Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
exodust
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
121.
▲
by
exodust
1y ago
Your example doesn't appear to contain a reply from grok, only a question.
122.
▲
by
exodust
1y ago
True. I see that too. It's a good addition to community notes. It can correctly evaluate "partially true" posts and those lacking details, so it's great at spotting cherry-picked information.
123.
▲
by
exodust
1y ago
And here we go. SEOs scrambling to get "rewarded" in AI-driven search results. The article takes a swing at uncovering the secrets of "how to get your ideas included in more LLM responses." In this case the LLM was spot
124.
▲
by
exodust
1y ago
You've evaluated a tiny sample of restaurant websites and extrapolated to make claims about the overwhelming majority - in the millions, across the globe. "Most are generic crap" doesn't mean restaurants aim for that ben
125.
▲
by
exodust
2y ago
Still use Google for quick generic lookups, spell-checks/definitions, shopping stuff, products, or things I know will return a good result. Grok is great for finding details and background info about recent news, and of course it'
126.
▲
by
exodust
2y ago
3-5 prompts doesn't get you a professional restaurant website. The key word is professional . A good restaurant website begins with taking good photos of the premises and the food. AI won't come around to your business and take p
127.
▲
by
exodust
2y ago
They are not stealing! Indiana Jones is already out there in pop culture. We shouldn't complain about AI holding a mirror up to our world and noting "you guys love Indiana Jones a lot. Here's a picture inspired by his appeara
128.
▲
by
exodust
2y ago
If you're handing out red cards for repetition, aren't you guilty of the same infringement? You repeated the exact same prompt, which is itself an obvious bait for AI to draw the pop-culture lookalike. I'm surprised by the co
129.
▲
by
exodust
2y ago
The prompt is what's lacking creativity. The AI knows it, and produced the obvious popular result for a bland prompt. Want something more unique? Write better prompts.
130.
▲
by
exodust
2y ago
Spread on toast with goats cheese, sauteed mushroom & fresh chilli; poached eggs on top of all that. Brew coffee and there's work-from-home breakfast sorted.
131.
▲
by
exodust
2y ago
> AI is the best programming tutor you can wish for...you can always ask for clarification or examples when something isn't clear Yep, AI can teach beginners the fundamentals with endless patience and examples to suit everyone
132.
▲
by
exodust
2y ago
> "writing down exactly what he wants" is just coding! Agreed. The more exact and clear your instructions are, the closer to programming it is. Presumably the non-technical person has an application where they care about thin
133.
▲
by
exodust
2y ago
Fair enough. I mentioned "initial fun". I enjoyed it to a point, but recall it abruptly ends and seemed unfinished, unresolved. The berating was cute at first then gets old. Compared with a game like Portal, with similar self-refe
134.
▲
by
exodust
2y ago
Never understood the appeal of stanley parable or beginners guide. After the initial fun wears off, the constant abuse and sarcasm from the narrator is abrasive and noisy. Not as clever as they're hoping. The Beginners Guide even worse
135.
▲
by
exodust
2y ago
> Prove the claimed fraud. This is a forum not a court of law. You're hung up on "fraud" and lost sight of the discussion. Sometimes "fraud" is, for the time being, billowing black smoke. There's a small c
136.
▲
by
exodust
2y ago
I'm not an American and I'm not expressing my likes or dislikes in this matter. I'm interested in seeing a healthy America. I'm interested in the details, drama, action, science and politics which trickles down or across
137.
▲
by
exodust
2y ago
> Show that the money was spent in a way different than proscribed by law When people find loopholes in the law to obtain grants, do you defend their actions because technically it didn't break the law? DOGE is apparently exposing
138.
▲
by
exodust
2y ago
> recent (regrettable) turn It's only regrettable through the lens of partisan politics. DOGE is undeniably a good concept. You will notice governments around the world copying the method. That is, launching initiatives to audit e
139.
▲
by
exodust
2y ago
What? The parent article is a SpaceX mission post. Meanwhile I note you have contributed 2 posts in this topic and both of them are about Trump. Do you have any thoughts on the actual event that took place? Or is your needle stuck in Trump&
140.
▲
by
exodust
2y ago
Again, this thread's parent article is a SpaceX mission launch post stating a brief outline and details. And the top comment links to some rubbish tech-wanker article.
141.
▲
by
exodust
2y ago
Again, the topic is "crew returning to Earth." You, Berger, and whoever posted the arstechnica link have brought politics to the party. I liked how they had a drone circling the recovery activity at the splashdown site. All live-s
142.
▲
by
exodust
2y ago
> "they were re-scheduled" You're over-correcting and understating. "Nothing to see here" is not how we describe 8 days turning into 9 months. Don't be angry about hype. Everyone has access to what the ast
143.
▲
by
exodust
2y ago
The topic is "crew returns to Earth" not arstechnica's routine political spin. Does arstechnica mention the dolphins even once? Nope. How about Trump? Six times ! Meanwhile, sibling comment applauds the writer for his "
144.
▲
by
exodust
2y ago
In this case, negative energy often leads to civil unrest and other things in law enforcement's wheelhouse. The police were even called to Google's offices last year, you might remember. Pro-palestine clowns refused to leave the o
145.
▲
by
exodust
2y ago
You keep repeating "constitutionally protected activity" like it carries more weight the more you repeat. The Intercept article does the same thing. If we step back and look at what's happening at "pro palestine" pr
146.
▲
by
exodust
2y ago
> everything we know Please demonstrate what you know before making representations about what we know. The restaurant sells more pizza than pasta, so they put pizza on the first page of menu. The strategy works, people come back f
147.
▲
by
exodust
2y ago
So the user has something in mind. Your example is a recipe. Just to clarify my point. Google isn't meddling with your Lasagna recipes. The parent poster claimed website owners need to " bend your website to satisfy both Google se
148.
▲
by
exodust
2y ago
Surely there's more similarities than differences. We inspect HTML, we mess with CSS, we debug javascript, we look at headers, responses, warnings and errors. All that stuff is the same in both browsers. So what exactly about your shit
149.
▲
by
exodust
2y ago
That's an answer to a different question. Italian restaurants might use the first page of their menu for pizza. Do customers who want pasta conclude pasta "doesn't exist" because it's not listed on first page?
150.
▲
by
exodust
2y ago
> can’t find it on Google via keywords Can't find what? Are you saying people are using Google to search for things they've misplaced? At what point is the user thinking "I can't find what I'm looking for?"
More ›