esrauch

118 ms·

691.
by esrauch 8y ago
I think most people would assume it was just a heavily photoshopped photograph.
692.
by esrauch 8y ago
I'm not sure what you mean. If they have a business arrangement it probably explicitly includes a one way transfer of accounts into PS4. Sony would clearly be willing to pay for this (both minimize friction getting in and maximize it g
693.
by esrauch 8y ago
They probably are contractually bound to have this behavior with Sony in exchange for promotion or cash. It doesn't benefit Epic in any way and it benefits Sony a lot.
694.
by esrauch 8y ago
I think you misunderstand me: the point is you can't criticize someone got saying "higher than the current rate" if they are just always advocating 40% and that is always higher than what is actually tried. They would clearly
695.
by esrauch 8y ago
Can you explain why the idea is crap? Broadly it seems bad if it takes a software developer to make even the most trivial app.
696.
by esrauch 8y ago
Can you justify that? It sounds like some sort of "efficient market hypothesis" but "efficient government" which isn't a phrase many people would use outside of a joke. It easily could be that the "best" t
697.
by esrauch 8y ago
It takes a nation-state to do it and nation-states have an interest in doing so. Copperhead maybe could be comprised in the short term by just any thug with a led pipe making threats but those thugs have much softer targets than that so why
698.
by esrauch 8y ago
The code is available under non-commercial licensing. It sounds like ownership beyond that is going to be sketchy enough that no other licensing is likely safe to assume under any condition short of a definitive resolution in court or anoth
699.
by esrauch 8y ago
I think this strategy can backfire on some people: if you think someone might have messaged you or tagged you in any of 5 different apps you might just cycle through actually opening them.
700.
by esrauch 8y ago
I think most people would assume the marketing meant "can spray at any angle, even the hardest case of upside down". I knew I did when reading this thread until I saw this comment.
701.
by esrauch 8y ago
Funny, I hate Concur. I can easily imagine how it could be worse though.
702.
by esrauch 8y ago
The same bug repros for array[method()] += "string"; where method is invoked twice instead of once.
703.
by esrauch 8y ago
Facebook officially sends arbitrary friends data through the Android/Samung APIs in the normal course of operating the official FB app. It likely also locally caches a lot of data in a format and on-device storage that Samsung could ar
704.
by esrauch 8y ago
Surely it is only giving blackberry the information if you type in your login credentials on a blackberry right? I don't see how the situation is actually different now: if you run the official Facebook app on your Galaxh phone then Sa
705.
by esrauch 8y ago
I keep getting humans every time, but the one bot I got said this: Me: If you push your finger into a cake will the cake move relative to the table it is on? Stranger: Cake will table
706.
by esrauch 8y ago
Warcraft 1 you could select multiple but you had to hold ctrl when doing it so I think many people didn't realize.
707.
by esrauch 8y ago
What is the post-Soviet era peace built on?
708.
by esrauch 8y ago
Messenger is really the only way that people contact me
709.
by esrauch 8y ago
Most languages have no concept of undefined behavior and they still have compilers and runtimes that can do a huge amount of optimizations.
710.
by esrauch 8y ago
Yeah, I just meant that the move seems to pretty clearly be "no more API access for consumer apps, only for internal enterprise type use cases".
711.
by esrauch 8y ago
Without this verification you have high confidence no one can know. After this, you are suddenly trusting companies to do the right thing. Renting a porn vhs and having the guy photocopy and file your ID is a much bigger deterrant than just
712.
by esrauch 8y ago
The difference is that essentially no one minds a guy glancing at their id and handing it back, and no one cares if your coworker happens to see you going into a bar. The law is a filter because of the obvious chilling effect: do you really
713.
by esrauch 8y ago
No analogy is perfect. In this case, there are questions that legitimately have no definitive answer (like what is "large scale"), so it is more like the cheese maker genuinely doesn't know whether their milk would be audited
714.
by esrauch 8y ago
Presumably a publicly released app isn't going for a 25 subscriptions at $14/account deal, they must be targeting some special enterprise/social marketing space. It isn't obvious that a random consumer would expect to pa
715.
by esrauch 8y ago
The paper isn't self-evidently fradulent to me. Since it wasn't part of the discussion in the dedicated hn thread it seems like you just have some special insight to be able to make such a strong statement?
716.
by esrauch 8y ago
Sorry, I meant physical mail not email.
717.
by esrauch 8y ago
Can you justify that? It doesn't seem like that was the consensus on the HN thread about it.
718.
by esrauch 8y ago
Almost no junk mail can be easily unsubscribed from in my experience.
719.
by esrauch 8y ago
Local plants vs imported plants is counter-intuitively not always straightforward. Inefficient farming in worse climates can sometimes use more fuel than farming it elsewhere and shipping it, transport only accounts for a small portion of
720.
by esrauch 8y ago
The issue at hand seems to be about suppression of information (information that happens to be about abortion), not pro-abortion.

More ›