eli

25 ms·

421.
by eli 3y ago
Yes, you have to build an app that runs on a device owned by someone with access to the album. Google Photos, by comparison, has a REST API.
422.
by eli 3y ago
Visionect makes some excellent eInk displays that take care of all the hardware for you. The tradeoff is they're not cheap.
423.
by eli 3y ago
The problem here is that iCloud is the proprietary crap. They don't offer an appropriate API to get photos out. It'd be easier if you were starting with pictures in something more accessible. That said, I think Aura frames will
424.
by eli 3y ago
Presumably you get your monthly fee back if not.
425.
by eli 3y ago
Google and Apple simply shouldn't be allowed to operate exclusive App Stores on their devices.
426.
by eli 3y ago
That seems unlikely to be something I'd ever encounter and solved by muting requests after too many in a row. Yes, a local attacker could DoS the convenience features for my guest wifi. That's fine.
427.
by eli 3y ago
It doesn't just mean that, actually.
428.
by eli 3y ago
Maybe you need a better lawyer. Good lawyer should talk to you for free to explain the process and see if you have a case worth pursuing. Also this is definitely free and they can decide to bring a lawsuit on your behalf https://
429.
by eli 3y ago
Fight with HR? No, they are breaking the law. You should talk to an employment lawyer. You could potentially get a cash settlement, force them to consider your application, or an injunction that would force them to treat future applicants b
430.
by eli 3y ago
Sounds like you're in California. I'd start by making sure you know your rights under their "Ban the Box" laws. In general I don't think an employer can ask about or consider a prior conviction until after they&#x27
431.
by eli 3y ago
Even if they didn't want to do 2FA for whatever reasons, there are things they could have done like checking password hashes against breaches.
432.
by eli 3y ago
think about it the other way: if someone who happens to use random ROM happens to be a target of a state security agency of course it would be trivial to infect and the other 999 users would be collateral damage.
433.
by eli 3y ago
That isn’t anywhere close to enough based on what I pay for power. I think you probably are always better off somewhere with plentiful cheap power (that likely isn’t where you want to live)
434.
by eli 3y ago
The cheap ones on Craigslist are scams though
435.
by eli 3y ago
What's stopping people from creating these hobbyists sites now? Or you from using them?
436.
by eli 3y ago
It depends where you live, but usually ID check + signature
437.
by eli 3y ago
It's the same process for any amount up to the limit.
438.
by eli 3y ago
Does Apple?
439.
by eli 3y ago
The legal standard for a subpoena from a federal agency is "reasonably relevant to an authorized investigation." As determined by the agency itself. That's an incredibly low bar. And if pharmacies respond to subpoena without
440.
by eli 3y ago
Story that led to the retraction was by the team here at Retail Dive https://www.retaildive.com/news/retailers-crime-problem-numb...
441.
by eli 3y ago
That certainly happens but it’s not the only way to go private or even the only playbook for PE
442.
by eli 3y ago
Cell carriers did the same thing up until the iPhone. That wasn't quite a full and free market, but there were at least a competitors and they all did it because they could.
443.
by eli 3y ago
This is true, but even with all that taken into account taxes on the very wealthy are lower now than they were then.
444.
by eli 3y ago
> better and cheaper than the $750 going to drugs or alcohol? It didn't. That was one of the conclusions of the study being discussed. At the risk of stating the obvious: someone who's homeless may need medical treatment or, yo
445.
by eli 3y ago
I'm confused. Are you interested in evidence-backed policies that get people off the street? Or not?
446.
by eli 3y ago
"Food credits" are an expensive and paternalistic Big Government approach to the problem. Is the idea that poor people don't know they need to buy food? Or that the government knows what you should be eating better than you d
447.
by eli 3y ago
Well an obvious difference is that one directly removes executives who were responsible. But sure, I'm amenable to a sufficiently large fine. Even just allowing class action lawsuits (despite their flaws) would be a lot better than the
448.
by eli 3y ago
Why do you think that's the only way this can work? When a bank fails, the FDIC typically facilitates new ownership over the course of a weekend. The workers still have jobs and the branches reopen on Monday. The top executives are out
449.
by eli 3y ago
Not the connection, just the company administering and profiting from it.
450.
by eli 3y ago
And it should be punitive. The point isn't just to compensate me for the harm I suffered

More ›