f055

18 ms·

181.
by f055 12y ago
I have the same effect on Safari for Mac. This is lame.
182.
by f055 12y ago
Disintegration! into pieces spread around gmail, drive and YT. That's probably what'll happen :)
183.
by f055 12y ago
So they got to a meeting and said: "Listen guys, if allowing nick names won't jumpstart Google+ then I don't know what will. It's either this or we'll close the damn thing." 18 months from now, we'll read
184.
by f055 12y ago
Erm.. Clicking any physical button on iPhone will snooze the alarm. Swiping will turn it off. I always click without looking, never ever had the same problems as the author. They probably should remove touch snooze completely, and just rely
185.
by f055 12y ago
More likely, regex search has the power only allowed in the paid Google Search API. And Google knows the value of its search data.
186.
Electric Wars(medium.com)
1 points by f055 12y ago|0 comments
187.
by f055 13y ago
What about the people who logged in via Facebook? (i think they don't setup passwords) Are access tokens compromised?
188.
by f055 13y ago
IMO responsiveness should have nothing to do with JavaScript, otherwise you're doing it wrong.
189.
by f055 13y ago
Yeah well, the person has himself to blame. Either be identifiable or anonymous. Don't use private email and expect to be untraceable. That's just mad.
190.
by f055 13y ago
I don't get it, if your email address is so private then why you share it with 3rd parties? Also, why would your email address be so private if the spam filters are so efficient nowadays, what's the harm in having a public email a
191.
by f055 13y ago
Mother Nature should sue the hell out of these businesses, she was after all the maker of all the seeds :P
192.
by f055 13y ago
"Someone reminded me I once said «Greed is good». Now it seems it's legal. Because everyone is drinking the same Kool Aid."
193.
by f055 13y ago
AKA Supreme Administrative Court of Poland. The irony :) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Administrative_Court_o...
194.
by f055 13y ago
It would be nice if you used GitHub properly and put the source code in the actual project. Thanks!
195.
The Future of Programming(vimeo.com)
2 points by f055 13y ago|0 comments
196.
by f055 13y ago
FYI I wouldn't post it but @jack followed this so it has some street cred. On another note, HN seems to be case-sensitive in regards to submitted URLs, letting through duplicates: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=66
197.
Xerox scanners/copiers randomly alter numbers in scanned documents(dkriesel.com)
1 points by f055 13y ago|0 comments
198.
by f055 13y ago
Somebody got too excited - this is a feature, not a flaw. Also, it's getting boring, these lock screen "hacks" that half the time are intentional behaviours. True hack would be accessing your phone remotely. If you at any poi
199.
by f055 13y ago
"this is almost a parody of how modern web dev innovation HTML5/JS/CSS are so far behind the technology that actually exists in the world today (this was originally created in 1977)" That's a weird opinion. The orig
200.
by f055 13y ago
Government isn't some abstract being - it's people. Some of whom were elected by the majority of other people. So as usual, people did this to people. We are all accountable. The question is, do we really want to change things?
201.
by f055 13y ago
Design trends are just this - trends. Next year the future of the web will be very different.
202.
by f055 13y ago
I'd rather teach them how to swim when they are young.
203.
by f055 13y ago
Good point. But what if you earned $20k? The problem here is, you would have to go straight from $0 to at least $24k to have incentive to work. Anything less is just not worth the hassle, if you get $12k for nothing. And that creates a prob
204.
by f055 13y ago
I understand your point and you are quite right that if an exceptional individual has given space to pursue his passion without the worries of "making a living", it's awesome and they can blossom. But for general population,
205.
by f055 13y ago
Let me explain: in a communist country, people had various jobs. Each job had a different salary. But everyone had a job, everybody had income. So, if you asked anyone "Do you earn at least $100?" - all would say "Yes".
206.
by f055 13y ago
Not at all, not static. I'm just saying you cannot give people free money and not take that money from somewhere else. FED has been doing this, the quantitative easing, for some time now, but it's not feasible in the long run. Wea
207.
by f055 13y ago
It will make a lot more difference to those who are wealthy as well. But not in a good way. USA Inc. with every citizen as shareholder would work like this: I earn $100K/y, my neighbour just $0/y. I pay $20K in taxes, he pays none
208.
by f055 13y ago
I don't pose for anything, I'm just saying what is logical. 2+2 != 5. And sorry for this heresy I committed by not writing Karl's surname properly - force of habit, this is how we write his surname in Poland. Now does it chan
209.
by f055 13y ago
1) If I have $0 and you have $100 and we both get $1000, you are still $100 richer than me. Also, if you say that purchasing power of the rich decreases, you are admitting to inflation. If I have $10,000 and can buy 20 laptops, but after th
210.
by f055 13y ago
I can't comment on your reply because it lacks any argument against my post. Tell me where I'm wrong. But what I can tell you is that if you give $1,000 per month to every adult in US without any requirement, then: 1) you might as

More ›