eximius

25 ms·

301.
by eximius 5y ago
Bahaha I made an account a few days ago! So glad I used a throwaway email.
302.
by eximius 5y ago
Ultimately, I think thisnis going to come down to preference. I would prefer not to have to fix 20 constructors. It's tedious and time consuming. The intermediate classes that _do technically depend on FooService because BarService doe
303.
by eximius 5y ago
Replacing DI with Free Monads is not what I'd call simple. It's not even possible in a type safe way in most(?) languages.
304.
by eximius 5y ago
My point was about ignorance in general, not specifically flat earthers.
305.
by eximius 5y ago
I imagine that is because Go is not used for applications of the same breadth as Java. Go is typically structured with many relatively small binaries. Each binary can be relatively self-contained. The way I've seen Java used, it typica
306.
by eximius 5y ago
> Just call `new` yourself, instead of having the framework do it for you. But at that point, why would I want to? There are reasons I wouldn't want to, but there is no inherent value, to me, in manually calling new.
307.
by eximius 5y ago
As someone who hated Java, used it for a few years, and now occasionally misses it... I only miss DI. I miss being able to say "this system depends on these external things" and having a consistent, convenient way of sharing/
308.
by eximius 5y ago
they dont make a difference until they do. ignorance builds into decay of our institutions.
309.
by eximius 5y ago
From a programming language design space, it's much more like C++. However it can occupy some niches that C can but C++ does poorly because of zero cost abstractions, I think. (Very handwavy)
310.
by eximius 5y ago
Perhaps I've only had to deal with sane Java codebases - I feel like magic is not the norm in Java. Magic is built into the Ruby language, what with everything being "message passing" under the hood.
311.
by eximius 5y ago
I think Ruby might be the antithesis to Java. For all that I despise Java's ridiculous boiler plate, I always know exactly what's going on. In Ruby, I feel like there are unknowns in every file. I hate Java, but Ruby makes me miss
312.
by eximius 5y ago
Play. Games (video games, board games, ttrpgs, etc), books, climbing, etc! Just because I can be responsible doesn't mean I had to lose the ability to enjoy things like a child would. Just.. a little more mature. Buy a sword and a bunc
313.
by eximius 5y ago
In terms of defensive technology, maybe. MAD isnt stopped by having bigger bombs.
314.
by eximius 5y ago
My devices never seemed to pick up the announcement.. I think. Admittedly it was close to two years ago, last I played with it. I'll check it out!
315.
by eximius 5y ago
I'm pretty sure I have IPv6, I just haven't figured out how to set it up on my Mikrotik router :/
316.
by eximius 5y ago
So, no authentication is billed as a feature, but just means you might get spam notifications?
317.
by eximius 5y ago
AGI is orders of magnitude more complex than the toys we're playing with in machine learning today. It's like building a factory and then expecting factories that build themselves to be right around the corner. They're just s
318.
by eximius 5y ago
Gah, I'm finally giving OSMC another try this year (tuned downstream distro of Kodi). Honestly, the biggest problem is I probably need to organize my NFS so the dang indexing works. That was always the biggest problem I had in the past
319.
by eximius 5y ago
> No one has ever called me out on this Have you ever been stuck debugging something, maybe even something that should be simple, for days at a time? I know I have. I think because, in the course of actual work, we encounter these kind
320.
by eximius 5y ago
It does not imply one to one or onto. Unique pair (a, b) only implies for any a, the corresponding b is unambiguous. There could easily be (a1, b) and (a2, b), thus not one to one, and there could easily be a b1 such that there is no corres
321.
by eximius 5y ago
My latest job has a somewhat reasonable set of clauses, but I still wanted some of the verbiage changed. I wasn't able to get that ("we use standardized contracts across the org"), but they were willing to give me a seconda
322.
by eximius 5y ago
UB that just says "this is an axiom the compiler makes" is fine. Ignoring it as a possibility is fine. Lighting your program on fire when it knows you've done it instead of just telling you or doing something consistent is
323.
by eximius 5y ago
I don't follow. This demonstrates that we use UB, not that we need it?
324.
by eximius 5y ago
That is extremely concerning, then, that it is so difficult to use after all that time. I had hopes in the back of my head that "maybe it'll get better/more ergonomic in the next few years".
325.
by eximius 5y ago
Generally calling something security theatre has an implication that it shouldnt be done because of its inefficacy and the availability of robust alternatives (e.g., port knocking is theatre when we can have robust security on known ports w
326.
by eximius 5y ago
> It gives the illusion of security, but they would absolutely not deter a determined threat actor. Sure. And the threat of jail/imprisonment doesn't deter determined murderer's. It doesn't mean we shouldn't put
327.
by eximius 5y ago
Defacing property is not free speech...?
328.
by eximius 5y ago
transaction fees you either dont pay enough and are ignored or you pay enough and... great?
329.
by eximius 5y ago
A true scotsman rolls their own callstack.
330.
by eximius 5y ago
Nobody is against on-shore manufacturing and the infrastructure bill will probably assist in the construction of this, not to mention gov private business subsidies being a massive point of hypocrisy for the GOP.

More ›