Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
enraged_camel
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
61.
▲
by
enraged_camel
25d ago
Great, thanks for sharing.
62.
▲
by
enraged_camel
25d ago
>> Fable easily trips its safe guards. Maybe it depends on the type of work you do, because for me it almost never happens. >> You can be 95% complete with the plan for it to trip and then lose it all. That's... not what ha
63.
▲
by
enraged_camel
25d ago
Interesting that they seem to have gone all-in on science, and life sciences in particular. Improvements to coding performance seem marginal, although cost savings are very welcome. Curious to see how Astra does.
64.
▲
by
enraged_camel
25d ago
Fable is significantly better at helping me think through (and untangle) business logic problems as well. I actually rarely use it for implementation because Opus 5 is good enough for my use cases. YMMV.
65.
▲
by
enraged_camel
26d ago
The reason LLMs use the same cadence and cliches is that their RLHF does not emphasize writing well, the way it emphasizes, say, coding. And the reason for that should be pretty obvious: coding is where the big money is at. So the author ma
66.
▲
by
enraged_camel
26d ago
Meta comment: I've been wondering why AI-generated websites/artifacts/reports always have the same "look". It reminds me of Bootstrap (CSS Framework) days when every startup website looked the same. Are they followi
67.
▲
by
enraged_camel
26d ago
>> How do I, as a founder, know that I am falling into an anti pattern? The easiest way is to have outside advisors who can and are willingto adversarially challenge the assumptions you're making. If you don't have those, go
68.
▲
by
enraged_camel
26d ago
FWIW I think it is miscategorized. "Build it and they will come" is a different type of problem: it commonly refers to building something thinking that its value and usefulness are self-evident that it will sell itself, and theref
69.
▲
by
enraged_camel
1mo ago
Yeah. I like the way Claude Design handles this: if you come back to a chat after the cache expires, the chat UI shows a message like "start a new chat to save 300k tokens" or whatever. It's pretty nice if you're working
70.
▲
by
enraged_camel
1mo ago
It's also amusing that you won't ever hear conservatives like Thomas making the same argument when it comes to, say, the 2nd amendment.
71.
▲
Beyond China's humanoid robots, a quieter machine revolution is unfolding
(bbc.com)
7 points
by
enraged_camel
1mo ago
|
0 comments
72.
▲
by
enraged_camel
1mo ago
Maybe it's just me but it blows my mind that this tiny thing cost $20k. I wish building stuff in the West wasn't so expensive.
73.
▲
by
enraged_camel
1mo ago
FWIW: The highest paid devs I know excel at 2, and aren't even that good at 1.
74.
▲
by
enraged_camel
1mo ago
>> A comment is just a summary of the code in an abstraction that's easier to follow. I disagree. The code already tells you what it does. A summary has low value. Comments should be for explaining the why : the reason the funct
75.
▲
by
enraged_camel
1mo ago
>> but in my case, it always contain issues caught only when it's reviewed again Yes but those issues will be much less severe with Fable-written plans than those written by lesser models. I know this because my workflows at both
76.
▲
by
enraged_camel
1mo ago
>> GLM 5.2 is worth focusing on. It came out the same week as Fable and is roughly 1/9th the cost (and ~1/5th the cost of Opus 5). Is GLM 1/9th the quality of Fable? Perhaps, for certain classes of tasks. But for most r
77.
▲
by
enraged_camel
1mo ago
It is wild to read stuff like this when it is OpenAI that is being blamed for rug-pulling users and secretly reducing limits. It's such a big mess that Codex's product lead has been frantically posting updates on Twitter about it.
78.
▲
by
enraged_camel
1mo ago
To me laziness has nothing to do with it. I'd rather focus on my limited time on things that actually matter, e.g. the design of an important product feature or the root cause of a bug and the proper fix. I delegate everything else to
79.
▲
by
enraged_camel
1mo ago
Okay but that's not the type of tax we're talking about here. Tariffs are much more like a sales tax . And sales taxes are regressive: they take a larger percentage of income from low-income earners than from high-income earners
80.
▲
by
enraged_camel
1mo ago
This should be the top post. The original tweet went viral because people loooove bashing Anthropic. It gets engagement (as shown here).
81.
▲
by
enraged_camel
1mo ago
>> Add that to the list of things I thought I'd never hear a conservative say. Rayiner is a bad-faith troll who thinks he is being clever by doing the whole “oh, I thought you wanted to raise taxes, liberal??” thing. He does not
82.
▲
by
enraged_camel
1mo ago
>> What are we waiting for. For Europe to become fully self-sufficient when it comes to defense, for one thing.
83.
▲
by
enraged_camel
1mo ago
Glad you think so.
84.
▲
by
enraged_camel
1mo ago
You didn't really address my point. You just... stated your own.
85.
▲
by
enraged_camel
1mo ago
>> I think the main difference I feel between Claude and Codex is that Claude tries to go above and beyond what is asked and guess what you might want and then directly do it, while Codex is more like a companion that does what you te
86.
▲
by
enraged_camel
1mo ago
>> In a world where things such as GLM-5.3, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813, and Kimi-K3 exists, this is a bit laughable. Is it, though? We don't know what Mythos is really capable of, beyond what Anthropic has told us, and some second-ha
87.
▲
by
enraged_camel
1mo ago
This does not match my experience. I use long-running orchestrator sessions. Each orchestrator is in charge of planning, writing kick-off prompts for implementers, answering questions from those implementers, doing code reviews and providin
88.
▲
by
enraged_camel
1mo ago
Very strong anti-LGBTQ+ sentiment as well.
89.
▲
by
enraged_camel
1mo ago
Also, a lot of these "rare books" are stuff like TV programming magazines from October 1994.
90.
▲
by
enraged_camel
1mo ago
>> They may not have solved the problem, but at least they are doing something about it. In my opinion, that's better than doing nothing at all. The alternative is not "doing nothing at all." It's spending the mone
More ›