em-bee

28 ms·

601.
by em-bee 6mo ago
try co-sleeping, and also a comfortable baby-carrier that allows you to carry the baby around while keeping your hands free so you can work. the most difficult from babies not sleeping is that they are not supposed to sleep alone. see attac
602.
by em-bee 6mo ago
it won't take you job. it will take your work, and then make you babysit it. see the sister comment about dealing with slop code.
603.
by em-bee 6mo ago
and when you complain you have to argue with people who don't understand you. even here on hackernews. see my comment history of the past few days...
604.
by em-bee 6mo ago
they are both paid the same. clever and lazy is just less work ;-)
605.
by em-bee 6mo ago
can you please elaborate?
606.
by em-bee 6mo ago
technically you can't create a PR without forking the repo first. practically it also makes sense for a larger change to be developed in the open before it is ready to be merged upstream, so a friendly fork with the intent to explore s
607.
by em-bee 6mo ago
which would be the top country then? i can't think of any country in europe that offers even that much. perhaps scandinavia, but life is more expensive there too.
608.
by em-bee 6mo ago
it's very different. LLMs don't behave like people. they don't learn. i don't mind managing people, but i don't want to manage machines unless i can control them with the precise languages that the commandline and p
609.
by em-bee 6mo ago
the question is, where does that feeling come from? from your own time growing up, based on how your own father interacted with you? from your friends/peers? others? i can relate. when my kids were young i didn't know what to do w
610.
by em-bee 6mo ago
the rpm available for download (warp-terminal-0:v0.2026.04.27.15.32.stable_03-1) doesn't seem to work without login. after going through all the setup i got stuck at a prompt asking me to log in with no option to skip it.
611.
by em-bee 6mo ago
i just don't open the main page with the feed. i practically don't notice it's there. i have the messages view open, and i check notifications. i also don't follow anyone (except my contacts)
612.
by em-bee 6mo ago
The other fallacy is assuming that everyone else's experience with LLM-assisted writing is the same as yours. that's irrelevant. my choice can only be based on my experience. i am unable to verify your experience, because i am n
613.
by em-bee 6mo ago
> What does it take to "earn your trust"? multiple successful contributions of increasing complexity, among other things. >> LLM contributions are non-deterministic, which means they can never be trusted. > Provably
614.
by em-bee 6mo ago
anything unpredictable is inherently untrustworthy and requires extra effort to review. Lack of determinism is not a practical concern. it is to me. it's a knockout criteria. it is the only reason that keeps me from using LLMs for co
615.
by em-bee 6mo ago
only for versions 6.19.12 & 6.18.22. older versions (which are used in distributions) are not ready yet.
616.
by em-bee 6mo ago
it's in the definition of the word. you can not determine what the LLM will do. anything done with AI is a problem because it is essentially unpredictable. auto-complete is on the fence because you presumably are still able to pay atte
617.
by em-bee 6mo ago
working this way would drive me nuts
618.
by em-bee 6mo ago
i love it. just a moment of thought makes clear that LLMs are not capable to debug their own code because if they were they would be able to write better code. the LLM code doesn't even need to be clever.
619.
by em-bee 6mo ago
linter, sanitizer, the IDE itself, or even auto-completion unlike LLMs, those are deterministic. the IDE doesn't even change the code. auto-completion only has a problem if it is done with AI.
620.
by em-bee 6mo ago
Why would a contributor that uses AI assistance have fewer chances to be trusted? please read my explanation here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47964279
621.
by em-bee 6mo ago
you are saying that even if you understand the code, using an LLM saves you time writing it. fair enough[*]. the problem on my side still is that if you didn't write the code yourself, i have no evidence that you actually understood it
622.
by em-bee 6mo ago
why bother even contributing anything LLM generated if it won't get accepted?
623.
by em-bee 6mo ago
Blanket banning all of these seems like a bad idea to me. It actively gates people like myself from contributing in my projects i will reject any contribution that i do not understand. even if the contribution is handwritten by an expert
624.
by em-bee 6mo ago
if they had a good track record, the current submission that led to this article damaged it. i am reminded of this quote: it takes more cleverness to debug code than it takes to write it. if you write code as clever as you can, by definitio
625.
by em-bee 6mo ago
did you publish it? i'd use wxWidgets because it is the only cross platform toolkit i am aware of. if you can share your alternative then maybe this could help some people.
626.
by em-bee 6mo ago
to answer that question we need to first look at the alternatives. whee else could session management go? and then we can consider the benefits and drawbacks of each approach. if you are thinking of tmux then the problem here is that tmux i
627.
by em-bee 6mo ago
yes to both. (not as long as we keep to the topic and respond before the time to reply expires)
628.
by em-bee 6mo ago
it was valid but not the way XML is written or read by humans which is what we are discussing. how much of a pain it is to read is a matter of taste. i won't deny that. but XML can be made more readable without fail because it is a str
629.
by em-bee 6mo ago
right, see my response to the sibling comment.
630.
by em-bee 6mo ago
i agree. you may enjoy these recent comments about better terminals: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47812724 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47811986 https://news.ycombinator.com/

More ›