endisneigh

10 ms·

91.
by endisneigh 2y ago
Orders of magnitude more energy necessary though.
92.
by endisneigh 2y ago
It would be interesting to model the real Wikipedia in a fashion where there are “critical events” and connections to nodes, which are events with the vertices being the causes, logically specified. Then, you could have some thing where you
93.
by endisneigh 3y ago
Source?
94.
by endisneigh 3y ago
I’m curious how you produce this? How could I make this for my house or neighborhood? Things like matterport seem too proprietary. This particular one seems to be a far higher quality as well. I’m curious what rig they used.
95.
by endisneigh 3y ago
Good to continue to see a permissive license here.
96.
by endisneigh 3y ago
Per the article you’re paid to make new content. Even if that were not true, releasing the rights for so little is dumb.
97.
by endisneigh 3y ago
Depending on the content that’s a terrible deal. Low ball is it takes an hour to produce a single minute of video. You’re being paid 3 bucks an hour. If it’s animation it could take a day to animate a single minute, in which case you’re bei
98.
by endisneigh 3y ago
If it’s an embedded app like an iOS or android app it’s the right choices.
99.
by endisneigh 3y ago
It would be interesting to see a database built from the ground up for being trivial to maintain. I use managed databases, but is there really that much to do for maintaining a database? The host requires some level of maintenance - changin
100.
by endisneigh 3y ago
Other than games, anyone have good examples of real time multi user apps? Even with things like docs and sheets, though the capability is there, I find myself rarely editing in real time with others.
101.
by endisneigh 3y ago
It’s not inherently a bad idea, though. I do agree it would likely be poorly implemented.
102.
by endisneigh 3y ago
SQLite is one of those things that I hear people on hear advocating a lot but have never personally encountered anyone using other than embedded iOS/Android work. I’m talking businesses with 8 or 9 digit revenue, not side projects with
103.
by endisneigh 3y ago
I don’t understand why that is a bad thing. Perhaps a closed source fork will end up being superior through incentives only available through closing the source. Humanity still can use an open source fork. More options must be superior, no?
104.
by endisneigh 3y ago
I really don’t understand you. Even if there was a closed source fork, users would still be free to use the open source one. There is no restriction or diminishing of options. In fact, now there are even more options and thus more freedom.
105.
by endisneigh 3y ago
With all due respect I do not think that makes any sense. You’re creating this metaphor with the government, but this isn’t the government. In the end freedom is a spectrum and you are free to do more with MIT than LGPL. Even if someone for
106.
by endisneigh 3y ago
I did not say it would be an open source license. My point is simply that Redict takes something more permissive and makes it restrictive, which is true.
107.
by endisneigh 3y ago
The OSI doesn’t represent everyone. It’s simply a fact that MIT for instance allows things like Redict and this discussion to take place, as well as other things. It is maximally permissive.
108.
by endisneigh 3y ago
I disagree - Redict is only possible because of the permissive license to begin with. A hypothetical license that said no forks allowed wouldn’t allow Redict, for instance.
109.
by endisneigh 3y ago
Yes, but Redis was even less restrictive to begin with.
110.
by endisneigh 3y ago
Copyleft is a string. The default would be complete permissiveness. If someone gave you something the correct presumption would be that you can do as you like with it, unless - and what follows are strings, like copy left. It isn’t inhe
111.
by endisneigh 3y ago
Isn’t Linux GPL? What’s the relevance? Edit: Linux was always GPL, Redis was not, so I don’t see the relevance.
112.
by endisneigh 3y ago
I read the post and it’s not clear why it’s not MIT licensed. Why not allow attempts to “create proprietary distributions?” That’s what open source would allow, no? I honestly do not see this as being different than Redis. Do BSD or MIT and
113.
by endisneigh 3y ago
A neat trick would be solar panels mounted on tall trees with waterproof phones attached. Set up a daemon and spread them worldwide and you have something neat. Maybe you could have some geographic sharding going on for the right applicatio
114.
by endisneigh 3y ago
I believe this to be the case too, but what conclusion can be made? It’s like saying OpenAI researchers make more than university AI researchers. OK, but the rates of employment and ability to attain such positions are different. One should
115.
by endisneigh 3y ago
This is a poorly done study. Doesn’t even control for profession. Take union electricians vs. fast food workers. Union electricians will make much more, like the article it saying. So what? What’s the conclusion here as it relates to unions
116.
by endisneigh 3y ago
They’ll get off their phones just after the adults.
117.
by endisneigh 3y ago
Not quite - if you do care, you can fork. I wouldn’t host as a third party service so it wouldn’t affect my projects either way.
118.
by endisneigh 3y ago
Is there a mug that will track water/liquid consumption?
119.
by endisneigh 3y ago
What you meant was understood and my point stands
120.
by endisneigh 3y ago
lol. If it helps you cope, imagine the company died, another company forked it with a new license. Same thing, same result. We are literally discussing this in a thread where a prominent maintainer died. Nothing is forever. There is no way

More ›