.
124.
by faceyspacey 14y ago
Amadeus doesn't know what he's talkin about and hasn't analyzed Meteor. At least add some anecdotes that show you have analyzed the product to give you the right to be so harsh. Meteor is fantastic and has changed the way we should develop
125.
by faceyspacey 14y ago
he's suggesting we as tech startup entrepreneur type guys go out and imagine the actual solutions that can work across a number of problems based on the examples he's provided. I'm absolutely so surprised by the lack of imagination here at
126.
by faceyspacey 14y ago
you again, Russel ;). come on man. don't you get it: his point is to inspire the likes of us. It's up to you and I to do something with this. If you're not the one up to the task, fine, but stop putting forth a mindset that won't inspire ot
127.
by faceyspacey 14y ago
Russel your problem here is that we are looking at something that is about to change technology forever and you are taking the least productive path to discuss it. It's very clear to the majority of us that this is big! It's not tested simp