ergo14

78 ms·

1. 841.▲
   by ergo14 16y ago

   Indeed, links is awesome at showing real time charts, I agree. I'm also sure mozilla is ashamed of their new MDN site, and FB for its facebook chat. I need clarify, i want to use it for features, not "bling".
2. 842.▲
   by ergo14 16y ago

   I'm perfectly fine with idea of losing 5 users out of 100 - because 95% of my target base will use modern browser(or less because someone that doesn't use a decent browser will very likely be unable to benefit from my site in first place -
3. 843.▲
   by ergo14 16y ago

   Well, I can only say that I don't plan to put anything resource intensive to the layout, i'd risk to say that the website should work fast for you, not sure how well it would look on 2.x, but keep in mind that YT uses flash that is main res
4. 844.▲
   by ergo14 16y ago

   Indeed, but i would find a common denominator - I would go with features firefox 3.x, webkit, opera + ie9 support. This seems like sane compromise to me.
5. 845.▲
   What's your opinion on websites that "force" users to use modern browsers?

   3 points by ergo14 16y ago|14 comments