evrydayhustling

7 ms·

61.
by evrydayhustling 2y ago
Just did some preliminary testing on decrypting some ROT cyphertext which would have been viable for a human on paper. The output was pretty disappointing: lots of "workish" steps creating letter counts, identifying common words,
62.
by evrydayhustling 2y ago
I'm confused about some of the implications regarding crowd infections. Certainly for some of these -- say, Chicken Pox -- we know that early and controlled exposure is preferable to a first case later in life. And that the cycle of h
63.
by evrydayhustling 2y ago
I'm no chemist, but from a comp sci perspective the title claim seems overstrong. One can show that certain models of one category outperform certain models of another on certain benchmarks, or first demonstrate some impressive result
64.
by evrydayhustling 2y ago
Thx. The Springer Nature PDF is somehow STILL confusing as it addresses family ties to NY but not to Axel Springer. However, I guess my priors regarding family business were overstrong.
65.
by evrydayhustling 2y ago
The entire article is about the semantics of the word "open", so an organization literally named "OpenAI" is obviously relevant on the article's own terms. Besides which, this is a summary of a research paper that D
66.
by evrydayhustling 2y ago
Interesting, I wonder why it was omitted in Springer's top tier journal Nature? Oh yeah: https://openai.com/index/axel-springer-partnership/ Edit: Looks like the science publishing company is "operated
67.
by evrydayhustling 2y ago
I'm late to this party, but here's a post I wrote about it. This is more motivation but we are working on technical posts/papers for release. Happy to field emails in the meantime if this is timely for you. https:/&#x
68.
by evrydayhustling 2y ago
If you can't find things to criticize about yourself, it means you aren't improving. Sharing these critiques helps others both learn from your mistakes, and that it's ok to learn from their own.
69.
by evrydayhustling 2y ago
"SJ can't own all female AI voices" is attacking a straw man version of the complaint, which is much narrower. The question is whether OpenAI deliberately fostered the impression of an association between their product and h
70.
by evrydayhustling 2y ago
Not a lawyer, but wouldn't the important intent be the one when the voice is released, not the first moment someone gets hired? The economic harm happens when you publicize the voice in a way designed to gain value from Johannsen&#x27
71.
by evrydayhustling 2y ago
This is an example of a non-falsifiable theory. Since it will not produce evidence, it deserves the same credibility as the infinite other such theories, like the idea that god strikes down civilizations which communicate beyond their star
72.
by evrydayhustling 3y ago
Love this article but would like to dispute the author's notion of "real". In the post, he shows that the frequency domain is not special , in the sense that there are infinitely other equally valid representations. But man
73.
by evrydayhustling 3y ago
Wait - your first paragraph has nothing to do with your moral. What's "diluted"? It seems like you want to say "be skeptical about numbers.". Fine. But what does that have to do with the course?
74.
by evrydayhustling 3y ago
Pretty big knowledge miss actually - Lincoln's fighting skills were both legend and a matter of public record [1]. In his most famous, documented match -- for which some credit him with the invention of the "choke slam" [2] -
75.
by evrydayhustling 3y ago
I was thinking about radiatori going into this. Anybody know on which axes this shape is supposed to beat radiatori? Seems to me radiatori has max surface area per wheat, so it should dominate on sauceability. Also thrilled to have an opp
76.
by evrydayhustling 3y ago
At scale, being confident your data is authentically pre-2024 is going to be hard unless you are maintaining the corpus already! Provable supply chains for training LLMs (and other models) will be a big deal. PS - "every cousin from
77.
by evrydayhustling 3y ago
Seems clear from references in other comments that the usable sphere is large enough that Lagrange points can be "shared" by many parties (within most conceptions of current equipment size and interference). What about the opposit
78.
by evrydayhustling 3y ago
Why should you be able to pay to jump any line, just to go through the same screening? Total regulatory graft.
79.
by evrydayhustling 3y ago
Adding a legal battle with the FTC to the cost of any acquisition can chill and kill otherwise obvious deals, and or sap value out of those that push through. FWIW, I think there are good reasons to limit tech consolidation, including this
80.
by evrydayhustling 3y ago
Your take here converges with a long-standing debate in AI regarding embodiment. Our natural world doesn't distinguish between "inputs" and "outputs" -- instead, all the causes, effects, and even our analysis of eve
81.
by evrydayhustling 3y ago
I think open source advocates bring some understandable but wrong intuitions to how LLMs are being distributed. In the world of hand-coded software, binaries are hard to work with, source is easy to work with, and compilation is cheap. In t
82.
by evrydayhustling 3y ago
Title is busted -- maybe "Penguin survives on 4-second microsleeps 10k times per day"
83.
by evrydayhustling 3y ago
This is a very interesting study, but the generalization implied in the abstract -- that specialized models may not have advantages in specialized domains -- is an overreach for two reasons. They introduce medprompt, which combines chain of
84.
by evrydayhustling 3y ago
Ah yes, the dreaded Linux monopoly. Well, the cure is simple: just don't contribute to or use open source. Or were you hoping to keep others from sharing things for free?
85.
by evrydayhustling 3y ago
Which clause are you calling "you can use this at our pleasure"? The license is short and there is no such thing. The most restrictive item is whether you had 750M active users in the month before it was released. [1] I'm
86.
by evrydayhustling 3y ago
Cutting edge AI is a world-changing technology that is at immediate risk of being monopolized by 1-2 organizations pushing for global regulation against competitors and individuals who would develop their own. We desperately need "Op
87.
by evrydayhustling 3y ago
They've confirmed that there is an "AI scientist team" at OpenAI??? Sounds like a lot of journalism happened in between those updates.
88.
by evrydayhustling 3y ago
Getting the government to regulate your competition isn't 5d chess, it's barely even chess. If you study the birth of any technology in the last 200 years -- rail, electricity, radio, integrated circuits, etc -- you will see the
89.
by evrydayhustling 3y ago
I'm a huge fan of both, but you're not the first person I've heard who had problems with the writing style / dialogue / characterization of Fire. In that respect, I'm not sure Deepness will feel different. Vi
90.
by evrydayhustling 3y ago
Metric time is about factors too, but it prioritizes the factors that simplify the comparison across (literally) many orders of magnitude. This is way less helpful for everyday life because we usually only reason within 2-3 orders of magni

More ›