Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
exasperaited
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
61.
▲
by
exasperaited
10mo ago
Yes, VarSets are definitely better (more granular dependency recalculations). The little-known Configuration Tables aspect of Spreadsheets is absolutely worth using, though, and has no equivalent in the VarSets scheme at this point. Once
62.
▲
by
exasperaited
10mo ago
I think I understand this — I mean, OpenSCAD was my brief gateway to parametric CAD, and then I got to FreeCAD via brief stepping stones of CadQuery and other packages. But OpenSCAD isn't really parametric CAD . It's a programmin
63.
▲
by
exasperaited
10mo ago
OpenSCAD isn't a CAD tool, IMO. It does nothing at all to aid your design. It barely even helps describe it in any abstract way. It is a useful tool for programmatically describing either very simple or heavily geometric objects. For
64.
▲
by
exasperaited
10mo ago
Neat-ish. I don't really see why that code is better, more logical, more readable or more robust than the equivalent quite trivial parametrics in more or less any GUI CAD program, and I think the geek discourse is really harmed by peop
65.
▲
by
exasperaited
10mo ago
The Pico series is, IMO, the truest implementation of the Raspberry Pi Foundation’s broader goal to make physical computing accessible to education. I am so glad that this is now such a major focus for both the foundation and the trading co
66.
▲
by
exasperaited
10mo ago
Right. I think if it’s a presentation about the object then there could be plenty of applications for this. I will definitely be trying it.
67.
▲
by
exasperaited
10mo ago
Sooner or later, the age of your machine will affect browser compatibility. It doesn't even take many things to do this — the knock-on support of a bug in a driver that no-one wants to fix, a package that you like that prevents you fro
68.
▲
by
exasperaited
10mo ago
Argh word creep. It has been published as an open specification . Whether it is a standard isn't for them to declare.
69.
▲
by
exasperaited
10mo ago
> Major VC firm investing in slop farm And this would be an entirely clickbait-free, fact-based summary of what they are doing. It's not far off fraud as a service. This activity could get people prosecuted in EU countries and the U
70.
▲
by
exasperaited
10mo ago
A16Z is basically funding toxic fungi growing on the face of society at this point. So much of what they do seems to be a bet that people will want to pay money to do antisocial things and avoid the consequences.
71.
▲
by
exasperaited
10mo ago
AI-powered solipsistic reassurance?
72.
▲
by
exasperaited
10mo ago
> In many cases he helped build the bandwagons you're implying he simply jumped onto. The fact that I cannot tell if you mean this satirically or not (though I want to believe you do!) is alarming to me.
73.
▲
by
exasperaited
10mo ago
EAITD: Everything AI Touches Dies
74.
▲
by
exasperaited
10mo ago
I mean I suppose in all fairness we should carve out a huge exception for tech and medical stories. Perhaps it is my/our geek bias that we habitually do, and we are therefore excusing some of this without intending to? It is worth pond
75.
▲
by
exasperaited
10mo ago
Like this administration cares about little things like how many states there are. L'état, c'est Trump.
76.
▲
by
exasperaited
10mo ago
==> We are going to build infrastructure with teams of people who won't stay longer than two years. Nobody has thought about this long enough to realise this might be a problem.
77.
▲
by
exasperaited
10mo ago
Oh, thanks for this link. Looks great and it may suit me well. I need to settle in and learn Python but I am experiencing tremendously severe dysregulation at the moment, and my normal quick deep learning is simply not happening.
78.
▲
by
exasperaited
10mo ago
If you are avoiding subscriptions, are you doing credit buckets? Up front X months in advance and a reminder to top up? I find either of these more ethical but it is worth noting that any non-expiring, roll-over credit scheme is going to ki
79.
▲
by
exasperaited
10mo ago
Right. Scooter Libby portrayed as a “Hill staffer”.
80.
▲
by
exasperaited
10mo ago
Fake sources (outside the gossip and celebrity columns and a couple of cheap tabloids in any given country) is essentially a non-issue even now. “non-credible” anonymous sources: that’s in the eye of the beholder, I guess. It is in any gove
81.
▲
by
exasperaited
10mo ago
This is indeed a delightful film. I tend to forget that Nicollette Sheridan was the titular character. It’s unusual (but perhaps explains some of Reiner’s interest, I wonder) that this film has an identifiable, personified McGuffin.
82.
▲
by
exasperaited
10mo ago
I know a few people who would love a device that gave them only the things they need and none of the rest. A great keyboard, enough room for writing. I use an iPad with a keyboard when I need this kind of “writing room” thing, but I know so
83.
▲
by
exasperaited
10mo ago
Instantly in love with the 80s ad design cues in the website design. Disappointing that the 3D design files are Fusion, though; this is fully within FreeCAD’s scope.
84.
▲
by
exasperaited
10mo ago
I dunno. I still really like Lighthouse (for Laravel). It's about the only thing about my job I still do like. The difference is that it is schema-first, so you are describing your API at a level that largely replaces backend-for-front
85.
▲
by
exasperaited
10mo ago
I once had to threaten to resign from a job (in the EU, pre-Data Protection Act) over the data handling of evidence of one of the things in your comment. I think this has been something people have had an instinct about forever, and the onl
86.
▲
by
exasperaited
10mo ago
> I know you absolutely hate being told you're holding them wrong... but you're holding them wrong. Wow, was that a shark just then?
87.
▲
by
exasperaited
10mo ago
It is an aside, but: I am not sure I encountered any professional photographers saying that in 2005 , FWIW; only non-serious photographers were still prattling on about e.g. the mystical and conveniently malleable "theoretical"
88.
▲
by
exasperaited
10mo ago
Why would they not? You still wouldn't necessarily want a life insurance company to know stuff they haven't formally asked to know, you still have health information that could be used to blackmail you or whose reveal would be hum
89.
▲
by
exasperaited
10mo ago
That's probably, what, 200,000 refreshes? From what I gather, at book-reading speeds, newer e-ink displays may never wear out in a human lifetime. But at usable computer display speeds I rather suspect many of these panels have a lifet
90.
▲
by
exasperaited
10mo ago
How long will the display last like this?
More ›