elicksaur

9 ms·

121.
by elicksaur 2y ago
Do you know of an example game I can play right now?
122.
by elicksaur 2y ago
Not the OP, but in my experience LLMs fail in ways that indicate they will never solve the problem. Stuck in loops, correct their mistakes with worse mistakes, hallucinating things that don’t exist and being unable to correct. Working on my
123.
by elicksaur 2y ago
Can you give an example of one of these problems for context?
124.
by elicksaur 2y ago
This is interesting since they claim it does well on STEM questions, which I’d assume would be a similar level of reasoning complexity for a human.
125.
by elicksaur 2y ago
The person you are replying to points this out. They make a distinction between developers and users. An end user on a monthly subscription plan doesn’t care about how much compute happens for their chat.
126.
by elicksaur 2y ago
What games have people made with ChatGPT? Do you have an example of a live, deployed game?
127.
by elicksaur 2y ago
chatgpt .com does not work at all without JavaScript enabled. For me, there are 11 network requests from sending 1 chat message. 2 appear to be related to the convo, /memories and /conversation. For an example of what he is talkin
128.
by elicksaur 2y ago
Microsoft has a system at current #3 spot on the Top500 list. It uses 14.4k Nividia H100s and got about 1/2 the flops of Frontier. It’s the fastest publicly disclosed. As far as private concerns, I feel like a “prove it” approach is va
129.
by elicksaur 2y ago
Minimal effort means something is trivial to copy. Googling the concept of your website, I see dozens of options and they all look similar. It’s a relatively simple site concept. I would suggest putting more effort into coming up with a mor
130.
by elicksaur 2y ago
Reproduction. The training claims were always tenuous under the law. If I save a copy of your code, I probably haven’t done anything wrong. If I make a slot machine that sometimes randomly sends someone else your code, I get in trouble when
131.
by elicksaur 2y ago
Commentors on any website aren’t a monolith. You’re making up some fictional person to be mad at.
132.
by elicksaur 2y ago
How does that mandate work? Do they just check if it’s turned on? How many suggestions get accepted?
133.
by elicksaur 2y ago
What’s the point of this argument? If the user you’re replying to has been on this site, they’ve probably seen this counterpoint before. “Aha!” They say, “I only realized my folly after the 25th time someone pointed out googling also takes
134.
by elicksaur 2y ago
Do you use stack overflow for every keystroke?
135.
by elicksaur 2y ago
>“Leaf Blower” means any device or machine used to blow or move leaves or other debris by means of air or other force. This ChatGPT definition is so vague that it includes rakes. That’s not a reasonable match to the law that was passed.
136.
by elicksaur 2y ago
Maybe it’s pervasive because it’s literally the architecture of these models?
137.
by elicksaur 2y ago
I usually try to think about what I’m going to say before I say it. My train of thought for this comment certainly did not start with “I usually”.
138.
by elicksaur 2y ago
> Like previous GPT models, the GPT-4 base model was trained to predict the next word in a document… https://openai.com/index/gpt-4-research/ What humans do is materially different than that. When someone asks
139.
by elicksaur 2y ago
>If you listen carefully it's almost always based on a lack of imagination. I actually find things to be the opposite. My skepticism comes from understanding that what LLMs do is token prediction. If the output that I want can be so
140.
by elicksaur 2y ago
I really don’t like the denigration of humanity to sell these products. The current state of LLMs is so far away on “reliability” than the average human that these marketing lines are insulting. It really seems like the tech-bro space hates
141.
by elicksaur 2y ago
Also a false equivalency. Current state-of-the-art is not “no spam filter”. When AI is useful, it won’t be a debate.
142.
by elicksaur 2y ago
The “Humans on average are bad at X, therefore it isn’t a problem that AI makes mistakes.” argument is getting tired. No, I’ve never personally fallen for a phishing scam. If my email marked a phishing email as “Priority”, I would be much m
143.
by elicksaur 2y ago
Defaults are powerful.
144.
by elicksaur 2y ago
It seems like your nuclear analogy might have an answer to the question. Take that theory that it could have been possible the nuclear chain reaction ignited the atmosphere. It seems like the worst-case predictions about AI are at that scal
145.
by elicksaur 2y ago
>Yes. It does so trivially >but in the process it breaks the CSS for larger screens. So, no, it doesn’t fix it trivially. Also isn’t correctly sized on iPhone 11 Safari.
146.
by elicksaur 2y ago
>I can't think of a single recent technology that was so widely adopted by tech and non-tech people alike, immediately integrated into day-to-day experience. This is not meant to be an offense, but you are in a bubble. The vast, vas
147.
by elicksaur 2y ago
Maybe AI summarized the document for the reporter.
148.
by elicksaur 2y ago
The article does a pretty good job outlining the actual legal rights of published content and how his statement is not supported by laws and precedent.
149.
by elicksaur 2y ago
Most people would read the first quote as totally aligned with the article’s title.
150.
by elicksaur 2y ago
> I reject simplistic binaries and They-ing altogether, it's incredibly boring and waste of everyone’s time. > I have a feeling there'll be near-religious holdouts Pick one! Something tells me that everyone you disagree with

More ›