Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
esquivalience
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
91.
▲
by
esquivalience
3y ago
Can you please post a source for the ivermectin point? If I understand your comment you're suggesting that it is effective against covid, but I may be misunderstanding.
92.
▲
by
esquivalience
3y ago
The difference is that a bill is saying "I've done this work for you: now pay me". Or "I've given you these products: now pay me". But an expense claim is saying "When I was doing what you asked me to do,
93.
▲
by
esquivalience
3y ago
I don't know about the substance enough to comment, but did want to remark that I saw no sarcasm in the post you replied to.
94.
▲
by
esquivalience
3y ago
This feels like a good outcome for the machine. It can't tell whether you intended it to be a cat, and you told it ogre, which is after all a made-up creature. But it did take note of what it could.
95.
▲
by
esquivalience
3y ago
In typography the term diphthong also. Means the character itself - "a digraph representing the sound of a diphthong or single vowel". I can't speak to the possible typo in the word itself, but I believe it might be a old spe
96.
▲
by
esquivalience
3y ago
I thought the approach was interesting. It's being used here as an empathy engine: what might (other people) say?
97.
▲
by
esquivalience
3y ago
I believe it exists and here is a list of reasons for it: https://fonts.google.com/knowledge/introducing_type/introduc...
98.
▲
by
esquivalience
3y ago
The dividing line here is that it's fallacious to argue that something is true simply based on authority. That doesn't hold where there are external cogent reasons for following that authority (eg. in this example: it's a d
99.
▲
by
esquivalience
3y ago
thanks
100.
▲
by
esquivalience
3y ago
Just wanted to point out that trust is already embedded in your scenario: where you say "you know", that really means that you trust, based on experience. The experience that gives rise to that knowledge is the same sort of thing
101.
▲
by
esquivalience
3y ago
I'm interested in your comment about copyright being proposed for stability. Can you direct me to a source please? If you have a reference or a hint for further research, I'd like to read into it more.
102.
▲
by
esquivalience
3y ago
Why not call passwords private words? We've been using words even longer. The answer is that they're being used to pass an authentication challenge. Pass + key is no different.
103.
▲
by
esquivalience
4y ago
Post to HN asking for tutorials!
104.
▲
by
esquivalience
4y ago
Is it this quote you mean? Amendment 82, page 10, line 25, at end insert— ‘(3A) Content under subsection (3) includes content that may result in serious harm or death to a child while crossing the English Channel with the aim of entering th
105.
▲
by
esquivalience
4y ago
If the ammunition touches paper when shot, it detonated
106.
▲
by
esquivalience
4y ago
I don't think this should be taken as legal advice. Though it reflects the strict wording of the contract, most jurisdictions apply a reasonable filter to this. We also don't know what law the contract is subject to unless I misse
107.
▲
by
esquivalience
4y ago
Isn't it rather that the market will follow individual choices? Such that if you can change the individual, the market will follow (and in this case, has done).
108.
▲
by
esquivalience
4y ago
I spotted that but thought your original worked nicely anwyay (it is silent on these things)
109.
▲
by
esquivalience
4y ago
Unregistered doesn't mean unowned. It just means that the land registry, an official government register of ownership, doesn't have an entry (yet). The registration system was created in 1925 to replace the previous system of trac
110.
▲
by
esquivalience
4y ago
Sure, I can't say - but when was that made part of Rec 709? I suppose that may well be what it invented... Edit - to clarify better that what I'm trying to convey is that the time and context matters too, and the claims have to be
111.
▲
by
esquivalience
4y ago
I checked what you said about the 967 patent. I'm afraid it's just wrong. You quoted some of the initial part and missed out the bit which actually describes what's happening: "an image processing system configured to pe
112.
▲
by
esquivalience
4y ago
It's as if we read different articles. He literally writes that he made "A series of mistakes that could've probably been easily prevented."
113.
▲
by
esquivalience
4y ago
Great observation
114.
▲
by
esquivalience
5y ago
That is horribly plausible!
115.
▲
by
esquivalience
5y ago
That first link is a redirect spiral through multiple interstitial ads. Enjoyed the rest of the comment though!
116.
▲
by
esquivalience
5y ago
I believe that is a fair translation of the actual Chinese word for pink!
117.
▲
The fake Twitter account of “Marina Ovsyannikova”
(davidallengreen.com)
139 points
by
esquivalience
5y ago
|
82 comments
118.
▲
by
esquivalience
5y ago
This matters in the article because its an unusual data point, easily investigated.
119.
▲
by
esquivalience
5y ago
Disagree. They provided context allowing people to understand the reason for what would otherwise seem a bizarre set of steps that seem to cure the problem in the meantime. It's clear and direct.
120.
▲
by
esquivalience
5y ago
This is all sorts of meta.
More ›