emil_sorensen

4 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by emil_sorensen 3y ago

   Yes, definitely!
2. 32.▲
   by emil_sorensen 3y ago

   Fair point. Although good writing for humans = good writing for LLMs and vice versa. So I'm hopeful this new excitement around AI for docs if anything will just encourage folks to put even more effort into writing great docs.
3. 33.▲
   by emil_sorensen 3y ago

   You nailed it. All of above sources are also super helpful for LLMs, but you have to be careful about how to ingest/parse them. For example for a Discourse Forum only including questions that have been marked "Resolved" by an
4. 34.▲
   by emil_sorensen 3y ago

   Exactly! It's very much garbage-in-garbage-out. One surprising (to me at least) benefit of hooking up an LLM to your docs is that it is actually a really useful way to find gaps in your docs. For example, when an LLM cannot answer a us
5. 35.▲
   by emil_sorensen 3y ago

   Author here. Happy to answer any questions!
6. 36.▲
   by emil_sorensen 3y ago

   Yep, agreed. As a founder of another YC company that's done a bunch of RAG on code and docs, the accuracy boost you get from having good docs makes a massive difference. You really do need a human interpreter to show you "how to u
7. 37.▲
   by emil_sorensen 3y ago

   This looks promising - but how is this different from tools like Aquarium Learning or Voxel51?
8. 38.▲
   Kapa.ai (YC S23) is hiring AI engineers with RAG focus (remote)(workatastartup.com)

   2 points by emil_sorensen 3y ago|0 comments