eviks

34 ms·

811.
by eviks 10mo ago
Pity such an awful document format with so many basic fails at being digital, continues to reign in a lot of areas!
812.
by eviks 10mo ago
Hostile indeed, and also happens in user-facing documents like product manuals!
813.
by eviks 10mo ago
But you can leak the content of a file that you printed out and couldn't redact properly by using an inferior method
814.
by eviks 10mo ago
> That is ... not at all surprising? For the 3rd time, this conversation is not about YOU and not about what surprises you! > "Lack of authorization" has a clear legal meaning whereas "hack" does not. No, you&#x27
815.
by eviks 10mo ago
> They're equivalent in security They aren't, security is defined as the amount of information you leak. If you have an inferior process where you're substituting the correct digital match with an in incorrect manual match
816.
by eviks 10mo ago
> The blog has no relevance to your claim that the print and scan procedure somehow fundamentally precludes automated search and replace. It has direct relevance since it describes the process as lacking the automated search and replace
817.
by eviks 10mo ago
Why would I settle for a rough equivalence? The point was about the chance of making mistakes in redaction, so sure, if you ignore the difference in the chance of making mistakes (which the underline process increases), everything becomes e
818.
by eviks 10mo ago
> Not the layman, at least to the best of my knowledge. Are you not aware of content that is criminal to possess? Like CP is the most common example. > I am not responsible for your actions. I've already addressed this confusion
819.
by eviks 10mo ago
The reading is focused, but that focus is wasted on menial work, which makes it easier to miss something more important > give the brain short breaks Set a timer if you feel that's of any use? Why does the break have to depend on th
820.
by eviks 10mo ago
That's not true, you can mistakenly receive data you're not authorized to have (might even be criminal to have!) > That's entirely different from gaining unauthorized entry to a system and copying out files that were never
821.
by eviks 10mo ago
So following that strange logic if a dumb person knows he's dumb, he's suddenly become intelligent? Or is that impossible by your peculiar definition of intelligence?
822.
by eviks 10mo ago
> This is the only weakness of Barr's method. Of course it isn't, the other weakness you just dismiss is the higher risk of failed searches. People already fail with digital, it's even harder to do in print or translate di
823.
by eviks 10mo ago
You process doesn't make sense, why wouldn't you just black box redact right away and print and scan? What does underline then ink give you? But it's also not the process described in the blog > that's very difficult
824.
by eviks 10mo ago
You can use constant /variable length replacement to avoid length leaks?
825.
by eviks 10mo ago
Also had this first thought, but then a hack could just be a way around a limit/lack of authorization, doesn't have to be unknown/sophisticated, so copy of black boxes fits
826.
by eviks 10mo ago
> but smart AF. When Barr’s DOJ released a redacted version of the Mueller Report, they printed the whole thing, made their redactions with actual ink, and then re-scanned every page to generate a new PDF with absolutely no digital trace
827.
by eviks 10mo ago
> I want to keep things as simple as possible. The whole post proves the opposite is true!
828.
by eviks 10mo ago
These nags are very disrespectful indeed and widespread, Apple also sometimes has undissmissable iOS upgrade label (liquid glass, leave me alone!) Though you can bypass tpm requirements if you want to upgrade to win11, and also can switch t
829.
by eviks 10mo ago
How is it hard to add curved base to l?
830.
by eviks 11mo ago
Why hasn't the anti-corporate fiasco (not a single successful example) convinced you that it's not enough?
831.
by eviks 11mo ago
But they did open source it separately? https://www.gpui.rs/ How are they tied?
832.
by eviks 11mo ago
No, it doesn't do what I expect, the list of the default rebindable keybinds is small, can't bind multiple shortcuts to a single function, can't bind without modifiers- if I recall correctly after trying it out a while ago.
833.
by eviks 11mo ago
> They also have useful keyboard behaviour Like not being able to change the default shortcuts?
834.
by eviks 11mo ago
> Firefox will remain our anchor. It will evolve into a modern AI browser Aligning yourself with garbage generators is how you lose trust. Meanwhile, the top user requested features still point to basic deficiencies of browser UI
835.
by eviks 11mo ago
And the authorities are blocking it to protect people from falling into the honeypot, right?
836.
by eviks 11mo ago
What's up with all the space waste, the search button is almost as big as the input box, so you can't fit a long query on a phone (and the query box doesn't expand to fit more than one line)
837.
by eviks 11mo ago
In what way are they semantic? Can you avoid a conflict if 2 people change the names of 2 different variables on one line as these are semantically unrelated changes? Does git do crdt?
838.
by eviks 11mo ago
This article fails to distinguish between false claims and true claims - VPN providers sometimes explicitly mark some locations as virtual, so there is no mismatch between the claim and the real exist as the title says, because the original
839.
by eviks 11mo ago
> Running the script with PowerShell 7 can cause issues, to avoid this ensure you are running Windows PowerShell (5.1) Interesting, I'd expect it to be more backwards compatible given the overall reputation
840.
by eviks 11mo ago
> The reach and pace of AI’s impact to society, including many dimensions of higher education, means that we at Purdue must lean in and lean forward and do so across different functions at the university Not really, you're the one a

More ›