euroPoor

9 ms·

31.
by euroPoor 7y ago
She’s got the same level of understanding of Foucault and Derrida as Jordan Peterson, ie. ill-informed and superficial. What a shame to call these people clear-sighted when they clearly not only misread Continental philosophers but it becom
32.
by euroPoor 7y ago
Do you plan on extending the product offering? Edit: Do you use FIX API for the exchanges that provide it?
33.
by euroPoor 7y ago
This is one of many cases, cf https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02121-6
34.
by euroPoor 7y ago
And this kind of comment is where the disinformation starts. Looking at history not even at climate science journals settles the argument: Earth Summit was 1992, Kyoto Protocol was 1997. Climate change already was enough of a thing to have
35.
by euroPoor 7y ago
> And their results are contradictory and disappointing so far. Absolutely not. Where did we fail? Listening to scientists 50 years ago that had the data already. Changing our infrastructure while we had the time. Signing treaties for 30
36.
by euroPoor 7y ago
You put it in your question, right? I’d like to see a study that EXPLICITLY correlates political views and activism with measures of ‘bad science’ like no citations, impossible reproducibility etc
37.
by euroPoor 7y ago
That’s the point of competitive academia, no? To have people try different stuff and to converge to a pratical solution when there’s no provably exact one. So of course climate scientists will try a universe of models to get better at predi
38.
by euroPoor 7y ago
I was not talking about bad science in general. I could say that in general, science seems to be in crisis [1] and pinning it down to people whose political affiliation does not suit your needs is reductive. Also, because there’s some diff
39.
by euroPoor 7y ago
I’m doubting what parent says, why would I need to disprove if they’re going by handwavy articles and personal anecdata?
40.
by euroPoor 7y ago
Then let’s see the evidence for bias, for bad science being done by mostly leftwing or leftist people.
41.
by euroPoor 7y ago
You can keep spamming the same links but it does only so much to solidfy your position.
42.
by euroPoor 7y ago
I’m just waiting for someone to throw in ‘cultural marxism’ in this thread. Sure, you may believe that some departments at university skew left but I still need to see evidence that this is a fact for all universities across the board and t
43.
by euroPoor 7y ago
If that's so clear could you provide sources to sustain that claim (with which I disagree strongly)?
44.
by euroPoor 7y ago
Here's a tentative paper regarding your point https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/10108/...
45.
by euroPoor 7y ago
@mods please delete edit: see my other comment with the sartre quote edit2: actually you may leave this comment up as an example of how antisemites sound like online - it shows exactly the behaviour described in the quote
46.
by euroPoor 7y ago
Yeah, I'm going to need proof on that. Political extremism is, like, a European invention. How about this https://taz.de/taz-Recherche-auf-Englisch/!5558072/ or this https://www.nytimes.com/20
47.
by euroPoor 7y ago
It's always worked that way. That's why fascistoid ideologies are so dangerous. It gives you a 'humorous' out of a dire situation where the 'humor' is dehumanizing to whoever the ideology deems 'other&#x27