Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
fabulist
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
18 ms
·
121.
▲
by
fabulist
11y ago
> This article is posted every single year without fail[1] This article reports its publication date as: February 8, 2016: 9:27 AM ET You seem to be confusing it with this one: http://www.wsj.com/articles/americans-p
122.
▲
by
fabulist
11y ago
As long as we're making tangential recommendations and expecting to be reintroduced to things within 24 hours, I'd like to throw John Dies at the End into the ring.
123.
▲
by
fabulist
11y ago
Is this sarcasm?
124.
▲
by
fabulist
11y ago
You think the most common way to distribute drugs, weapons, and child porn is over Tor hidden services? I'm incredibly skeptical. Doubtless a significant percentage of child porn is distributed that way, but I'm under the impressi
125.
▲
by
fabulist
11y ago
Or zero.
126.
▲
by
fabulist
11y ago
Silence speaks volumes. I imagine they don't relish sending out eyewash cables, and use them them to misdirect conversations that are already happening at the agency. If the conversation never began, or was held behind closed doors, th
127.
▲
by
fabulist
11y ago
Personally I thought the detail about them forming pair bonds and cuddling was the most adorable thing I had ever heard about a bug. I'd save that species.
128.
▲
by
fabulist
11y ago
I'm imagining they detonated it so it wouldn't do something unexpected and potentially even more dangerous, but I came to this thread to ask because I wasn't sure.
129.
▲
by
fabulist
11y ago
It takes more than an attention-grabbing headline to make something clickbait. There is no real financial incentive here; they gave their talk a provocative title so people would show up. There are not misrepresenting the facts; you can get
130.
▲
by
fabulist
11y ago
Superphish showed us that Dell is clearly willing to do something of that nature, but the data the hackers are alleged to possess (shared secrets, support histories, ...) isn't the kind of thing you'd sell. There is no proof, but
131.
▲
by
fabulist
11y ago
Theres nothing wrong with presenting work at an intermediate stage. For instance, Chris Valasek and Charlie Miller presented their automotive research a year before they could control cars remotely[0]. They cobbled together the primitives y
132.
▲
by
fabulist
11y ago
"Instead of using the NIST recommended curve points [ScreenOS] uses self-generated basis points..." [0] The way I read this statement is that each device generates its own set of points. If this is the case, I don't see how i
133.
▲
by
fabulist
11y ago
Juniper hasn't released nearly enough details to conclude that this was related to Operation Aurora.
134.
▲
by
fabulist
11y ago
Unless someone tampered with the logs, of course.
135.
▲
by
fabulist
11y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientism
136.
▲
by
fabulist
11y ago
After some experimentation, it makes a file impossible to delete. Very clever, +1.
137.
▲
by
fabulist
11y ago
One images they observed the part number while attaching the bus sniffer.
138.
▲
by
fabulist
11y ago
The title is a quote from Fogerty, so I think it is appropriate. Additionally, I took the correct impression from "sounding like."
139.
▲
by
fabulist
11y ago
You might try wrapping a layer of strong tape at the part that keeps fraying while it is still functional to reinforce it.
140.
▲
by
fabulist
11y ago
You probably won't see this response, but in case you do: I see what you're saying, and I'm not going to criticize decisions people made more than a decade ago, but we've outgrown the robustness principle. You should not
141.
▲
by
fabulist
11y ago
> How many years ago was the Dell shopping cart bug (where a client could alter the price of an order)? Sounds like every third-party shopping cart I've ever looked at except FoxyCart, and even then this behavior is the default. (I&
142.
▲
by
fabulist
11y ago
You're totally right! Security practitioners hate the robustness principle! This article, for instance, contains a small rant. http://noxxi.de/research/http-evader-explained-8-borderline-... At a minimum, the robu
143.
▲
by
fabulist
11y ago
This would be the first time I've seen someone suggest gentrification makes things better.
144.
▲
by
fabulist
11y ago
It really bothers me that VICE Motherboard (I've not read much from their other sections), who markets themselves as a controversial, alternative news source, distinguishes themselves by publishing more reasonable and better researched
145.
▲
by
fabulist
11y ago
If you're a Telegram user who's cautious with what you say, assuming that anything you transmit could potentially be intercepted, you will certainly be more secure than a {Chat,Text}Secure user with complete faith in their technol
146.
▲
by
fabulist
11y ago
I found this headline quite refreshing, every other news source I've seen cover it discusses terrorists using Telegram and Signal to "go dark."
147.
▲
by
fabulist
11y ago
People don't like Telegram because they claim to be a company which cares deeply about security and privacy, offering a "200% secure" chat client, while blatantly ignoring the concerns of the security community. Doing things
148.
▲
by
fabulist
11y ago
I really doubt Washington Posts' sympathies lie with poor ISIS because they lost some social media accounts. If they were condemning anyone (which they weren't), it was Pavel Durov himself, not Telegram. This piece was about Durov
149.
▲
by
fabulist
11y ago
It's hard to tell the difference between "using with impunity" and "totally being monitored by organizations who don't wish to tip their hand." Neither is particularly more speculative than the other. Edit: ...
150.
▲
by
fabulist
11y ago
This thread seems to be generating a great deal of redundancy. If you're here to ask, "How come they were able to ban channels when Telegram is supposed to be private?", as sk4kerto mentioned channels are a feature for broadc
More ›