eviks

34 ms·

751.
by eviks 10mo ago
Why do you feel like it's ok to make up nonsense about imposing? How can I impose anything on that project? Why break the expected/established workflow of users if the explanation doesn't work? Why are you asking 3 questions
752.
by eviks 10mo ago
They do, and it's even misapplied in this example - there are weird hard line breaks (an ASCII character) in the wrong places, breaking the supposed "accessibility" of the format. But also, you continue to miss the point - th
753.
by eviks 10mo ago
> This pattern makes it easier for maintainers or contributors to find issues to work on since every issue is ready to be worked on. How is this not trivially solved via a "ready-to-be-worked-on" tag?
754.
by eviks 10mo ago
> Plain text is as readable as it is possible to be. Which is nonsense, of course, just like this site illustrates. Trivial formatting and layout changes make it more readable. > Besides, this is exactly the kind of site HN constantly
755.
by eviks 10mo ago
The poor readability of the site itself is the best case against its core point
756.
by eviks 10mo ago
You can block macros in Word, so you're only left with unformatted downsides?
757.
by eviks 10mo ago
There are plenty of things to compete on: efficiency (startup time, memory use), security (from ad blocking on sites to extensions to the app itself), customization (both in looks and behavior)
758.
by eviks 10mo ago
Consider reality instead, you can make any fantasy case you want: C. You didn't pirate, but played because your friends were deeply into it, so you skipped buying lunch to save money and pay for the game (pirating was hard for this spe
759.
by eviks 10mo ago
Are there any creators that evolved and shoot at high frame rates that eliminate the need for motion interpolation and its artifacts or is the grip of the bad old film culture still too strong? (there are at least some 48fps films)
760.
by eviks 10mo ago
Does the suspension break in games, which are not reality? Is there any evidence lower quality is better?
761.
by eviks 10mo ago
That's not relevant to the issue of "ownership"
762.
by eviks 10mo ago
Because the price isn't binary? Also, the total spend isn't fixed either, it depends on how easy it's to pirate. So it's by definition still lost revenue, even if later/at reduced price
763.
by eviks 10mo ago
No, you misunderstood the comment, it said that paying nothing is compelling, not that paying something was inconceivable or something; it was a response to a comment with a common misconception that pirating is only some "service prob
764.
by eviks 10mo ago
The same way you sell your disks: find a buyer, send them the game files, they send you the money
765.
by eviks 10mo ago
Why do you think this contradicts anything? Heavy users hit a budget limit and continue consuming more via pirating. You really need something way better than some shoddy survey to counter the obvious fact that price matters
766.
by eviks 10mo ago
So following that silly comic you'd ban utf-8 because it breaks consistency? (even though in reality it beat most other standards, not just became 15th)
767.
by eviks 10mo ago
the principles aren't sound > To promote balanced usage, ... equal distribution eliminates the strain of overextending the right fingers What overextension? You don't even type them frequently enough for your index/middle
768.
by eviks 10mo ago
This conclusion makes as much sense as saying software delivers no value because you've never personally seen an app without bugs
769.
by eviks 10mo ago
Or you make the tasks smaller and ban bathroom breaks, or replace the task with an equivalently challenging one if break is given. Or you check for phones before the exam. There are a lot of things that can be done.
770.
by eviks 10mo ago
> Apparently we were not registered at Troisdorf station, so we are on the wrong tracks. We cannot stop.” And of course there is some huge fine or even potentially jail time if you moo in protest and pull that nice red lever to avoid the
771.
by eviks 10mo ago
Paraphrasing > it's possible to achieve non90s styling qualities using those frameworks But also if it's not, then use that as an argument instead of the non sequitur of the abandoned new
772.
by eviks 10mo ago
> For instance: In large codebases, consistency is more important than “good design” But this is exactly the type of generic software design advice the article warns us about! And it mostly results in all all the bad software practices w
773.
by eviks 10mo ago
X, Y, Z are not public infrastructure, why should payments be any different?
774.
by eviks 10mo ago
Funny that you mention performance > For instance, Apple's SwiftUI is reportedly slow[1][2][3][4],
775.
by eviks 10mo ago
> and Microsoft tends to abandon each new UI framework every five years So use the old one? Your first link literally mentions two ancient frameworks that are not abandoned (win32 and MFC) But you're right > So, it's more us
776.
by eviks 10mo ago
> Good luck trying to insert something inside of “article-heading” but after “article-quote” on the first try. You don't need much, but an editor - collapse the sections to get the view as small as in the blog snippet, and then you&
777.
by eviks 10mo ago
> with their exceptional quality and functionality. This was never true, for example, taking this simple criterion of readability: > would be really helpful if I could read clearly what’s on my display Look at the device's names
778.
by eviks 10mo ago
> Unacceptable for the premium you pay for Apple software. Unacceptable for any software one is paying for. You don't pay anything for the software, so the quality matches
779.
by eviks 10mo ago
> constant focus for us is making applications packaged as snap feel fully native. > laying the groundwork So with constant focus, how many more years before the feeling is reached on top of that groundwork . The map is rather fuzzy
780.
by eviks 10mo ago
Interesting, the main license doesn't mention the limit, maybe that's why the op got confused https://github.com/apple/ml-sharp/blob/main/LICENSE

More ›