Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ephemeralgomi
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
by
ephemeralgomi
12y ago
Says right in the article that you can recharge it with ice instead of electricity.
32.
▲
by
ephemeralgomi
12y ago
From the article: "The worst of the harbingers? Repeat customers, those with a tendency to purchase a product like Diet Crystal Pepsi not just once, but over and over again. These customers really, really like the products that end up
33.
▲
by
ephemeralgomi
12y ago
Partially because McDonalds/PHP lets you eat/deploy by cramming/uploading the food/file directly into your mouth/server. No utensils/tools required.
34.
▲
by
ephemeralgomi
12y ago
If it's Showdown (which, given your description, it must be) then I love you. /dex was incredibly helpful when wending my way through Battle Maison.
35.
▲
by
ephemeralgomi
12y ago
Same here (although my living dex has since been deposited in Bank). I was super psyched to take this quiz and then was immediately disappointed by the first question. Too bad, coulda been funny.
36.
▲
by
ephemeralgomi
12y ago
I get a _lot_ of mileage out of being able to chain promises like that. If I really need to resolve a promise to a promise, I can resolve to an object wrapping the promise and then unwrap it on the receiving side.
37.
▲
by
ephemeralgomi
12y ago
async.js has 'waterfall' and 'parallel', both of which take an array of functions, and it's (imo) much clearer to declare them as anonymous functions inline than make named functions and then pass an array of names
38.
▲
by
ephemeralgomi
12y ago
This is awful. Shell commands are not guaranteed to be idempotent, people! These should all be of the form exec($_POST, not exec($_GET.
39.
▲
by
ephemeralgomi
12y ago
No, you're totally right here. I think matdes skimmed over the critical "without having everyone in on it" part of your post.
40.
▲
by
ephemeralgomi
12y ago
Yup.
41.
▲
by
ephemeralgomi
12y ago
I know you're trolling, but some people might not, so I thought it might be helpful to point out that they are actually discovering and fixing vulnerabilities. For example, CVE-2010-5298: http://www.tedunangst.com/flak
42.
▲
by
ephemeralgomi
12y ago
"the investigator did find evidence of mistakes and errors of judgment."
43.
▲
by
ephemeralgomi
12y ago
Link to where the XKCD comic was debunked or shown obsolete? Most of the responses I've seen to it were of the form "well, yeah, but you're not gonna remember a hundred different passphrases, it's much better to use a p
44.
▲
by
ephemeralgomi
12y ago
I mean this in the nicest way: I'd just like to point out that before Kickstarter, pretty much your only option would have been to scrounge up the money yourselves, invest it along with your sweat, blood, tears, and time into making th
45.
▲
by
ephemeralgomi
12y ago
Heartbleed doesn't give you access to storage - it gives you access to the raw heap of the process that's linked to OpenSSL. Passwords are typically transmitted unhashed, albeit encrypted by TLS, and the application decrypts the
46.
▲
by
ephemeralgomi
12y ago
I do now! Thanks for makin me feel better =)
47.
▲
by
ephemeralgomi
12y ago
I'm kind of sad that this is a throwaway account because you're posting good responses, that are technically competent and are actually specific to the bug discussed in the article, to people who are either less informed or are t
48.
▲
by
ephemeralgomi
12y ago
These aren't "tricks" or "abuse". They're design patterns.
49.
▲
by
ephemeralgomi
13y ago
The ideal resolution for Tesla is for the guy to drop the suit. This is what they're trying to accomplish by laying their cards on the table. IANAL either, but I'm not sure what risk you're talking about - do you suspect th
50.
▲
by
ephemeralgomi
13y ago
My main objection to it is that since the OP is almost certainly going to accept their own answer before other people can post, there may be other, better answers that arrive late and don't get as much attention.
51.
▲
by
ephemeralgomi
13y ago
This was exactly my thought, too. Upon investigating Project Spark, it seems like something more akin to a pumped-up LittleBigPlanet than an actual game development framework. I'm sure folks will have fun playing around with it, but
52.
▲
by
ephemeralgomi
13y ago
> Otherwise this "stand up your own email/cloud" trend would have started last summer. It did! Understandably, since it's not absolutely-zero-effort, there hasn't been 100% uptake, but Alex Payne started up a pr
53.
▲
by
ephemeralgomi
13y ago
> painfulness to read (not debug with an IDE, which is easy, but to actually read Java code) This is incredibly important and I never see any Java advocate addressing it. I _do_ see tons of people pointing out how easy it is to automate
54.
▲
by
ephemeralgomi
13y ago
They didn't punish anyone yet.
55.
▲
by
ephemeralgomi
13y ago
If anything, "I would like to personally apologize to Julie" would mean that defunkt personally wronged her, not the company. Maybe he's just sorry because she's obviously hurt and things didn't work out for the bes
56.
▲
by
ephemeralgomi
13y ago
> Pretty much a full admission that everything that Julie said is true. It reads more like an admission that at least some of what Julie said is not immediately known to be untrue and that they have to check it out. Hence the, y'kn
57.
▲
by
ephemeralgomi
13y ago
No, you're absolutely wrong.
58.
▲
by
ephemeralgomi
13y ago
Promises are great for replacing callbacks in the sense of "Here is a function I want you to call once and only once". You can't convert the callback parameter of http.Server.listen() to a promise. I don't really get th
59.
▲
by
ephemeralgomi
13y ago
There is always room for misinterpretation. You will never be able to defend yourself 100% against people with poor reading comprehension.
60.
▲
by
ephemeralgomi
13y ago
For future reference, the bad API/app design is worse.
More ›