eviks

12 ms·

301.
by eviks 5mo ago
So you must use both hands for that, and stretch your right hand to reach the numeric row, and also blocking some app combos? How is that better than getting Autohotkey?
302.
by eviks 5mo ago
No, keys can have multiple uses, so nothing is ruled out. For example, you can have a short or double tap of the left Control to do something without the negative effect of affecting your Ctrl+X combos. So no hijacking, but a peaceful coexi
303.
by eviks 5mo ago
The reason for not using the good idea of a single key per language isn't explained, and Caps lock is fundamentally less convenient (it's a sideway pinky key, rather unergonomic compared to a thumb Ctrl modifier)
304.
by eviks 5mo ago
Like this https://hitchdev.com/strictyaml/ ?
305.
by eviks 5mo ago
This is still noisy, wasting 3 symbols to end where an invisible line end would suffice
306.
by eviks 5mo ago
> everybody else is swapping between several different computers, and you need the synchronization? So you do understand it!
307.
by eviks 5mo ago
That's what the backups are for, and also local password copies remain even without internet/subscription?
308.
by eviks 5mo ago
No, if that were true, there would be no extension support on non-mobile
309.
by eviks 5mo ago
> If you have been using Vivaldi for years, you have your setup exactly as you want it and you would not trade it for anything. You wouldn't be able to even if you wanted because there is no good way to export/import your chang
310.
by eviks 5mo ago
Do you have an actual list of arguments with the steps you take to boil them down to ignorance? CSS is a design system, as like any system it can be poorly designed. Poorly designed systems require more effort to operate, and you can even c
311.
by eviks 5mo ago
> it does follow from the simple fact that a fired employee with access to company systems is a security risk. No, employees that can wipe 96 databases are a security risk, even when they're employed. But of course it's easier
312.
by eviks 5mo ago
They can't do it at scale, they can only mandate it at scale
313.
by eviks 5mo ago
"There is no honor among elites"
314.
by eviks 5mo ago
Is any of this specific to a link vs tyre original full-pathed sudo?
315.
by eviks 5mo ago
That's the magic of Laws!
316.
by eviks 5mo ago
You can set the permissions so that the attacker can't modify it?
317.
by eviks 5mo ago
As many as fit in a period of time it takes a better generation of developers to grow up
318.
by eviks 5mo ago
And maintaining high level of service availability!
319.
by eviks 5mo ago
Why not make a proper link /sudo so you don't have to type out the full path every time, which is very inconvenient? (but the fact that such workarounds are needed still means it's a theater)
320.
by eviks 5mo ago
With you overall, but given the toxicity of the fumes some quality / rated fume extraction might be the one area where cheap/self made item isn't worth it
321.
by eviks 5mo ago
Cute, but make up your own term instead of polluting the existing one. > For instance, would you really want to speed up time spent with your loved ones? First of, do you really think about productivity when doing the positive thing you
322.
by eviks 5mo ago
Then don't suggest unusable services?
323.
by eviks 5mo ago
> But it's expensive, complicated and time-consuming to maintain But it's also a valuable pot of data honey you can boost your wonder AI with, so where is the plight? > For free And without revenue sharing > have any ki
324.
by eviks 5mo ago
Indeed, if you don't know anything about use, you can't say much about usability.
325.
by eviks 5mo ago
> What happened to practicing internet hygiene? Nothing happened, it never worked, and the more people got exposed to the internet, the more obvious it was, your personal RAT history notwithstanding. Post your own hygiene list in some se
326.
by eviks 6mo ago
Because a box is an intuitive way to limit the blast radius of arbitrary code? But the wasn't a requirement, I'd be fine with sandbox-free secure plugin systems
327.
by eviks 6mo ago
The first trade-off is not precisely stated, you can do "both" with user choice. In this case it would be: no plugin has "all filesystem access" unless user explicitly approves it, and that approval steers the user to a
328.
by eviks 6mo ago
To make an actual counter, you need numbers. If only a tiny niche of users use it without community plugins, then yes, it's unusable (in a practical definition of the term)
329.
by eviks 6mo ago
What are the reasons behind the fact that almost all of these plugin systems are so poorly engineered? Is it too much work (ie, there are no good plugin development frameworks that already enable proper isolation/permission capabilitie
330.
by eviks 6mo ago
> Pick one, you obviously can’t have both! Obviously you can, and you actually could earlier where you could click a bypass button for a specific app without any of this terminal nonsense > turn it off on their machine in ten seconds

More ›