Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
emilfihlman
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
91.
▲
by
emilfihlman
3y ago
If I tap almost anything it will select that text and bring up a search bar. You should disable pointer events / text selection etc. I'm on Android (Samsung Galaxy S23+)
92.
▲
by
emilfihlman
3y ago
You are overestimating. Even if there was a working phone network and phones when we were hunter gatherers, this wouldn't allow us to grow cities. All inventions work off each other, but if we count them without prerequisites: Agricult
93.
▲
by
emilfihlman
3y ago
As a side note regarding bottle caps, the new EU bottle cap regulation that requires soda bottle and milk carton etc caps to be captive is absolutely idiotic, and just causes more problems.
94.
▲
by
emilfihlman
3y ago
>Malfunctioning No, it's behaving exactly how the training data and training procedures instructed it to behave, ie what Google's employees instructed it to do. It's not malfunctioning because you made it like this purpose
95.
▲
by
emilfihlman
3y ago
This has literally nothing to do with rule of law. Rule of law simply means that the laws of the land are respected and enforced (no matter what law it is). Ie codified rules are followed. This has nothing to do with how the rules are writt
96.
▲
by
emilfihlman
3y ago
That's absolutely dystopian.
97.
▲
by
emilfihlman
3y ago
Exactly
98.
▲
by
emilfihlman
3y ago
No? The first one asked for them, the second one didn't. The question is: If there are people 1 and 2, without any other information (like motive) available to us, who send spiders to a and b respectively without anything else being do
99.
▲
by
emilfihlman
3y ago
>If someone found a small, legal "act committed = no fine" way to victimize someone to the point of suicide, do you think it should be left unpunished ? Absolutely not. It should be punished. But if two people do the same thing
100.
▲
by
emilfihlman
3y ago
Damages shouldn't be subjective but based on the acts committed.
101.
▲
by
emilfihlman
3y ago
This is just not true. There absolutely is a good identity, and it's one provided by countries.
102.
▲
by
emilfihlman
3y ago
He has actual positioning built in with the ir transceiver.
103.
▲
by
emilfihlman
3y ago
This artificial limitation sounds very much like a purposeful limitation to gather licensing fees.
104.
▲
by
emilfihlman
3y ago
I recommend that you, for example, look into the very recent attack on the Russian Jabber service that was talked about here a lot a couple of weeks back. Companies, doesn't even have to be the CA themselves, are very easy to coerce
105.
▲
by
emilfihlman
3y ago
It's pretty funny to me when people defend PKI as something good and nice, especially while criticising EV. As it stands, PKI is EXACTLY good for spying, MITM etc attacks. I so wish that a) governments would become their own CAs, this
106.
▲
by
emilfihlman
3y ago
DST is good. It provides variety, forces us to be flexible and helps with the amount of sunlight.
107.
▲
by
emilfihlman
3y ago
Feedback on the site: The English on the it is very bad and unnatural, and unfortunately it's right at the start "You can no longer puzzle over where to get beautiful pictures for your brand. You can create optical illusion art wi
108.
▲
by
emilfihlman
3y ago
Direct your attention to the first line "If both of the addends have the same sign, the output must have that sign" This is absolutely not true, as already shown. x=5 y=10 z=x-y=-5, which has different sign from x. If we assume si
109.
▲
by
emilfihlman
3y ago
Direct your attention to the first line "If both of the addends have the same sign, the output must have that sign" This is absolutely not true, as already shown. x=5 y=10 z=x-y=-5, which has different sign from x. If we assume si
110.
▲
by
emilfihlman
3y ago
"If both of the addends have the same sign, the output must have that sign. However, for x−y that means if x and y have different signs the output must have the sign of x." This is trivially wrong, or mixing two different meanings
111.
▲
by
emilfihlman
3y ago
Yup, the tank turret rotation speed was indeed a classified document, but that was 2 years ago. Not that I don't wish that there wouldn't be more leaks, the info is juicy even if almost always pretty simple
112.
▲
by
emilfihlman
3y ago
These have, as have all the prior "leaks" this year, been available for years already. They are publicly available in many places, like public intelligence and various mega shares.
113.
▲
by
emilfihlman
3y ago
Indeed. Very often organisations tend towards buying solutions without appropriately gauging the situation. One easy example from IT is buying servers vs renting them, but fortunately it seems that IT people have found the, for some uncomfo
114.
▲
by
emilfihlman
3y ago
Absolutely this. IPv6 is when engineering doesn't face reality and operates on "we know better" standards, when they actually don't know better. I actually feel antagonist towards the designers for it.
115.
▲
by
emilfihlman
3y ago
Unfortunately not. Laws themselves are usually available for free online, but standards that laws and statues reference are in general not, and interpretation of law from cases is not in general directly available even if the cases themselv
116.
▲
by
emilfihlman
3y ago
This is superb, and Europe should follow suit.
117.
▲
by
emilfihlman
3y ago
Adding : to the front would make this pretty funny actually
118.
▲
by
emilfihlman
3y ago
This is just baseless and I don't even understand to what end. ESP32 isn't missing features vs say Arduino Uno and does not act oddly.
119.
▲
by
emilfihlman
4y ago
Regular files not having a non blocking mode is one of the biggest and gravest idiocies on linux land. And there's one even worse: even having the concept of uninterruptiple sleep (D).
120.
▲
by
emilfihlman
4y ago
This makes me hate Wikipedia deletionists all the more.
More ›