Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
f1shy
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
28 ms
·
511.
▲
by
f1shy
1y ago
Specially the ones with force of law
512.
▲
by
f1shy
1y ago
Pretty snarky and useless comment. It is clear I mean also, for example, noot use BW for that.
513.
▲
by
f1shy
1y ago
Well common lisp has it.
514.
▲
by
f1shy
1y ago
DC comes with another 1000 problems. It wouldn’t be any better, really.
515.
▲
by
f1shy
1y ago
I think the critique here is not directed to 1 individual, the guy who actually wrotw the code. That would be ok, can happen. Here we are talking about the most valued company in the world, which hopefully has many architects, designers and
516.
▲
by
f1shy
1y ago
What's wrong with checking for updates upon start once (and cache per day) For me that would also be wrong, if I cannot disable it in the configuration. I do bot want to extend startup time.
517.
▲
by
f1shy
1y ago
Germany?
518.
▲
by
f1shy
1y ago
Yes. I known at least one Motorola phone which had a co-processor for Java (not Jazelle)
519.
▲
by
f1shy
1y ago
No. There where Motorola phones with Motorola processors with Java Co-Processor. Not Jazelle.
520.
▲
by
f1shy
1y ago
AFAIK, one reason is that if you use "eval()" anywhere you need already a whole python compiler shipped with your program. So, compile is not different as shipping the code with the interpreter.
521.
▲
by
f1shy
1y ago
When the RISC processors were available (for the same reason RISC started to grow) it was better to just compile to ASM.
522.
▲
by
f1shy
1y ago
Wait. It was pretty well known how to make compilers for Lisp, and they were not bad. There were some little parts of some lisps (number tower, overflow to bignum, rationals) which was problematic (and still is today, if you do not have cus
523.
▲
by
f1shy
1y ago
I understand that is the reason Lisp Machines were dropped (even in the time where Lisp was still a very good seen language). At least I understand so in the SICP videos, like in 1986 it was already clear it was much better to compile to AS
524.
▲
by
f1shy
1y ago
Well, runing python on Raspian, you could toggle a pin at maximum a couple of KHz, not near the 2 MHz you can do with this project. Also it claims predictability, so I assume the time jitter is much less, which is a very important parameter
525.
▲
by
f1shy
1y ago
Well it really does not run CPython, but CPython bytecode, compiled down to an assembler. Granted, a very specific, tailored assembler, but still. Anyway, the project is mega-cool, and very useful (in some specific applications). Is just th
526.
▲
by
f1shy
1y ago
Should be called enhancing?
527.
▲
Key Takeaways from CATL's Naxtra Sodium-Ion Battery Launch
(batterytechonline.com)
20 points
by
f1shy
2y ago
|
1 comments
528.
▲
by
f1shy
2y ago
I saw always intel as a HW company making terribly bad SW. Anywhere I saw intel SW I would run away. Lately I used a big open source library from them, which is standard in the embedded space. Work great, but if you look the code you will b
529.
▲
by
f1shy
2y ago
If you parse things with structure, and the structure is unknown in advance. In C(++) you have to generate all dynamically, and is very complex. In other systems, you can just read the object, and the structure comes with it.
530.
▲
by
f1shy
2y ago
That has a name: Turing tarpit.
531.
▲
by
f1shy
2y ago
Yes. Regex tend to become rather fast write only. One solution is commenting, but is still complex. What I like to do now (in C) is define parts of it. Just a crude example to get the idea: // STRing: matches anything inside
532.
▲
by
f1shy
2y ago
I disagree. First of all, you can write a compiler for any existing language. But second, inhave experience writing compilers and interpreters. For me the hardest was always to give good information/feedback on errors. Because the comp
533.
▲
by
f1shy
2y ago
Which is in Borges words "a long allegory of insomnia" :)
534.
▲
by
f1shy
2y ago
> Pretty much everything he wrote was short, <20 pages, and so it's really easy to sit down and read one of his stories over a lunch break. Yes, his writings are short, but man they are dense! To anyone who cares, do this exercis
535.
▲
The Most Controversial Rule in Math [video]
(youtube.com)
3 points
by
f1shy
2y ago
|
0 comments
536.
▲
by
f1shy
2y ago
I‘m pretty sure it‘s from a region in the wotld were weather is very presictable, typically good, and people go out woth kids only in nice days, because there are so many.
537.
▲
Why Are Beach Holes So Deadly?Ja [video]
(youtube.com)
2 points
by
f1shy
2y ago
|
0 comments
538.
▲
by
f1shy
2y ago
It is pseudoscience, as they speak as if it was science (made categorical affirmations of what is better and worst for the education), but there is not science behind it. The cult is more controversial. But as long as people believe somethi
539.
▲
by
f1shy
2y ago
I second this motion. Technology is just a tool. It can be wisely used or not. Just forbidding it, is not wise in my opinion. You have to be careful to use it properly, or course. Also let me drop the thought here, that Rudolf Steiner, like
540.
▲
Most Common Pain Relief Drug May Induce Risky Behavior, Study Finds
(sciencealert.com)
4 points
by
f1shy
2y ago
|
0 comments
More ›