ewindal

9 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by ewindal 7y ago

   They’re names, but like Bob, they’re not names that fit kids. Names are like fashion, they come in cycles. If your name is off-cycle, it’ll often sound a generation or two too far removed.
2. 62.▲
   by ewindal 7y ago

   Oof, that list is terrible. Natan is listed twice, and there’s at least one name that isn’t a palindrome. The only two names that really work from that list is Anna and Hannah. Nobody should name their kid Bob in 2020, it’s not a «young» na
3. 63.▲
   by ewindal 7y ago

   No, corporate adopted it because it’s profitable right now.
4. 64.▲
   by ewindal 7y ago

   Of course it can, but I believe the things men derive intrinsic satisfaction from are much more slow to change.
5. 65.▲
   by ewindal 7y ago

   > they'll most likely suffer from down syndrome or other conditions An order of magnitude higher chance of genetic defects isn’t very significant when the initial risk is less than .1%
6. 66.▲
   by ewindal 7y ago

   Men are too dependent on women and work for validation for «society» to allow a broader expression of the male gender role. Those who can’t get fullfilment through their job won’t get it any easier, and I don’t see women’s tastes in men cha