esMazer

10 ms·

61.
by esMazer 12y ago
I would be interested on this as well!
62.
by esMazer 12y ago
they don't even need to break encryption. Patriot Act.
63.
by esMazer 12y ago
1- tor is broken. 2- they know and use ways to get around encrypting. We got to give them some credit they knew encryption was an issue that at some point they had to dealt with. And they found ways to do just that from the beginning.
64.
by esMazer 12y ago
is it that different from buying bitcoins by meeting physically with someone and paying cash? or do you buy bitcoins from your personal computer? I guess no way will be truly anonymous
65.
by esMazer 12y ago
I think they were referring to the buyers view, where you are referring to the sellers
66.
by esMazer 12y ago
aircraft carrier for drones brilliant!
67.
by esMazer 12y ago
you know you have to
68.
by esMazer 12y ago
this is a really cool idea, however I can see how some people would try to abuse the app playing pranks on other people and the like.. I don't have an iphone so I can't check if there are some ways that the users are verified (bas
69.
by esMazer 12y ago
or hardware DRM
70.
by esMazer 12y ago
same here
71.
by esMazer 12y ago
ohh so this is what I've seen on my coworker computer :)
72.
by esMazer 12y ago
looks interesting, would be interested into understanding how it works. Also got a 404 when I visited http://fetching.io/privacy-policy
73.
by esMazer 12y ago
After reading the post I don't think "they had lost their way" instead they are trying to find ways to help everyone involved.
74.
by esMazer 12y ago
missed opportunity here
75.
by esMazer 12y ago
ohh I get it! Basically there's a market of third party companies and the broker has the liberty to choose to who give all its "traffic"/transactions, but the broker is choosing the company based on the fee it gets inste
76.
by esMazer 12y ago
I read the introduction of the wiki article, but I'm still at a lost.. the third party pays back the broker because it "wants to influence how the broker routes client orders" what? so if I were the broker I would deny or al
77.
by esMazer 12y ago
you could use Homejoy to find a good cleaner and then talk to them directly, they are a contractor and are free to make a contract with anyone they wish.
78.
by esMazer 12y ago
Since you already now this person for more than a year, why keep using Homejoy? You could make a deal with her that benefits both parties (she'd get 100% of the profits and you'd pay less since Homejoy is not in the middle) - just
79.
by esMazer 12y ago
~3-5 years is way too soon. The technology might be ready but the governments (think regulations, traffic laws, car insurance companies, car manufacturers, etc etc etc ) in addition to the public (which is not ready either). Is going to tak
80.
by esMazer 12y ago
data-only plans solve all issues, we don't need "talk" or "texts" to be included. Just carry around a "hotspot" (it get's hard when you have a family plan since it would be to expensive to buy multi
81.
by esMazer 12y ago
or you can use it without login-in
82.
by esMazer 12y ago
Point taken. We as a society should be doing way more to help these people. But then again.. when was the last time you really tried to help someone on the street?
83.
by esMazer 12y ago
why?
84.
by esMazer 12y ago
already changed
85.
by esMazer 12y ago
how do they make money?
86.
by esMazer 12y ago
Security Notification Per company security policy you have been denied access to the website: http://trevorstarick.com/twitter-an-untapped-well-of-potenti... Reason: Not allowed to browse this Botnet site.
87.
by esMazer 12y ago
tapping on the screen worked for me
88.
by esMazer 13y ago
I don't know about any of the "sleep benefits" but as someone that works and enjoys being in front of computers 10+ hours a day, is great! As soon as I got it 3+ years ago my red-eye, eye-discomfort, dry-eye and strained-eye
89.
by esMazer 13y ago
wondering exactly the same thing!
90.
by esMazer 13y ago
this would be great!

More ›