Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
epolanski
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
61.
▲
by
epolanski
27d ago
I find both arguments asinine: why would socials for adults or outsourcing thinking by adults be good?
62.
▲
by
epolanski
27d ago
Somebody tell the Chinese companies to stop dumping AI, so US labs can keep burning pension funds money wrapped in VC checks fine dumping AI at a huge loss. In any case I find the dumping argument stupid: they are giving both the model weig
63.
▲
by
epolanski
27d ago
I don't understand how do you think that would work and who would pay the bill.
64.
▲
by
epolanski
27d ago
What's next? Full blown communism? In any case, bad idea if other retaliate with their exports. Also, US cannot really use the oil it produces, because it can refine very little of it. Any export ban would require massive investments.
65.
▲
by
epolanski
27d ago
You're missing a key part: energy prices in US go up too. It doesn't matter if US and its colonies are net producers.
66.
▲
by
epolanski
27d ago
Oil is sold globally. It doesn't matter if in Texas wells are producing it at a penny for barrel, if the global prices are high that oil is going to be sold to Philippinos, Japanese, Italians or South Africans. So, at the same time, it
67.
▲
by
epolanski
27d ago
> and her taking in of Syrian immigrants also didn't end well. Syrian refugees . They were escaping a civil war, they weren't looking for a job. Most Germans supported taking the refugees as of 2015, less opposed it. As for nu
68.
▲
by
epolanski
27d ago
> Honestly, I'm coming round to the notion that Angela Merkel was literally wrong on everything she ever touched. In a world where the Russo-Ukrainian conflict doesn't happen she was fine. In a world where it does, suddenly an
69.
▲
by
epolanski
27d ago
As an European, trust me, Trump has little to do with it. We've been doing fine championing our nationalism instead of creating a strong internal market. Because Hungarians decide in Hungary and Spaniards in Spain doing business across
70.
▲
by
epolanski
27d ago
Which people? Because the responsibility lies in the founding fathers thinking that electing kings with little to no checks was a good idea.
71.
▲
by
epolanski
27d ago
> Shopify has been using LLMs to build software since 2021 Odd banter. So did anybody using GitHub copilot which was in technical preview back then?
72.
▲
by
epolanski
29d ago
Wait till you find out AI writes even better css without the tailwind crap.
73.
▲
by
epolanski
29d ago
Judging the quality of this blogpost/presentation, AI is centuries away from being able to replace humans.
74.
▲
by
epolanski
29d ago
Irrelevant in 2026, you can share your results with a click.
75.
▲
by
epolanski
29d ago
You're naive if you're thinking the scumbags running the US companies aren't using your data. In any case old rules apply: if privacy is a concern don't share the data. I share all my work-related code because it's
76.
▲
by
epolanski
29d ago
I've occasionally got chinese characters in anthropic/openai's responses too, locally on codex/claude. Hasn't happened in a while, last time was when I was testing fable 5 in june.
77.
▲
by
epolanski
29d ago
What do you mean? In any case mathematics is humanity's oldest open source project going on for millenia, it never belonged to a single country, institution or class.
78.
▲
by
epolanski
1mo ago
If model X fits your need, you don't need to upgrade. I have released applications on Gemini 3.5 flash that make real money and I don't see any particular reason to upgrade.
79.
▲
by
epolanski
1mo ago
It feels cheap plastic, true, but it's also light and resists a lot of damage. Mine v10 has 6 years, has seen some important falls, but bears no damage of any of those. I wouldn't recommend it because price/quality Dyson va
80.
▲
by
epolanski
1mo ago
This is not a nit. This is a real problem in the technology. It assumes the average and plausible answer token by token. And this tendency shows in every single field it's applied to. At the end of the day I want *correct* answers, to
81.
▲
by
epolanski
1mo ago
Why would you think we aren't? There's an endless number of scientific problems out there in any field, and nobody able to dedicate themselves to it. I've been in research (you con check my name on Google Scholar for my relea
82.
▲
by
epolanski
1mo ago
I think this whole distillation argument is between fully overblown and bogus. In any case, highly misunderstood.
83.
▲
by
epolanski
1mo ago
Interesting, I liked to experiment with a second model "simplifying" and summarizing the previous messages and continue. Needless to say, it improved output on following messages by whatever metric I cared for. Not sure why would
84.
▲
by
epolanski
1mo ago
While I also agree that Opus 4.6, in some ways, was the last model that truly felt an assistant, all the following ones seem to have inverted the role, even a blind person can see that throwing difficult problems, and complex bugs at this m
85.
▲
by
epolanski
1mo ago
Just the other way I was thinking that if I asked "What does Lamborghini do?" the only correct way to answer is a single sentence "Which Lamborghini are you referring to?". But LLMs will fail at this question: they will
86.
▲
by
epolanski
1mo ago
> As someone working in science, this belief confuses me. How (by what means) do you think Fable 5.1 will be able to make further progress in scientific domains? The same way it did in the previous versions: brute force. I don't bel
87.
▲
by
epolanski
1mo ago
> OpenAI and Anthropic have totally dropped the ball on getting their respective desktop apps in front of the enterprise business user cleanly Data, contracts, procurement are the blockers for enterprise, not features. Big companies will
88.
▲
by
epolanski
1mo ago
You highly underestimate how both Claude and OpenAI have peanuts of the enterprise marketshare compared to Copilot and Gemini. I see it first had across all my non-tech friends: their companies already used Teams/Sharepoint or Google S
89.
▲
by
epolanski
1mo ago
+1, I see it very clearly at my SO work. Half of her organization has just a calendar filled with meetings. And without meeting the organization would find that you only really need a third of the people, and you would even likely increase
90.
▲
by
epolanski
1mo ago
No, that's your opinion not backed by any science. As I posted you a comprehensive review of carnivore diet literature there's no evidence of any long term benefit, in fact, there's evidence of the contrary. You really sound
More ›