f2n

20 ms·

91.
by f2n 9y ago
>If you have an account and you're participating in a project in any way through github.com, you're part of its social network. What part of GitHub does this person have a problem with? It's entirely unclear what they mean
92.
by f2n 9y ago
I wonder how long that will last until GitHub bans them for (presumably) massive amount of spam. The fact that it's PRs only, not just issues, makes it a bit harder, but I can't imagine it'd be that hard to abuse
93.
by f2n 9y ago
I was unaware of the SSDP component of that project, but it seems to require having the Physical Web app installed. Their BTLE beacons work on Android devices without anything special installed on the client. Maybe the SSDP does work on sto
94.
by f2n 9y ago
The original title, "Facebook and Google Say They Need More Time to Comply with Seattle’s Election Transparency Law", is longer than HN will let me submit but IMO the removal of the word "more" is important. Not sure if
95.
Facebook, Google Ask for Time to Comply with Seattle's Election Transparency Law(thestranger.com)
3 points by f2n 9y ago|1 comments
96.
by f2n 9y ago
>most residential broad band contract prohibit sharing of service in that way Or just ignore that and don't tell them. as long as you're not doing this as a business or at large scale I couldn't possibly imagine they would
97.
by f2n 9y ago
So a closed source electron app? No thanks...
98.
NVIDIA GeForce driver deployment in datacenters is forbidden now(nvidia.com)
358 points by f2n 9y ago|200 comments
99.
by f2n 9y ago
Sure, but there's no legal requirement for them to notify me that such behavior is occurring. And in the case of this article, it's not exactly something you have the option not to participate in. I guess my point is that is shoul
100.
by f2n 9y ago
Invasive facial recognition in physical places seems to be the future. A nightclub I walk by on my way to work has a sign up outside stating that they're operating facial recognition cameras. At least they disclose it, I suspect many m
101.
by f2n 9y ago
Per their twitter, "Coinbase employees have been prohibited from trading in Bitcoin Cash for several weeks." https://twitter.com/coinbase/status/943290391419174912
102.
by f2n 9y ago
Okay, ignore the people saying bittorrent isn't illegal: Who cares that it's illegal?
103.
by f2n 9y ago
Meanwhile, bittorrent is completely free and requires absolutely no subscription.
104.
Introducing Vireo: A Lightweight and Versatile Video Processing Library(blog.twitter.com)
61 points by f2n 9y ago|8 comments
105.
We All Face Rejection(rejected.us)
1 points by f2n 9y ago|1 comments
106.
by f2n 9y ago
The people doing random things with fake .dev domains were going to get bit in the ass one way or another. You can't just make up your own domain and hope no one ever does anything conflicting with it.
107.
by f2n 9y ago
It's moving that direction. As it stands, any website can opt-in to this behavior for future visitors with HSTS[0], or even for first time visitors with HSTS preload[1]. And Google has been doing HSTS preload on their .google TLD for s
108.
by f2n 9y ago
And if you aren't familiar with the details of how web browsers work (eg most people who use them), you would have no idea something was wrong. Not to mention potential problems such as http://stripe.ian.sh
109.
HTTPS on Your Landing Page Is Important(troyhunt.com)
639 points by f2n 9y ago|288 comments
110.
by f2n 9y ago
It's not terribly complicated JavaScript. A pop-behind is generally done by calling Window.open() to open a new window, then Window.focus() to re-focus the original window. Another method I've seen is opening a pop-up with the ori
111.
by f2n 9y ago
What do they do to decide if a user if real or fake? I am not remotely surprised that none of them work well
112.
by f2n 9y ago
>Adam Simmons, the VP of content and marketing for DingIt, told BuzzFeed News that the site uses “4 independent traffic verification tools that monitor each view on our video player” and prevents any fraudulent traffic from viewing conte
113.
by f2n 9y ago
Non-neutral wireless ISPs have always been legal in the US (IIRC). T-Mobile actively advertises their non-neutrality as a feature (eg "Binge On", where approved video streaming sites are zero-rated).
114.
Introducing Appsperiments: Exploring the Potentials of Mobile Photography(research.googleblog.com)
1 points by f2n 9y ago|0 comments