eonil

19 ms·

181.
by eonil 13y ago
OK I see your point. My original intention was using HTML as a GUI toolkit layer, and I realized that was wrong idea with PNaCL. It's exactly opposite concept. It's my mistake. I'm sorry for that. Wow. now I see PNaCL is real
182.
by eonil 13y ago
Building a factory in America doesn't mean the jobs also will be there.
183.
by eonil 13y ago
Maybe here's a miscommunication. I meant no price, no need to trade my copyright , and maybe you're meaning freedom to access source code - strict GPL meaning. Also I haven't argue payment itself is bad. Go back and read c
184.
by eonil 13y ago
I really wanna know how those IDEs offer debugging.
185.
by eonil 13y ago
I think it's just a sarcasm.
186.
by eonil 13y ago
GPL requires you to PAY your freedom to choose license for the freedom to access source code. So it's trade of freedoms, not free.
187.
by eonil 13y ago
If I want to write a portable C++ GUI app, this codebase would be a good free option to fork. Anyway running in Chrome product sandbox is nothing attractive. For the web, I would bet on Emscripten + asm.js which is a lot more portable.
188.
by eonil 13y ago
This is real big news! This blows out the concern for long term product availability, and will make more conservative people to adapt the product.
189.
by eonil 13y ago
The author should mention Smalltalk to talk about pure OOP . Not mentioning Smalltalk means the author didn't really researched the pure OOP . The author just tasted some OO style languages. I really don't understand how can
190.
by eonil 13y ago
(1) The author knew social data is a graph topology . (2) Also knew there's no true production level graph database solution in the market.(I doubt this but anyway, the author did) (3) And tried to store it into many ISOLATED trees -
191.
by eonil 13y ago
At first, I thought Generic is not that much desired. But after having some time with Go, I think Go really need generics. The problem is Go lacks immutable data structure. I believe everybody know why immutable data structure is required.
192.
by eonil 13y ago
I am not sure that we're talking on same context… but anyway. I invested much time on C# 1.0 to 3.0 for XNA, and MS never give a shit on XNA for years and finally fucked me up. XNA doesn't exist anymore. Happy time with MS was the
193.
by eonil 13y ago
I like to know whether this language support these stuffs. - C++ level of const correctness or a simple way to make immutable data structure. Or immutable view of full data structure. - Explicit symmetric coroutine with safe data sharing ma
194.
by eonil 13y ago
My mistake.
195.
by eonil 13y ago
This is the best logic I ever heard in this thread. Guido is working in Google, and Google doesn't support Python on Android. Python is just secondary scripting language even in Google, can't take a strategic support. Their primar
196.
by eonil 13y ago
Javascript is, 1. Dynamically strongly typed, but typing is limited to primitive types. 2. So actually it's untyped for objects which is really needs type information. 3. As it lacks class/interface concept at all, type (an)nota
197.
by eonil 13y ago
At least, what I mean was an ability to offer those type informations to automated tools - auto-completion system. How actually Python type doesn't matter. Python lacks the ability by not forcing type (an)notation. This is fundamentall
198.
by eonil 13y ago
Ruby is strongly typed. I am not sure that's static or dynamic, but regardless of how it is implemented, Ruby lacks ability to offer type information to code-writing level toolsets because it doesn't force retaining of type inform
199.
by eonil 13y ago
I think you originally intended explicit type notation . I recently discovered actual type doesn't matter that much, and the point is having an interface/protocol which enable compiler validation and tooling support. I learned
200.
by eonil 13y ago
And .NET framework tend to overuse subclassing/overriding pattern where delegation is more appropriate. That frequently leads users also overuse subclassing/overriding.
201.
by eonil 13y ago
I like to add some more. That's correct that the type system is the crucial attribute as a platform language. But that's not the only reason. It's also for correctness, safety, productivity and manageability. That's beca
202.
by eonil 13y ago
the point is adding type system, not compiling it.
203.
by eonil 13y ago
Ah I see. This is the old issue. Why wrapper layers have to be later than its source…
204.
by eonil 13y ago
Do you mean you want something like Mono's Xamarin in Python?
205.
by eonil 13y ago
What's wrong with embedding python interpreter as a C library?
206.
by eonil 13y ago
Really wanna know what GPU is equipped to cover 4K graphics.
207.
by eonil 13y ago
Well, current DCC tools market is really sucks by Autodesk monopoly. I wish this to be a real competitive solution so the market to get real innovations.
208.
by eonil 13y ago
I still see the cuchar fail on Clang source 3.3, but maybe different on trunk.
209.
by eonil 13y ago
Another cross-platform UI toolkit. Which using CSS.
210.
by eonil 13y ago
What I don't agree was this phrase. *much more common combination* Why? no clue, no reason. But Clang with libc++? There're reasons. The primary Clang user groups are Apple and FreeBSD communities. a.k.a. anti-GCC groups.

More ›