Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ethbr0
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
66 ms
·
781.
▲
by
ethbr0
4y ago
What would you have used (prior to affordable switches) instead of CSMA/CD?
782.
▲
by
ethbr0
4y ago
To build on your comment, although it's been years since I studied Ethernet in depth... - (On the bus thread) Ethernet started from an assumption of bad behavior (out of spec cabling, misbehaving clients, etc.) and tighten requirements
783.
▲
by
ethbr0
4y ago
> "Ohh, you must be using a newer version, where the feature was removed". Only it was never there. To be fair, that's a decent approximation of the response humans give when confronted with evidence their memory doesn&#
784.
▲
by
ethbr0
4y ago
Software/hardware co-evolution. Wouldn't be the first time we went down that road to good effect. For anything that can be run remotely, it'll always be deployed and optimized server-side first. Higher utilization means mor
785.
▲
by
ethbr0
4y ago
Eh, little of column A, little of column B on the "conned." They were offered a contract, took it, got something (a home they probably couldn't afford), and then lost their home when rates exploded. "Conned" seems a
786.
▲
by
ethbr0
4y ago
See: nuclear power
787.
▲
by
ethbr0
4y ago
2008 showed us what happens when idiocy and fraud become commonplace and without consequence. Better a few lose their shirts, such that others maintain a healthy dose of fear to motivate due diligence.
788.
▲
by
ethbr0
4y ago
If counterparties bought Credit Suisse’s AT1s without reading the terms, and therefore failing to protect themselves against risk, they were idiots and deserve what they get -- nothing. For starters, if they misunderstand how something work
789.
▲
by
ethbr0
4y ago
> The Paris accord of 2015 comes to mind: the largest emitter by capita withdrawed within a few years Which emitter would that be? Because if you're talking about the US, it withdrew for ~3 months (11/04/2020 - 1/20
790.
▲
by
ethbr0
4y ago
Because there's a part of HN too young to appreciate your comment, it's a reference to a debate in Clerks about independent contractors working on the Death Star II: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iQdDRrcAOjA
791.
▲
by
ethbr0
4y ago
I am not an international diplomat, but my understanding is that international treaties on large issues are usually divided into two types: frameworks and protocols. Frameworks essentially state "This is something we all want, and here
792.
▲
by
ethbr0
4y ago
Various protocols under CLRTAP. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_on_Long-Range_Tra... Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation (the basis for modern high seas
793.
▲
by
ethbr0
4y ago
Calling for diplomacy in a war of aggression where the aggressor has claimed annexation of the defender's territory means... what? What is there to negotiate?
794.
▲
by
ethbr0
4y ago
Imho, if WikiLeaks had focused on being the Craigslist of information, without attempting to market themselves, they would have gotten a lot more public support. You can't transparently publish information and have an opinion.
795.
▲
by
ethbr0
4y ago
> If they merge and nothing changes, you have 130 000 employees It'll be curious what the Swiss government does about employee retention in the forced marriage.
796.
▲
by
ethbr0
4y ago
Do review comments get publicly shared under the previous model? I'm curious if a large part of this push-back is "I don't want to be held publicly responsible for my review comments..." (the over-taxed, unpaid ones) ...
797.
▲
by
ethbr0
4y ago
Making mistakes is one of the most important parts of college, but sadly another one that's being torn down by over-zealous administration and campus policing. My father went to a small, rural school whose local police force generally
798.
▲
by
ethbr0
4y ago
My take was that was always essence of the "dogs smell Terminators" plot element. Skynet could make Terminators that looked and acted human, but didn't put the effort into making them smell human. Unlike us, a dog'
799.
▲
by
ethbr0
4y ago
I heard a great quip about the way people misreason about AI capabilities. Announcement: "AI can play chess!" Public: "People can play chess. And AI can play chess. People can also X. Therefore AI can also X." ... Ignori
800.
▲
by
ethbr0
4y ago
Would they? I don't spend a lot of time on niche forums these days, but the question boils down to "Would you not accrue positive karma over time from posting?" I'm sure there are forums out there sufficiently expert tha
801.
▲
by
ethbr0
4y ago
It's a fair question as to whether the problem space of "the world" is different in just amount or sufficiently different in kind to flummox AI. I expect more complex problems will be mapped/abstracted to lower cardinali
802.
▲
by
ethbr0
4y ago
> What happens when ALL of our decisions can be assigned an accuracy score? Human work becomes more like Star Trek interactions with computers -- a sequence of queries (commoditized information), followed by human cognition, that drive
803.
▲
by
ethbr0
4y ago
That doesn't seem different-in-kind. Spammed GPT content will eventually infect them too.
804.
▲
by
ethbr0
4y ago
In answer, how frequently does "append Reddit" appear as a top comment on a "Google search is ad-optimized garbage now" article?
805.
▲
by
ethbr0
4y ago
I thought it was fascinatingly NFTish... just way earlier.
806.
▲
by
ethbr0
4y ago
Anyone who believes the value of actual-crypto is going to fall, and therefore wants to be out of it and in USDC?
807.
▲
by
ethbr0
4y ago
It's an important distinction as we move into a statically-usually-true AI future (vs the deterministically-true recent past). It doesn't matter until it does. Showing pretty pictures of the moon on Instagram? Doesn't matter.
808.
▲
by
ethbr0
4y ago
It's fair to say physics-defying. The physical properties of diffraction establish fundamental minimum limits on the requisite lens aperture diameter for a given resolution. See: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ang
809.
▲
KRE (regional bank ETF)
(finance.yahoo.com)
1 points
by
ethbr0
4y ago
|
0 comments
810.
▲
by
ethbr0
4y ago
> it would appear that Google is a tech company that isn't actually very good at business Their primary product (ads) sells itself. So as a company they haven't ever had to become good at business -- in the interacting-with-o
More ›