Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
f430
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
49 ms
·
421.
▲
by
f430
6y ago
I don't think you are naive at all regarding this but generally people see famous people, name dropping and due diligence goes out the window. There are people who take advantage of that and are very successful. Disgusting because it i
422.
▲
by
f430
6y ago
Do you think Plaid founders are going to jail?
423.
▲
by
f430
6y ago
Back when I used to run a web scraping shop, we had this exact request. I didn't know it was illegal at the time but we ultimately didn't do it because lot of people just want to pay as little as possible for scraping without cons
424.
▲
by
f430
6y ago
Oh man I can't believe they actually pulled this on a Canadian Bank. I tell my founders to always always fly straight or don't fly at all because if you cut corners or deceive, it will come back to you. Had they been honest and pl
425.
▲
by
f430
6y ago
> They made up some numbers and played with the math. It's conjecture, not research. Do you know what conjecture means?
426.
▲
by
f430
6y ago
One of the big reasons why some shops refuse to use Javascript on server side because of its unknown attack surface that is NPM. It's impossible to keep track of all of these libraries that can be written by anyone. Someone could hijac
427.
▲
by
f430
6y ago
> asymptomatic has such a miniscule amount of virus in their system that they're not infectious. https://www.advisory.com/daily-briefing/2021/01/11/asymptoma... 60% doesn't seem miniscule
428.
▲
by
f430
6y ago
I think this is the best answer out of all the replies.
429.
▲
by
f430
6y ago
so AWS is the arbitrator of truths and justice? When did we put the billionaires and monopolies in charge?
430.
▲
by
f430
6y ago
Hmm I hadn't considered that but how do you find out what tools were being used to produce the payload source code? How can you be certain? Could another adversary simply use the same tooling or perhaps it is shared to an allied nation
431.
▲
by
f430
6y ago
It kills the argument that Parler is exclusively used for organizing violence although the insurrection part is where they will have a lot of trouble with specifically because they chose the worst possible place.
432.
▲
by
f430
6y ago
The average engineer isn't an infosec expert and love automation so they found the weakest link in the chain: CI/CD
433.
▲
by
f430
6y ago
> Now everything points to Russia How do we know this is Russians? To my knowledge its very common practice to obfusticate origins before launching a campaign like this by washing through several different countries. You could leave stuf
434.
▲
by
f430
6y ago
This is the key excerpt, its quite shocking: Crowdstrike said Sunspot was written to be able to detect when it was installed on a SolarWinds developer system, and to lie in wait until specific Orion source code files were accessed by
435.
▲
by
f430
6y ago
Facebook and Twitter has been used to organize violence and overthrow governments too.
436.
▲
by
f430
6y ago
They were built in the early days of computing but now our smartphones are far more powerful than desktops of 5 to 10 years ago. Moore's law suggests that this trend will continue (unless purposefully downgrading performance to increas
437.
▲
by
f430
6y ago
In most other situations I would agree with you but this virus has a transmission R0 of 6!!! [1] This means even if you block 40% that remaining 60% that slipped by will overwhelm your medical infrastructure like what's happening in Ja
438.
▲
by
f430
6y ago
It claimed Parler was exclusively used for violence, the burden of proof is on them. All Parler's lawyer need to do is show them the exact same vitrol on Twitter to highlight how shaky Amazon's argument is. I don't expect a f
439.
▲
by
f430
6y ago
It isn't even 80% effective from the scientific journals I've read last year, the best they can do is 40% and lower, I think there is some inherent limitation in its accuracy. I'd like to point out that many countries aren&#x
440.
▲
by
f430
6y ago
> Parler was a hate site Have you seen Twitter, Reddit? It's filled with hate, conspiracy, radicalization and racism. It's astounding how quickly people fall back to their dfault political leanings and stop being objective. If
441.
▲
by
f430
6y ago
Are these PCR based tests? What is the accuracy rate? I was told it is far from 100%. So is it possible that someone might test negative but then is actually asymptomatic? This is exactly what happened last year in South Korea. People were
442.
▲
by
f430
6y ago
> BLM movement was present in the mob that attacked capitol hill. You don't find this odd at all?
443.
▲
by
f430
6y ago
wait so you keep most of your money on something like Interactive Brokers??? I guess when they give you better rates than any retail banks this makes sense.... but I'd feel nervous even with 2FA.
444.
▲
by
f430
6y ago
> less liquidity THIS. THIS. THIS. I remember calling Interactive Brokers panicking because I couldn't dump my position since there was no counter party at the deep OTM strike.
445.
▲
by
f430
6y ago
let me take a guess you can tell me if I'm warm or cold. assuming you risk 10% on your broker's account with 90% tied up in fixed income or t-bills or stocks. assuming you stand to make 100,000 USD per month selling far OTM option
446.
▲
by
f430
6y ago
Reading his post reminds me of the fund manager who said he sold all his positions back in 2000 when he found his grandma was buying stocks.
447.
▲
by
f430
6y ago
but when you sell options you are betting that the stock won't move towards the direction described in the option because if it does you are going to be margin called by your broker. I don't know exactly how it happened but someon
448.
▲
by
f430
6y ago
I think he means that deep OTM is cheaper and you can buy more of it compared to what you would with ITM or near strike options. So yes if you think Tesla is going to be $1000 in a few weeks and it moves towards that direction but not enoug
449.
▲
by
f430
6y ago
yeah so if your options are ITM then your stock doesn't need to move that much to profit but the downside is its very expensive. OTM is cheaper but much more riskier because your stock has to travel further. No you would leverage more
450.
▲
by
f430
6y ago
as the distance from the current market price increases, the rule of thumb is that it becomes cheaper because the probability of hitting that strike is a lot lower supposedly. I've read money managers use far OTM options to hedge again
More ›