enedil

18 ms·

211.
by enedil 8y ago
There are so many places on the world where $2000 a month is more than most people get. Of course they didn't pay that much. I would probably consider it seriously given that currently I get about $800 and that is still considered aver
212.
by enedil 8y ago
Getting enterprise certificate is not easy and requires manual approval from Apple for registered company. I can imagine that getting another one can be hard, if ever possible.
213.
by enedil 8y ago
That's exactly what I did several months ago. My mental health improved too. I have only a handful pages I follow and no people.
214.
by enedil 8y ago
Well, yes. I had credit card since I was 16 and I believe 13 was the lower limit (but that's not in US).
215.
by enedil 8y ago
But your comment it missing the point. Parent commenter said it needs to start recording audio and video earlier, and a combination of other circumstances cause the device to send the data. Nobody argues this is acceptable.
216.
by enedil 8y ago
But that's not only about Unicode. You can't start your filename with digit or a dash.
217.
by enedil 8y ago
That's assuming you didn't read OC reply to the same comment above.
218.
by enedil 8y ago
Have you been to Europe?
219.
by enedil 8y ago
I can read and write Chinese only partially, but that's not needed here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/bd61em3tieo8ry0/Screenshot_2019011...
220.
by enedil 8y ago
Oh really? And do you have built-in microblogging platform? Do you have OCR with English-Chinese and Chinese-English translation? Do you have mobile payments? Do you have discover people feature (by location)? Can you identify movies by rec
221.
by enedil 8y ago
Afaik iMessage isn't banned.
222.
by enedil 8y ago
so what is a "Mac app"?
223.
by enedil 8y ago
You say "ML" tasks. Do you mean StandardML or Ocaml?
224.
by enedil 8y ago
Omg, you're not thinking he's done all this by hand, right? People here can code such simple things. And you don't need no specific symbols, just arrays of ints (or any suitable type).
225.
by enedil 8y ago
So the malicious site can run risk assessment first and then if it thinks nobody's looking, send different code for hashing to this particular user.
226.
by enedil 8y ago
It's not modern use of racism. If you think so, all you do is you're praising ignorance.
227.
by enedil 8y ago
Oh really? And what if you aren't storing the data? You just want to find such n, that f(n) >= m and f(n+1) < m. Now perhaps it might become an issue.
228.
by enedil 8y ago
It's not less then even, it's exactly e.
229.
by enedil 8y ago
Well, then he's dumb, because he should at least acknowledge that the conviction date is from before 1996, so who knows what happened?
230.
by enedil 8y ago
Is that really worse for people who were omitted by this legislature that this legislature passed? Because I can't see any change.
231.
by enedil 8y ago
If a hypothesis is widely expected-to-be-true, then there needs to be a good evidence towards it, which in turn means that it stood unresolved for a long time. That's why probably most of them are still unsolved.
232.
by enedil 8y ago
So in this case you're sure that this is the right abstraction. Here's one that I find equally well fitted: you basically want a stable sort on the list with key function f(x) = 1 - (x % 2) This is also a standard problem. Do you
233.
by enedil 8y ago
Oh, come on, the solution is trivial.
234.
by enedil 8y ago
It was posted before [1] and thus I know the paper isn't from 2018. Should it be added to title? [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14879488
235.
by enedil 8y ago
Well, better modify $PATH than changing some system directories.
236.
by enedil 8y ago
If you have Mac or Linux, you probably already have Ruby.
237.
by enedil 8y ago
Don't you have Firefox?
238.
by enedil 8y ago
Notice that mathematicians don't take real numbers for granted too - we need to assume their existence first. Looking at this, complex numbers stop being that arbitrary, just another extension of reals. Also, it's nitpicking, but
239.
by enedil 8y ago
Yes, you can. Order is just a relation, i.e. a set that contains pairs of elements. So for example, let X be the relation <. X is a subset of NxN, the cartesian product of N. We say that n<m if the pair (n,m) is in X. Moreover, we say
240.
by enedil 8y ago
Answer to your question number 3 is: well, if I have just one apple, with label 3.1415926535 then obviously it will fit. Notice that no two apples have the same labels.

More ›