Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
eqvinox
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
28 ms
·
481.
▲
by
eqvinox
7mo ago
No they didn't, they built an alternative to the Internet. It can't replace BGP on the existing internet.
482.
▲
by
eqvinox
7mo ago
I knew the masks were expensive, but not that they were that expensive. Of course it's all a question of total quantity you use that mask for, but still...
483.
▲
by
eqvinox
7mo ago
Can I ask how bad it is with lower speed I/O? Less than 20Mbaud, so RS232, RS485, CAN, USB PD/Type-C, 10base-T, ...? The transceivers are rarely integrated, do they need different processes or do they just prefer flexible I/
484.
▲
by
eqvinox
7mo ago
> The masks alone are single digit millions, Ah, another reason why hardware erratas get fixed so rarely (I assume - along with retesting of course).
485.
▲
by
eqvinox
7mo ago
I mean, yeah, sure, I can see that for open source. And GPL'd code is not open source, it's free software. The license implies the code cannot find its way into non-GPL codebases, and you can't profit*1 from the code. (But yo
486.
▲
by
eqvinox
8mo ago
Sorry, I don't have further data on this. It's going to be a subjective judgement either way.
487.
▲
by
eqvinox
8mo ago
Immediate results without miscounts and at far lower cost. Given some confidence into the system, you'd only audit the paper ballots stochastically for a randomly chosen, say, 5% of election districts each time. [Whether that's wo
488.
▲
by
eqvinox
8mo ago
sigh This is why you do parallel paper/electronic voting. Fill it out electronically, it prints a receipt (maybe including a QR code), you mail the receipt (along with the 'classic' absentee voting stuff, i.e. double envel
489.
▲
by
eqvinox
8mo ago
The comparison target for PHP is IMHO a good Python web framework, e.g. Django being the most popular one. I still don't understand how JavaScript is ever considered viable, TypeScript makes it workable I guess…
490.
▲
by
eqvinox
8mo ago
Well, by this logic there have been 0 successful OSes made with LLMs so far...
491.
▲
by
eqvinox
8mo ago
Yeah but this is research, if they're to come up somewhere, where else would it be?
492.
▲
by
eqvinox
8mo ago
Are they joined by Knights Templar?
493.
▲
by
eqvinox
8mo ago
You can probably do phased arrays. (It might already be a phased array.)
494.
▲
by
eqvinox
8mo ago
It really doesn't matter until one tries to enforce an AGPL provision. If you do, that's where as you say will be arguments whether one added something substantial enough; basically the AGPL terms can really only be enforced on th
495.
▲
by
eqvinox
8mo ago
Fefe doesn't capitalise the 2nd F in his name btw.
496.
▲
by
eqvinox
8mo ago
https://blog.recurity-labs.com/2026-03-02/Farewell_Felix
497.
▲
FX (of Phenoelit) has passed away
(defcon.social)
3 points
by
eqvinox
8mo ago
|
2 comments
498.
▲
by
eqvinox
8mo ago
He had suffered from an aneurysm almost 10 years ago: https://blog.recurity-labs.com/archives/2017/01/25/get_well_... He was a legend in German circles.
499.
▲
by
eqvinox
8mo ago
I'm not American, at least it's not "my" ruling class
500.
▲
by
eqvinox
8mo ago
People are very creative in defeating those mechanisms. It's mostly a question of time. Also doesn't help if there's some side channel or software leak. The only "truly" 'safe-ish' thing is active batter
501.
▲
by
eqvinox
8mo ago
Exactly this. Burning in a shared secret works; alternatively you could do something with private keys burned into each device, signed with some PKI scheme whose public keys are known to the other entity. Notably both of these turn it into
502.
▲
by
eqvinox
8mo ago
It does with the root comment though, it's all just piss poor politics :-)
503.
▲
by
eqvinox
8mo ago
Doesn't even matter if it's a direct effect, the increase in oil prices is/will be enough.
504.
▲
by
eqvinox
8mo ago
You're forgetting that U.S. healthcare costs are also massively overblown compared to other western countries, due to the absence of proper collective bargaining. (And possibly even collusion between insurers and healthcare providers t
505.
▲
by
eqvinox
8mo ago
Not exactly surprising; unless you establish some type of shared secret between the TPM and CPU (e.g. by burning it into fuses in both devices, or through some signature scheme), the bus connecting the two will always be a problem…
506.
▲
by
eqvinox
8mo ago
Interesting aspect: if the ammo is all used up in Iran, it can't be sold or given to Ukraine. Tinfoil hat time?
507.
▲
by
eqvinox
8mo ago
I mean… just ask about something "naughty" and they'll fail? At the very least you'd need to use setups without safeguards to pass any Turing test… The Turing test could also be considered equivalent to "can humans
508.
▲
by
eqvinox
8mo ago
Probably more of a problem if combined with other exploitable issues in other devices. Like if your TV doesn't properly check signatures on its firmware upgrades…
509.
▲
by
eqvinox
8mo ago
802.11 is kinda poorly designed in this regard, but they do isolate to some degree. I need to read the paper, some claims here have a very strong "misunderstood or wrong or specific vendor problem" smell.
510.
▲
by
eqvinox
8mo ago
What exactly a VLAN is (or rather, properly: broadcast domain) gets kinda fuzzy in enterprise controller based wifi setups… and client isolation isn't really different from what some switches sell as "Private VLAN" (but termi
More ›