elashri

25 ms·

541.
by elashri 2y ago
Thanks for bringing that up to me. I did not include the largest gaming market and it seems more plausible now this the OP estimations make sense. Edit: I missed that you are the same commenter that I replied. sorry about that
542.
by elashri 2y ago
I will start by agreeing that usage of "war" seems weired. Although scientific drama in fundamental physics is not uncommon but a word like "debate" would be more appropriate. I don't like your usage of word "I
543.
by elashri 2y ago
According to the latest study [1] estimating how much money cheat developers make annually it is an upper limit of ~ $75M. I would say that the very liberal estimation of anti cheating efforts will cost maybe $100M annually. That does not i
544.
by elashri 2y ago
> the lack of deviations from it makes it hard for experiments to point in a useful direction for better theories to be developed along. We have anomalies (deviations from standard model) in many measurements done by several experiments.
545.
GitHub Copilot is now available in Windows Terminal(github.blog)
3 points by elashri 2y ago|0 comments
546.
by elashri 2y ago
> this approach assumes the neutrality of the underlying legislation My approach doesn't assume anything, it just trying to identify potential biases and conflict of interest. This is somehow similar of scientific publications (in i
547.
by elashri 2y ago
I got into the habit of reviewing the the background of people critiquing particular policy (or advocate for one). In this case the author has very interesting participation in "Special Competitive Studies Project" which describe
548.
by elashri 2y ago
I'm like you but have somehow different set - AdguardHome - Traefik - Cloudflare tunnels - Home Assistant - onedev (Nice simple one user git host) - Immich - Vaultwarden - Coder - IT-tools - Linkding - Clibre/Calibre Web - Booksta
549.
by elashri 2y ago
The main and best model according to many is Claude 3.5. But it provides maximum of 200k [1]. While I understand cost effectiveness and other limitations with embeddings. But maximum context of just 5% is probably too low with any standard.
550.
by elashri 2y ago
My problem with all AI code assistants is usually the context. I am not sure how cursor fare in this regard but I always struggle to feed the model enough of the code project to be useful for me on a level more than providing line per line
551.
by elashri 2y ago
I think Mathpix API [1] can use used to do something like that in realtime/ish [1] https://mathpix.com/
552.
by elashri 2y ago
From a quick visit to his profile (linked website), he is a physicist. This technology setup is very complicated and against the eternal usage of blackboard in a typical physics department. And to be honest this applies to his suggestion as
553.
by elashri 2y ago
I take a guess it is flagged because it the article itself does not give details on the situation and some of the comments are horrible. People are coming up with scenarios about being arrested if you own iPhone 16 while the situation is th
554.
Can computers think? No. They can't do anything(aeon.co)
5 points by elashri 2y ago|0 comments
555.
Transforming Particles Are Probably Here to Stay(4gravitons.com)
1 points by elashri 2y ago|0 comments
556.
Journals with high rates of suspicious papers flagged by science-integrity tool(nature.com)
4 points by elashri 2y ago|0 comments
557.
by elashri 2y ago
I would like a chance to jump into this point because this problem is a function of two things. The throughput that you can make your Tigger (Data acquisition system) save the data and transfer it to permanent storage. This is usually invlo
558.
by elashri 2y ago
Ironically, some physicists (specially maintaining webpage for their project on CERN) might actually have to tweak the button sometimes. But usually they rarely do it and usually without being asked /s.
559.
by elashri 2y ago
They are not taught because of two things. First it just philosophical opinions and the second is that it does not matter when you are actually working with quantum mechanics/ quantum field theory. So it is usually outside the realm of
560.
by elashri 2y ago
I understand that this is valid for stationary solution which is what an astronomical black hole would be most of the time. What I don't get is why do you assume that this would violate causality. In GR the idea that changes must “inst
561.
by elashri 2y ago
What is unique about your thoughts experiment that makes it applies only to dynamical phases? I am really not getting what you are trying to say?
562.
by elashri 2y ago
The parameter space is usually (not only) a two dimensional plot of mass and the coupling force parameter. Those can give you a space that you would want to explore. There will be no one experiment that would give you sensitivity in all the
563.
by elashri 2y ago
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" William Wright [1] [1] https://quoteinvestigator.com/2019/09/17/absence/
564.
by elashri 2y ago
The no-hair theorem (scientific term for what you are descriping) essentially states that black holes can be completely described by only three externally observable classical properties: mass, charge, and angular momentum. The internal dis
565.
by elashri 2y ago
> We’ve no way to detect dark matter directly, and so no way to prove or disprove this hypothesis We can and we are already searching for dark matter directly [1] and indirectly [2]. The phase space is being closed every now and then and
566.
by elashri 2y ago
> above the origin of a supermassive black hole I spent couple of minutes trying to understand your thought experiment and was puzzled why can't I understand it. It seems that it is probably because I don't understand what you
567.
by elashri 2y ago
I know that this is in the context of the US. But for once lets do the other way around. At tue beginning of 2024 i went to stay a couple of months with my family in Egypt. The internet plans there is caped by default, you can't get un
568.
My NumPy year: Creating a DType for the next generation of scientific computing(quansight.com)
96 points by elashri 2y ago|15 comments
569.
by elashri 2y ago
I actually had some hopes that this particular court would make the first win for Sci-hub against publishers. But it seems this is very optimistic (not to mention dragging for years now).
570.
by elashri 2y ago
> With exceptions for cosmological process like the expansion of the universe that we really don't purport to understand That's not accurate, expansion of the universe (that the standard model of cosmology describes) does not

More ›