estel

78 ms·

721.
by estel 16y ago
Isn't there an extent to which this worked for this author simply because his actions were more of an outlier within the industry, rather than the norm? And it was perhaps entirely because it was an unusual exception (though not without pre
722.
by estel 16y ago
Personally it's more of a "I want to see what website I'm about to open in my browser" ideology than pithy moral meanings. But sure!
723.
by estel 16y ago
Change your font, please!
724.
by estel 16y ago
No flash policies seem consistently ignored, often by people who don't know how to manipulate their cameras to turn the flash off, so I wouldn't hold hope that this would make a huge difference. (People still go around museums constantly us
725.
by estel 16y ago
Would you look at that though, no downvotes in this here thread.
726.
by estel 16y ago
Sorry, where did they do this? Some of the examples they gave, certainly, didn't conform to all of their tips - only the one that they were demonstrating at the time, but I didn't see any contradiction in the text?
727.
by estel 16y ago
Hasn't this already been available for a while as the "Site Overlay" option? Sure, it's slightly reskinned and relaunched, but I'm unsure what this is offering that hasn't already been around for years.
728.
by estel 16y ago
Its non-inclusion throws this whole demonstration into question, imo.
729.
by estel 16y ago
They mourn the loss of the potential of what their lives might have been, not their accomplishments.
730.
by estel 16y ago
I doubt many people would question that he has significant liquid assets, I was just pointing out the relevance of the question. For a business owner on his scale, I'd imagine that the vast majority of his wealth would be tied up in busines
731.
by estel 16y ago
Presumably it would affect the amount he is actually able to immediately use to support those in need.
732.
by estel 16y ago
I seem to just be getting 503'd. Is that my firewall, or has the collective weight of, uhh... HN bought it down?
733.
by estel 16y ago
Doesn't that depend on what the website is trying to achieve? Clearly there are plenty of sites out there whose functionality is necessarily dependant on JS. As long as they make clear that this is the case and what the website is supposed
734.
by estel 16y ago
I think he asks permission when it suits him. Given his profile as an artist, I'd imagine he mostly wants to work on projects of the sort of scale that require permission from an organisation of some sort. I don't think he has an objection
735.
by estel 16y ago
London and Wales? Was this some Ken Livingstone law? :P
736.
by estel 16y ago
I think he's missing world poverty. Whilst noone really supports it, it's entirely morally reprehensible that we don't do more as a society to eradicate poverty around the world.
737.
by estel 16y ago
I asses all types of programming languages.
738.
by estel 16y ago
I believe that non-profits on the whole are more likely to work to directly "do good" than for-profits. Whilst it might mean I end up "supporting" a cause that I personally would not subscribe to, as a broad definition it seems suitable to
739.
by estel 16y ago
Witchcraft! (That's awesome)
740.
by estel 16y ago
I've started to see some best-practice-if-you-ignore-user-expectation guides out there which say that allowing the domain to ignore the www is Not A Good Idea. I don't really know why this is the case, though.
741.
by estel 16y ago
Huh? They support RDFa, Microformats and Microdata (relatively) equally.
742.
by estel 16y ago
Then why bring it up here so soon? At least wait for a response :/
743.
by estel 16y ago
No. Not really.
744.
by estel 16y ago
They do give you the choice to display the button as "Recommend" instead. In my opinion, both "Like" and "Recommend" would be perfectly suitable names for this feature were it not for the ability of those pages to post to your feed thereaft
745.
by estel 16y ago
Down again. Just paste it into a comment :P
746.
by estel 16y ago
Just watched that, can't believe I'd never seen it before. Awesome!