explaininjs

7 ms·

31.
by explaininjs 2y ago
Upon reflection, it’s interesting that you leapt to describing my “flaw” as a burning desire to identify a “flaw”, when of course I did no such thing. But you did. That’s a common trope amongst evolutionists: “when I make unfounded assumpti
32.
by explaininjs 2y ago
No… it’s simply the worldview opposite creationism. Any assertions of feelings of superiority are very certainly projections. It’s interesting that my entire argument in this thread has been equivalence, but people want to interpret it as s
33.
by explaininjs 2y ago
See the rest of the thread for people who understand the basic concept of debate. It’s not my job to make that persons argument for them.
34.
by explaininjs 2y ago
1. I mean axioms we take as fact when establishing a world view. 2. It can’t be proven that they are time invariant, that’s what you take on belief. 3. That’s not what I’m referring to. I’m referring to the laws themselves suddenly changing
35.
by explaininjs 2y ago
You clearly missed the paragraph where I very explicitly talked about the time variant differentiable middle ground? That’s surprising, it’s the majority of the content. Regardless, I’m not talking about functions describing the universal s
36.
by explaininjs 2y ago
I don’t consider a belief in evolutionism a flaw any more than I consider belief in creationism a flaw. All I have said is that evolutionists match the GP’s description of being unwilling to consider what assumptions they are making, “hitti
37.
by explaininjs 2y ago
Parts are, parts aren’t. If you aren’t able to specify exactly what you believe with regard to it, there’s not much more to say.
38.
by explaininjs 2y ago
No, “evolutionism” is actually the most correct characterization. The quip about scientology was meant to caricaturise the belief more than anything. Your claims 1 and 2 are both incorrect. Creationists and Evolutionists can both agree that
39.
by explaininjs 2y ago
The worldview characterized by an axiomatic belief in the time invariance of physical laws. It is contrasted by creationism, which posits non-differentiable physical behaviors. There’s a middle ground of accepting the possibility of differe
40.
by explaininjs 2y ago
What’d be really great is a codegen aspect. A non-negligible part of any data munching operation is “this input object has fields X, Y, Z and we need an output object with fields X, f(X), Y, f(Y,Z)”. This is something and LLM has a decent c
41.
by explaininjs 2y ago
Watch out with the array mode though, according to OpenAI docs it technically can return the results in any order and you must sort them by index to be sure you have the right associations. I’ve never seen them out of order in practice, b
42.
by explaininjs 2y ago
You mean the question? Everyone should be able to see the answer of the active clue.
43.
by explaininjs 2y ago
I wouldn’t call my case a horror story. This is still a million times better than how it was, and I’d absolutely go back do it again. In fact I am considering getting a “tune up” round, but it’s a lot of money and leaves your eyes out of op
44.
by explaininjs 2y ago
I’ve had astigmatism ever since a laser eye surgery. It’s unnoticeable 95% of the time, but every site that forces dark mode on me makes it immediately obvious. I immediately find a light switch or leave.
45.
by explaininjs 2y ago
Initially, sure. But the incentives of everyone involved are aligned to make the organization tend to grow in budget and scope bounded only by the public’s willingness to pay for it. The more they can convince the public to pay, the more mo
46.
by explaininjs 2y ago
Not at all. It means Colorado DPHE has performed a test and concluded the subject requires further testing by the CDC before any diagnosis can be made. These are well documented established protocols created by domain expert scientists folk
47.
by explaininjs 2y ago
Their funding is very directly tied to how big of a deal people consider the issues they’re tasked with to be. You ever see a government bureaucrat argue “the mission my agency handles is really easy and not very important, we could make do
48.
by explaininjs 2y ago
Nobody has tested positive since the 2 from 2022. The three counted in this article are what’s known as “presumptive positive”, which is a different term reserved for those who have not tested positive. It’s just another scare tactic, one w
49.
by explaininjs 2y ago
That’s the people who had any symptoms of anything at all who were in the test set. Only three of them tested positive, for a grand total of 5 cases since May 2022. Yellow journalism at its finest.
50.
by explaininjs 2y ago
No, that’s what a second place is. A third place is for socialization, a second place is for work. Just because you’re relying on some independent small business owner to pay rent for your desk while you prevent other customers from patroni
51.
by explaininjs 2y ago
In LA, every small locally owned coffee shop has become totally overrun with folks buying one latte and proceeding to take a whole table to themselves and their laptops for the next 5 hours.
52.
by explaininjs 2y ago
SAB solves the problem of having a small number of dedicated workers that efficiently handle specific well constrained data processing tasks. I must question whether the problem of random sites wanting to spin up a whole ton of cores that c
53.
by explaininjs 2y ago
Indeed. And there’s a whole Atomics namespace in the standard library for thread safety while using it. Again, there’s very few actual uses for wasm. The main one is when you have a preexisting library in a different language, other than th
54.
by explaininjs 2y ago
Why would wasm be needed for build time tools? We already use fast compiled languages for modern webpack replacements (esbuild, swc, Bun :: Go, Rust, Zig), and they don’t use wasm.
55.
by explaininjs 2y ago
This use case is purposefully hamstringed for demo purposes. Rust or Go won’t change anything here, you still need to pass messages to/from the worker. Same exact mechanism as if you used a webworker, which are already widely available
56.
by explaininjs 2y ago
You can just expose the data to all sites with your own extension if you have access to the device.
57.
by explaininjs 2y ago
Because every bottle is clearly labeled “The FDA has not evaluated this for treating any condition”. There are a great many products that the FDA hasn’t evaluated that are still sold, why should these be any different?
58.
by explaininjs 2y ago
I'm talking satisfying business needs not philosophical mumbo jumbo. If you need a model to move, you give it to a rigger. If the mesh is bad, they will first need to remesh it or the rigging wont work right. This is the problem . The
59.
by explaininjs 2y ago
This is incorrect. > Given a text prompt provided by the user, Stage I creates […] a 3D mesh.
60.
by explaininjs 2y ago
If the claim was that the problem was solved, sure it might make sense that the package does not need to be touched (in reality the field isn’t as slow as you presume, but I digress). Instead, the claim is that it’s “nearly^{TM}” solved,

More ›