explaininjs

12 ms·

91.
by explaininjs 3y ago
Also, I fear you do not really understand anything the Bible really says – despite your love for the Greek – if you think European "anti-semitism" (a phrase invented by the nazis to "scientificize" their hatred which we
92.
by explaininjs 3y ago
Has it been? I think it's pretty universally believed that he was sentenced despite having committed no crimes and died sinless. He was tried for promoting not paying taxes and was judged to have not done so. There's really no roo
93.
by explaininjs 3y ago
You're projecting hatred into a simple historical account, re-evaluate your biases. The sources you think are helping your point are not, BTW. Which is as one would expect, given your point is basically: "This crowd of people refe
94.
by explaininjs 3y ago
One of the most central themes in Christianity is that these folks were lying through their teeth in oder to falsely convict Jesus, and they knew it. That's what makes it the story of the individual who did no wrong being falsely put t
95.
by explaininjs 3y ago
God is not concerned with trivialities of coinage. Indeed it is explicitly stated that `No one can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one and love the other; or else he will be devoted to one and despise the other. You can’t ser
96.
by explaininjs 3y ago
Where do you read that in Luke? To me, the message is very clear: This item is Caesar's. It has his name on it, his face on it, he made it, it's his. You should return it to him. You, on the other hand, are God's.
97.
by explaininjs 3y ago
I saw this first hand when I dropped my brother off at college and sat in on some late night group conversations. I'm only a few years older than him so I expected the vibes to be similar to when I was there, but instead of the talk of
98.
by explaininjs 3y ago
There's a long history of "this looks hard, I won't implement/fix it" in GitHub issues the LLM can train on.
99.
by explaininjs 3y ago
The standard doesn't have anything to do with TypeScript, not sure where you got that from? https://github.com/tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-managemen...
100.
by explaininjs 3y ago
Except one is already built into the language? And it provides all the upsides of signals with none of the downsides? (Modulo proper use of `using` directives)
101.
by explaininjs 3y ago
But then so are signals. The only "benefit" signals as proposed here give you is less control over the exact dispatch pattern of the graph, for instance things like debouncing, throttling, batching, etc etc etc. Aka all the things
102.
by explaininjs 3y ago
This pattern is precisely what everyone's favorite "look, JS/electron can be high performance!" example uses. (VS Code).
103.
by explaininjs 3y ago
The new `using` feature handles RAII just fine. This proposal is entirely unnecessary given the existence of `using` and the already-existing event listeners. https://iliazeus.github.io/articles/js-explicit-resource-man
104.
by explaininjs 3y ago
No, they don't. In fact, if you search "event" in the proposal you get exactly one result, the prefix of "eventually". This is a serious shortcoming of the proposal that should be addressed.
105.
by explaininjs 3y ago
Similar to how the interesting number paradox relies on a "shortcut statement" to force-up the number of non-interest, If Kolmogorov complexity were computable you could create a "shortcut program" to force-down the shor
106.
by explaininjs 3y ago
They call it entrapment - the officials put him in a position where be believes he's required to shoot in order to pass a test, but he sees no reason to. So finally he has to go with his gut and shoot the most probable target, even if
107.
by explaininjs 3y ago
Well of course he passed - they immediately after offer him the job and neuralize everyone else.
108.
by explaininjs 3y ago
I'm not sure how you'd determine the least real root to that, given all three have equally zero imaginary component.
109.
by explaininjs 3y ago
Now I want Men In Black mode, where your job is to identify the threat posed by the popup and shoot accordingly: Alien doing pull ups? Fine. 8 year old girl holding a Quantum Physics book in a dark alley? That's sus...
110.
by explaininjs 3y ago
Collect it yourself. I don't have a detailed log because the results were immediately obvious. You pretend to claim nothing can be obvious. I'm sure if you saw 12 people in a row guess your sign you'd think the correlation wa
111.
by explaininjs 3y ago
Your point has been telling me my experiment isn't valid because it doesn't align with your preconceived notions, telling me I'm "seeing things that aren't there" and that you know better than me about what I w
112.
by explaininjs 3y ago
Ok then just try it yourself. I'm sick and tired of an online person I've never met acting like they know more about statistics and experimental design than me regarding downright trivial experiment with results as obvious as day
113.
by explaininjs 3y ago
I'm well aware of the tricks that can be played, but there's simply no other explanation for the sheer volume of people who have said to me point blank, no hesitation, no beating around the bush, no listing out options to gauge re
114.
by explaininjs 3y ago
I'm not particularly interested in what constitutes a "real astronomical prediction", I'm more interested in the crux of the topic: Are there common traits shared amongst people with similar birthdates that experienced a
115.
by explaininjs 3y ago
Science is observation, not consumption. I ran the experiments, I got the data I needed to inform my opinion. You're more than welcome to do the same. But if all you will listen to is what scientific journals want to publish, you'
116.
by explaininjs 3y ago
Astronomical signs (in the west) are entirely related to the time of year when you were born and not at all related to the "arrangement of the planets", besides of course the position of the earth relative to the sun. The idea tha
117.
by explaininjs 3y ago
I mentioned a practical implication for interacting timescales in the sibling comment.
118.
by explaininjs 3y ago
Could those processes, for instance, have configured the initial state of the entire universe in 6 of their days, but 13.8B-6,000 of our call years? I see no reason why not.
119.
by explaininjs 3y ago
You're certainly welcome to completely ignore the question at hand, it's just surprising that you'd use so many characters to do so. The question is if there's a different sort of thing beyond our idea of time. We have
120.
by explaininjs 3y ago
I'm aware. What I'm saying is if that's how much you don't know, you'd better not make any claims like "X can't be accurate because it doesn't match what I think I do know".

More ›