Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
esperent
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
61.
▲
by
esperent
2mo ago
I just looked it up and you're right, but chargeback is like a fraud dispute then? I did have to make a dispute on a completely fake charge on my card once, through visa, and it took weeks, they denied it once, then they threatened me
62.
▲
by
esperent
2mo ago
> It also told me that in a spec it generated that I wasn't allowed to allow it to ignore a requirement and proceed to the next task This happened to me ages ago with Opus. I added a note to the agents file saying that explicit user
63.
▲
by
esperent
2mo ago
My mother uses it for everything. The small phone screen is hard for her eyes, she doesn't really need a laptop and the tablet is just right. She still carries a phone with her but I can imagine if she replaced both tablet and phone wi
64.
▲
by
esperent
2mo ago
You can't chargeback on debit cards which most of the world uses so this point is moot for most people. I've never owned a credit card in my life and while it's not exactly a hot topic of conversation I don't think most
65.
▲
by
esperent
2mo ago
Why? I don't know this person.
66.
▲
by
esperent
2mo ago
What's the difference? If it's SSR it's happening on the server, the only benefit of using JS is ergonomics. Ruby is fine otherwise.
67.
▲
by
esperent
2mo ago
React apps with SSR is standard these days.
68.
▲
by
esperent
2mo ago
> In my Linux boxes, I just plug in a standard mouse and get the standard functions. That'll work with Logitech mice too. It's only for all the extra buttons and functions that you need their software.
69.
▲
by
esperent
2mo ago
What would make this useful to me is integrating it into the tools I use. That's Pi, but I would say if you set it up for Claude Code or Codex that would get you more initial users.
70.
▲
by
esperent
2mo ago
> A growing body of carefully conducted research is building a compelling case for tai chi ... And yet this article doesn't link a single one. This is just a marketing post, nothing interesting here. I'd expect better from a un
71.
▲
by
esperent
2mo ago
The basic idea here looks interesting and is easy to understand but what I'm not understanding is why it's a standalone app. Is this supposed to replace e.g. Claude desktop? Or can it plug in to other systems like Claude Code, Cod
72.
▲
by
esperent
2mo ago
That's always going to be a trade off with anything like this so I guess it's better to think of it as an alternative to compaction. Another use case that comes to mind is that sometimes I'll include some detail early in a co
73.
▲
by
esperent
2mo ago
I got some amazing photos through a set of eclipse viewing glasses on my Vivo x300 pro. If I'd been a bit more organized and set up a stand and taped the glasses onto the phone I think I could have taken a video of the whole thing in i
74.
▲
by
esperent
2mo ago
Wired.com is such a trash publication. Everything has to be presented in such a breathless, hyperbolic, drawn out way. All the articles pretend to be long form, in depth, but if you actual read them there's nothing except hyperbole and
75.
▲
by
esperent
2mo ago
> It seems to be most common with Aspie writing That's quite a claim, do you have any proof of this?
76.
▲
by
esperent
2mo ago
I'm sure someone other company will make exactly those glaces, obvious and stylish recording devices. In the meantime, it's quite telling that Meta is choosing not to. They want recording to be constant, impossible to detect, an
77.
▲
by
esperent
2mo ago
I always set thinking to high for the main session or subagents doing audits, medium for everything else. I think xhigh or max has a place if I'm doing something genuinely complex. But in general use it's slow and I have the impre
78.
▲
by
esperent
2mo ago
> My codex sessions now easily drain a subscription within 24 hours. I have the same problem. But I think that codex subscription limits have dropped a lot recently. They were doing a promotion through April/May of 2x usage which is
79.
▲
by
esperent
2mo ago
Can you give an an example of what you mean, because I'm not understanding how that's possible in HTML, even without accessibility.
80.
▲
by
esperent
2mo ago
- two lines for the button (one of which is just the closing tag) - one line for an svg icon - four lines for the tooltip.
81.
▲
by
esperent
2mo ago
Microsoft web apps are sluggish on my i7 with 64gb of RAM. But it's not performance issues, I think. It's networking, they have some crazy interconnected backend spread across about 20 systems and everything you do is going to nee
82.
▲
by
esperent
2mo ago
As with so many experiments, the study itself is clear and testing something valid, but when it gets shared somewhere like reddit/HN/Facebook etc. everyone takes the broadest possible, unintended reading. - study: we tested speci
83.
▲
by
esperent
2mo ago
> You can board up a helluva lot more stuff in a week than in two days TFA says they might be able to predict one extra day ahead (three days instead of two). No prediction system will ever give you a week's notice on a typhoon.
84.
▲
by
esperent
2mo ago
How does predicting a typhoon prevent billions in damage? It could save thousands of lives because people can be evacuated if you can predict a few hours or a day further ahead, or the path more accurately. You can save some damage by movin
85.
▲
by
esperent
2mo ago
This is like getting angry at cookie banners instead of all the companies tracking and selling your data. You're complaining about the symptom (needing to have these checks) not the cause (if they don't, 99% of their traffic will
86.
▲
by
esperent
3mo ago
> looks performative That's one of those phrases you can use to dismiss opposing viewpoints without actually engaging with them.
87.
▲
by
esperent
3mo ago
For some value of "work out" anywhere between " human utopia that spreads across the stars " to " we destroy everything in a ball of nuclear fire and only microbes survive ", yes, it will. The universe will kee
88.
▲
by
esperent
3mo ago
It would be my reaction if we're discussing a blog post from OpenAI, yes. I would be looking at it extremely critically, wondering what they're misrepresenting to make it look cheaper, easier, and why they're trying to make i
89.
▲
by
esperent
3mo ago
Nobody is claiming the results are false. We're saying look critically at the claims for how it was done, that it only cost $2000, etc. it would be extremely easy to run 100 sessions that failed, each costing ~$2000, and then just publ
90.
▲
by
esperent
3mo ago
> deliberate misleading “lack of transparency” etc It's a marketing post from a huge company. Only the naive would view it uncritically without assuming it's been written carefully to present the results in the best possible l
More ›