Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
elil17
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
91.
▲
by
elil17
3mo ago
Yes, they're a legitimate news organization. They are partially funded by the EU government.
92.
▲
by
elil17
3mo ago
For additional context, tensions are already high surrounding the US ambassador after he directly insulted multiple Belgian politicians and also attempted to interfere with local criminal judicial proceedings.
93.
▲
by
elil17
3mo ago
The people in the fabs aren't PhDs, they're extremely skilled technicians. They may have a similar number of hours of experience/training as a PhD, but that training is in troubleshooting automation systems, not doing researc
94.
▲
by
elil17
4mo ago
It is intended for manufacturing canned iced lattes and similar, as stated in the article.
95.
▲
by
elil17
4mo ago
>But perhaps this can be used in the instant coffee industry or something. As stated in the article, the whole point is for use in ready-to-drink coffee manufacturing.
96.
▲
by
elil17
4mo ago
Off topic, but some trains can even change gauge while in motion: https://www.reddit.com/r/trains/comments/kq6eds/this_is_how_...
97.
▲
by
elil17
4mo ago
> But watch as Germany soon loses AI Google results. That would be a boon for Germany in my book. If you wanted AI results you could go use an AI.
98.
▲
by
elil17
4mo ago
The problems with legs are sufficient that having two robots would be better than having one with legs. Here's why: - You can increase the payload a lot - You can increase the torso weight which means you can use cheaper, heavier compo
99.
▲
by
elil17
4mo ago
It is good to see someone finally working on one of these without the stupid legs (I think the legs are stupid because they give your robot the chance to fall over and are not relevant for most environments).
100.
▲
by
elil17
5mo ago
Non-western immigrants in the UAE are essentially enslaved. It is clearly in a camp which is separate from mere "strict immigration laws." The UAE and the US (as of the last year and a half) don't (just) have strict immigrati
101.
▲
by
elil17
5mo ago
I would say that #1 is almost self evidently true (I mean, obviously it's not because so many people disagree). It seems obvious to me that there is no moral reason that some people should only be allowed to live in certain places.
102.
▲
by
elil17
5mo ago
PTT isn't the issue. It's their intended use case.
103.
▲
by
elil17
5mo ago
Why the AI voice assistant? What? Is this perhaps a prank? That doesn't line up with the ethos of the Flipper Zero
104.
▲
by
elil17
5mo ago
People who think we can't afford socialized healthcare and people who love military airshows would stereotypically be the same people
105.
▲
by
elil17
5mo ago
> A company can value it's services as it chooses. If the work is performed for $1 or $5000 the government doesn't get a say in that. That's simply not true. You may get a certain amount of leeway, but it has to be reasona
106.
▲
by
elil17
5mo ago
But what would it even mean for a model to actively work against you during training? It wouldn't have memory across multiple training steps.
107.
▲
by
elil17
5mo ago
How the hell would a model training run "defend against" this approach? What would that even mean?
108.
▲
by
elil17
5mo ago
How so?
109.
▲
by
elil17
5mo ago
Right, anti-competitive practices are where a business tries to limit competition. And dynamic pricing is anti-competitive because businesses are essentially algorithmically identifying customers whose business they don't need to compe
110.
▲
by
elil17
5mo ago
> In a competitive environment (which grocery stores are), this excess capital gets reinvested into beating the competition. That's not true though. Excess capital does not necessarily get reinvested in an efficient market. If that
111.
▲
by
elil17
5mo ago
Right, but: 1. Asimov wrote that because he needed robots to be indistinguishable from humans for plot reasons. 2. We do 99% of our tool use with our arms and hands. We are already very good at building robot arms. We are getting better at
112.
▲
by
elil17
5mo ago
I wonder whether this could be used to fine-tune image models to provide better outputs. Something like this: 1. Algorithmically generate a underdrawing (e.g. place numbers and shapes randomly in the underdrawing) 2. Algorithmically generat
113.
▲
by
elil17
5mo ago
The issue is that consumers who can pick better stores will get better prices, while those that can't will get gouged. Imagine someone who works multiple jobs and only has time to shop at the grocery store closest to them. The algorith
114.
▲
by
elil17
5mo ago
The point of personalized pricing, which is what this bill addresses, is to identify consumers who won't shop around and give them higher prices. You can't compete that away because the consumers being hurt aren't sensitive t
115.
▲
by
elil17
5mo ago
I simply do not understand why you would ever prefer a fully humanoid robot as opposed to a humanoid torso on some other locomotion system.
116.
▲
by
elil17
5mo ago
Grocery stores have tiny margins and that's great. Let's keep it that way, it benefits all consumers. One way to prevent them from expanding their margins is to ban so-called "dynamic pricing".
117.
▲
by
elil17
6mo ago
I understood this to mean that the ChatGPT output was technically correct, just hard to understand.
118.
▲
by
elil17
6mo ago
I think there's more nuance to it. The real asset is the models that are being created. Imagine this world: the bubble "pops" in a couple years. The GPUs stick around for a few more years after that. At the end, we pretty muc
119.
▲
by
elil17
6mo ago
The same article goes into additional detail: > Commercial squeezed orange juice is pasteurized and filtered before being evaporated under vacuum and heat. After removal of most of the water, this concentrate, about 65% sugar by weight,
120.
▲
by
elil17
6mo ago
Is there any reason to think that freshly squeezed juice is chemically different from, for example, frozen juice concentrate?
More ›