f33d5173

10 ms·

151.
by f33d5173 11mo ago
>But I think that this website is being hyperbolic Intentionally in a humourous way, yes
152.
by f33d5173 11mo ago
>I would think most non technical users would just use a different browser. I would think most users would ignore the features they don't like? Idgi
153.
by f33d5173 11mo ago
Smaller platforms are worse at optimizing for engagement. It's one of those weird situations where it's a good idea precisely because it's economically inefficient.
154.
by f33d5173 11mo ago
That will be nice, because right now 64GB of ram is $500
155.
by f33d5173 11mo ago
Forbidding things works. People drank less during prohibition, and they do less drugs than they would were they legalized. Hence there is no serious proposal to legalize most hard drugs
156.
by f33d5173 11mo ago
They had specific complaints. Either say, "we're willing to work to change the things that you're complaining about", or say, "sorry, we're not going to change those things". The wishy washy bullshit they
157.
by f33d5173 1y ago
It really isn't a promising idea at all. Llms arem't "there" yet with respect to this sort of thing. Having an editor is totally infeasible, at that point you might as well have the humans write the articles.
158.
by f33d5173 1y ago
The people with the know how to use such a tool are more likely to use a swiss army knife tool than a specialized one off tool. The article mentions someone using windows photo viewer to do the conversion.
159.
by f33d5173 1y ago
> That’s not always a possibility. The solution in such cases can't reasonably be "everybody around the world learns to download one particular tool to fix things". In your example, the two reasonable solutions are either
160.
by f33d5173 1y ago
As soon as one of them figures it out, they tell their friends, who tell their friends, and so on until all of them know.
161.
by f33d5173 1y ago
Closing 1% of accounts instead of .1% of accounts for kyc reasons won't affect your revenue enough to matter to the stock market.
162.
by f33d5173 1y ago
The issue is that downloading a software, for most people, implies an investment in the task the software does that is unlikely to be paid off if it only does a single simple task. If I'm going out of my way to download something, then
163.
by f33d5173 1y ago
People want features, and they're willing to learn complicated UIs to get them. A software that has hyper simplified options has a very limited audience. Take his example: we have somebody who has somehow obtained a "weird" v
164.
by f33d5173 1y ago
Because the owners of those devices are paying them.
165.
by f33d5173 1y ago
It isn't that it's impossible, but that it would take significantly more resources to accomplish the same thing.
166.
by f33d5173 1y ago
That may be what they mean, but it is a sufficiently dubious interpretation that one can't reasonably use it to obtain the funding unless clarification is provided by the administration.
167.
by f33d5173 1y ago
"Or" means at least one of multiple alternatives. Alteratives contrast with each other, they differ. Of course, the original author could be repeating the same thing for emphasis, but more likely they are saying two different thin
168.
by f33d5173 1y ago
According to tfa they're based in sweden
169.
by f33d5173 1y ago
Do zealots usually know that they're zealots? Food for thought.
170.
by f33d5173 1y ago
> wouldn’t be seeking to make a quick buck selling ads against deep fake videos This isn't a money making venture for them, and you basically admitted as much. They poured no doubt massive amounts of money into developing this and h
171.
by f33d5173 1y ago
Vision is how humans see text. So text must have built in adaptations to protect from visual noise. For example, two words that look similar must never appear in similar contexts, or else they would be conflated. Hence we can safely reduce
172.
by f33d5173 1y ago
The validity of a sample size has nothing to do with the size of the set it's drawn from. 136 is a reasonable sample size, 25 is considered the minimum for a yes/no question.
173.
by f33d5173 1y ago
The china point is interesting because it's false. Google doesn't censor their results in china. There was a five year period some 20 years ago where they did, but prior to that period, and after that period, they didn't. Chi
174.
by f33d5173 1y ago
Apple doesn't demand ideological conformity from news oganizations before letting their reporters in, no.
175.
by f33d5173 1y ago
There are many things I would trust an AI with, but my taxes are not one of them.
176.
by f33d5173 1y ago
It might have been down when you checked, but it's working (if slow) now, and the git shows a commit as of 2 days ago. At the time of my comment I checked the mailing list and saw messages marked "patch" or somesuch as of a f
177.
by f33d5173 1y ago
That is by no means the most recent message to the list, I don't see what causes you to claim it's abandoned.
178.
by f33d5173 1y ago
> declares himself ‘politically homeless’ Could have saved me a click by quoting that
179.
by f33d5173 1y ago
I'm struggling to understand how you interpreted the GP to be in contradiction with you, unless you are just reinforcing what they said?
180.
by f33d5173 1y ago
It would be interesting if instead you added a syntax whereby a module could declare that it supported lazy importing. Maybe even after running some code with side effects that couldn't be done lazily. For one thing, this would have a

More ›