etchalon

8 ms·

61.
by etchalon 3mo ago
In what industry is Tesla #1 in?
62.
by etchalon 3mo ago
Look, you ate the lunch. The company has to track those resources.
63.
by etchalon 3mo ago
I think you're confusing this specific study with a different study, which did use duplicative resumes, and has been repeated: https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/0002828042002561
64.
by etchalon 3mo ago
There are essentially two definitions of racism at this point. The colloquially version, which means "prejudice based on race" and a second version, which specific groups and people have advocated for, which means something like &
65.
by etchalon 3mo ago
I'd have a problem with that too. In fact, I'd have a problem not being allowed to use cash. I am deeply inconsistent on this.
66.
by etchalon 3mo ago
I should be worried about this, but Anthropic's products are a paid product. You can't use them without providing some identifying information, unless you're going out of your way to provide them inaccurate information. I gen
67.
by etchalon 3mo ago
Don't have much to add beyond being grateful for everyone working to call this out, with a hope some lawsuits drop and our SCOTUS doesn't decide racial bias in AI is fine because we can't prove the AI is racist in its heart.
68.
by etchalon 4mo ago
Holy shit, I just realize you linked the wrong US vs Yang case. You googled, someone mentioned US v Yang, and you found a Seventh Court decision about a different case altogether, that had nothing to do with ALPR data or Carpenter, and link
69.
by etchalon 4mo ago
No it didn't. You keep insisting it "set a precedent" when the opinion explicitly cites precedent to say they don't need to set any precedent or make a novel ruling because existing precedent already establishes that the
70.
by etchalon 4mo ago
... There is nothing waiting to be seen. The court ruled, as hundreds of cases have been ruled before, that Fourth Amendment protections only apply if there is an expectation of privacy. Its opinion made clear that they were ignoring whethe
71.
by etchalon 4mo ago
... the entire point of the decision was whether a person has an expectation of privacy in a rental car outside of the rental period. The court didn't come down in favor of warrantless use of ALPR data. It said that the defendant did n
72.
by etchalon 4mo ago
... you should probably read that opinion and maybe some legal analysis on what precedents it established. Specifically, that it established none. Schmidt was explicitly about license plate reader data and whether a locality could install a
73.
by etchalon 4mo ago
If you're going to Google a rebuttal to sound smart, please read the opinion before you do. The Ninth Circuit in US v Yang specifically did not rule on the applicability of Carpenter or whether ALPR's GPS database was sufficiently
74.
by etchalon 4mo ago
To be clear, ballots are anonymous, and voter rolls are not universally accessible to all offices or functions of any given government. Different localities have different laws regarding the transparency of voting records, with varying degr
75.
by etchalon 4mo ago
At no point did I say it could de-anonymize ballots. You claimed ballots provided the government with the information they needed to know who voted. I pointed that is untrue. Ballots explicitly do not. The fact you posted that tells you kno
76.
by etchalon 4mo ago
You're missing the part where, for that to work, we have a government with access to a massive surveillance system capable of identifying and tracking the population at scale. And you're missing that, instead of specifically ident
77.
by etchalon 4mo ago
You understand why that's worse, right?
78.
by etchalon 4mo ago
In America, yes. Obviously in other places, no.
79.
by etchalon 4mo ago
You can probably do that, so long as you're doing it on property you own.
80.
by etchalon 4mo ago
This seems incredibly logical if the application is claiming its IP has value without accounts/revenue that justify that value.
81.
by etchalon 4mo ago
Fair.
82.
by etchalon 4mo ago
Summary - Get a PS5 Pro.
83.
by etchalon 4mo ago
Do you want Terminators? Because this is how you get Terminators.
84.
by etchalon 4mo ago
CEOs generally suffer zero consequences for their decisions, unless that decision costs someone real money.
85.
by etchalon 4mo ago
Turns out racists love tech news too.
86.
by etchalon 4mo ago
Conservatives views are not anti-science, so much as they are a demand that science only be allowed to answer certain questions, and only answer those questions in specific ways.
87.
by etchalon 4mo ago
"Liberal views" are not anti-science on race. "Liberal views" tend to reject the reductionism and selectivity of "race science" that points to arbitrarily defined measurements like IQ as being the sole explanat
88.
by etchalon 4mo ago
Why does this feel like GraphQL demanding everyone else solve their problems?
89.
by etchalon 4mo ago
I find it easier, with this administration, to assume corruption first, incompetence second, maliciousness third and all other reasonings only after several rounds of reporting and evidence.
90.
by etchalon 4mo ago
I mean Pages is free.

More ›