esjeon

28 ms·

361.
by esjeon 4y ago
> They are blackboxes for the normal user the same way as a smartphone is a blackbox. You can't take that approach. The current NN techniques are blackbox-by-nature, and are blockbox to everyone including the devs. Proprietary so
362.
by esjeon 4y ago
Yup, I think this is the pretty much describes the limitation of today's AIs. They are gigantic statistics machines at best. It's still amazing how far we can get with this technique, but we know where they stop getting better.
363.
by esjeon 4y ago
This is just a personal viewpoint, but I think the era of "just ship it" will be gone after a decade or so. * Software "development" skill will become so common and cheap that simple tools won't get any market. * Th
364.
by esjeon 4y ago
> OP is obviously incredibly talented, fine, but maybe someone at Solana could have spent a month working on it full time? Exactly. OP certainly is talented and did a great job up there. However, Solana is simply too important to fail li
365.
by esjeon 4y ago
A big absurdity I sense here. I'm talking about Solana here, btw. * Considering the money flying around Solana and its heavy dependency on BPF, $100k payout per vuln is reasonable. * Considering the money flying around Solana and its h
366.
by esjeon 4y ago
Plus, people seek different values from their work, and even those values also change over time. So, yeah, what really matters is the number of data points. Still, Google is obviously not the hacker-driven company it used to be 10 years ago
367.
by esjeon 4y ago
Welp, devotion plays the largest role when it comes to enjoying something, and paying for an album already means the person is already devoted into it. Devotion allows juicing out more fun from the same item.
368.
by esjeon 4y ago
GraphQL does solve its problems. It's often very fun to use, and can save a lot of efforts if adopted correctly. However, no matter how good or practical it is, you should mind that it's not "technology" after all. It&#x
369.
by esjeon 5y ago
Yeah, I don't think this is really "passive", mainly because his "works" are quite time-sensitive and short-lived... I'm not saying the OP did something wrong or bad or anything. It just looks more like he work
370.
by esjeon 5y ago
I've just skimmed, but the paper is quite unkind about its internal details (which is very typical for mathies, hahaha). I think the algorithm is non-exact. Say, Theorem 1.1 explicitly mentions probability: > There is an algorithm t
371.
by esjeon 5y ago
Welp, at least, the wire transfer process itself delivered the money to the correct recipient. Now, imagine this: an error in a transfer contract locks away funds, not only from victims, but also from phishers. What a beautiful world to liv
372.
by esjeon 5y ago
No, because DALL-E is only doing statistics, so training based on other DALL-Es doesn't add anything fundamentally new to the dataset. I want to point out that most people actually get creativity wrong . It's an unfortunate truth
373.
by esjeon 5y ago
I'm pretty sure CCP is trying its best to protect itself . It basically wants to be the single source of truth in the country, but algorithms interfere with this goal by providing "bubbles" to users. Once a person falls into
374.
by esjeon 5y ago
Creativity is not challenged here, because it's human who created all those base materials, all those styles, and all those biases. DALL-E simply picks up and mix those biaes, images, and styles, all based on human instruction. Ideas a
375.
by esjeon 5y ago
Why do we stop at texture, where we can generate the whole set of models? Seriously, tho, we need these for VR, which is all about copying everything in the real world into virtual worlds with some twists.
376.
by esjeon 5y ago
Actaully, it’s not really about doing it server-side or client-side. It’s about how to make client render on windows border. CSD is obviously simpler, but that’s when you do bitmap…
377.
by esjeon 5y ago
What people ALWAYS miss is that AI can augment people. This AI is still a tool, and, with it, designers and illustrator can churn out better images faster than before, even without using stock images. It's important to note that we sti
378.
by esjeon 5y ago
Let's be honest this whole thread is f**ed up. A truth is that this guy is irrelevant. It's just your ideas that make him relevant. Just face the reality of your daily lives, and look away from some random stimulant on the net tha
379.
by esjeon 5y ago
Maybe I should put it this way: "2022 is the year of linux desktop!"
380.
by esjeon 5y ago
> Never thought I'd see the day when Wacom would use their Linux support as a selling point. I never thought any consumer-grade product would, lol. Also we recently got Steam Deck out in the market, so maybe Linux is really becoming
381.
by esjeon 5y ago
You need this ... in "the Zone".
382.
by esjeon 5y ago
TBH, I'm very puzzled: is YouTube really that much worth your time and effort? Some might claim it's a kind of movement , or sorta free software, but, to me, it all looks like simply simple piracy, which is a highway to vendor l
383.
by esjeon 5y ago
Not really no-code. Let's be honest. The OP is taking steps just like how an experienced SW developer would. Copilot simply cut the need for reading through documentations. This doesn't really say that Copilot can replace programm
384.
by esjeon 5y ago
Welp, you're downplaying IBM too much. IBM got the product direction right earlier than anyone. Watson is a querying system w/ advanced NLP/IR/KRR capability running on dedicated compute chips, and large corps are more o
385.
by esjeon 5y ago
Welp, it's basically an unregulated market, so whatever possible is possible. Tax evasion, check. Money laundering check. Ponzi scheme, check.
386.
by esjeon 5y ago
I think OP is overgeneralizing a little. Cloud is all about buying resources(IaaS) and functions(SaaS) of your choice. That means, one can purchase storage and traffic like the case here, or CPU time and memory for data processing. One spec
387.
by esjeon 5y ago
> Why in the world would Tesla allow someone whom they employ, to generate bad press while they're still heavily developing a tech. Isn't FSD Beta already not enough negatively covered? Welp, you can’t blame others when you you
388.
by esjeon 5y ago
> Arch Linux Seriously? 1. Paid apps normally support Ubuntu out of box, but it's rarely a case for Arch. AUR is not a "professional" place at any senses. 2. Arch is a rolling distro that breaks completely randomly. Major
389.
by esjeon 5y ago
> 2. Linux: There is an age old Ubuntu bug (which bleeds into many Ubuntu based Distributions) where the installer wipes out the bootloader of a drive that you aren't even installing the OS on. Dear open source community: your deskt
390.
by esjeon 5y ago
Exactly. RTF has been around for ages. Also, it's pretty shocking that people forgot the term "rich-text".

More ›