f311a

4 ms·

31.
by f311a 2mo ago
It takes years to test it thoroughly in real environments. You don't want your data to be silently corrupted.
32.
by f311a 2mo ago
What's the reason for it? Does not make a lot of sense to keep all the commits elsewhere
33.
by f311a 2mo ago
Regexes are pretty slow, though.
34.
by f311a 2mo ago
Unfortunately, simple URL parsing breaks on so many things. There is a reason on why every URL parsing library is at least a few thousand LOCs. One common way to test it is just to pass ipv6 url: http://[f021:d981:b487:e57d:193e:5
35.
by f311a 2mo ago
You can do this using fn button, without moving your hand every time you need to press them. It's very convenient, when your hand don't move at all and can reach every button.
36.
by f311a 2mo ago
Why do you need screenshot button for programming? How many times do you press it? You can just use fn button for that. People are programming on a 36-key keyboards just fine and they don't miss any keys. It's easier to press fn
37.
by f311a 2mo ago
There are a lot of subtle bugs. I'm on macOS too, but perhaps my workflow is unusual? Every time I open it, I find small bugs. There are so many features that it's hard to maintain them, I guess. For example, a lot of disable butt
38.
by f311a 2mo ago
This does not sound fun. It's better to work on your side projects with manual coding. You will learn more. Retyping things is inefficient for learning. It's like trying to retype calculus solutions — you don't learn from it.
39.
by f311a 2mo ago
Of course they are. I'm not even a native speaker. I read the whole thing and it was my impression.
40.
by f311a 2mo ago
It does not matter which prompt you use. Even a long article with a small input (of what to write) will include weird details and structure. People tried to fool Pangram by using custom prompts and instant feedback (rewrite until it passes)
41.
by f311a 2mo ago
It will, there is no doubt. But look at the first paragraph of the article: > The writing was on the wall, and now the writing is everywhere. Literally. Artificial Intelligence is writing about as well as humans — at least well en
42.
by f311a 2mo ago
That's true, but I can still tell if a big article was mostly written by AI. The author talks about writing cheap stories, but right now, you can't do this. Cheap stories are pretty bad, because there is very little human effort
43.
by f311a 2mo ago
> People are going to eventually figure out how to polish and refine the usage and outputs so you cant even tell it is AI. Personally, I'm gonna go offline after this and meet more people. One of the reasons I read comments is becau
44.
by f311a 2mo ago
The model is already up on Opencode, but they require a consent to use Chinese datacenters.
45.
by f311a 2mo ago
This is a well-known author, but how come he thinks AI is better at writing? AI writing makes me vomit. Also, I think he's too enthusiastic about the future of readers. In my opinion, reading books will be a very rare hobby pretty soon
46.
by f311a 2mo ago
I do Python, Go and Rust. Go works the best, I would say Python is worse than Go. Rust works perfectly fine, but when I use Rust, I usually pay closer attention to performance, so I have to guide it a bit, to improve cache locality, use sim
47.
by f311a 2mo ago
I've been driving flash model for 90% of my tasks. It's better than pro (for unknown reasons), very cheap and fast. I try to keep changes under 1000 lines and drive architectural decisions myself, barely notice any difference comp
48.
by f311a 2mo ago
Personal blogs are not a business, usually.
49.
by f311a 2mo ago
There is PR somewhere in the mosh repo to support block cursor. Just build it manually. Mosh is abandoned, unfortunately.
50.
by f311a 2mo ago
> no one will visit your website. Yep, let's suppose an average HN user reads 30-100 articles a month on independent websites (personal domains) posted on HN. Out of 100, he probably subscribes to 0-2 at best (via RSS/e-mail).
51.
by f311a 2mo ago
Substack gives a really nice exposure though, unlike medium and other platforms. It's very hard to gain readers now on independent websites. Google search is dead (very few people now search for tech content), social media platforms pe
52.
by f311a 2mo ago
> less training competition I think you meant less research and experiments in big labs because they don't get all the AI money. Training is expensive, but they also have more than 10 000 of employees combined and they cost a lot o
53.
by f311a 3mo ago
I think at this point any attempt to prevent it will fail. AI code is almost everywhere, even in projects that were against it 6 months ago.
54.
by f311a 3mo ago
Historically, a lot vulnerabilities in PHP projects were because of PHP itself. Things like register_globals, remote includes/reads using functions that supposed to read local data and so on.
55.
by f311a 3mo ago
They would not catch it, it requires combining multiple vulns.
56.
by f311a 3mo ago
Yet the most viewed questions are about how to undo git commit, how to sort an array, how to select stuff in jquery, how to group by in SQL and so on. General questions about programming languages, SQL and git don't change that much.
57.
by f311a 3mo ago
The graph shows questions, at some point they saturate, 90% of the stuff is answered. New frameworks contribute to the majority of the new questions.
58.
by f311a 3mo ago
Yeah, I hate the LLM wording too
59.
by f311a 3mo ago
> But there are also really good ones - so I can't afford to not take actual look at each, but it gets tiring and we need a solution. There is not easy solution, the landscape has changed and if care about security, you just need t
60.
by f311a 3mo ago
Google Chrome used to report visited pages back to Google, not sure if this still the case. Also, Google Analytics can see visited pages and Google uses it. Finding domains is easy, everybody uses CTL to find them.

More ›