eithed

8 ms·

61.
by eithed 4mo ago
I was working in an env where I started to suspect that people I was chatting with were using LLMs. These were people that didn't want to talk to me either way, so there was not much lost here. I suspected that, because the technical e
62.
by eithed 4mo ago
Yes :D In Poland you would just say Hej! = I acknowledge you being there but I don't want to chat. But again, back to the point I was trying to make - the intent behind these sort of questions (and answers) can be cultural
63.
by eithed 4mo ago
Brits will either say "Fine, thanks" or not respond at all. Poles will tell you that yesterday they went to visit their relatives, and now they're tired, or that their cat is sick, or that they having problems with something.
64.
by eithed 4mo ago
I'd appreciate if they'd not mark the incident as resolved when there's still fallout - ie: my commits didn't display on the branch, my actions didn't run It's the same issue as the other day - display message
65.
by eithed 4mo ago
It might be cultural as well; I'm Polish and living in UK made me change my habits of answering "How are you?" questions. Same with Dutch from my experience - there are cultures where people say what's on their mind with
66.
by eithed 4mo ago
No worries! Here's the full prompt if you need it: https://sharetext.io/g6ibuxa5 (you'll probably need to update it, as there're specific things I wanted it to take into account) Ultimately my point is to def
67.
by eithed 4mo ago
I think that this not only applies to languages, but general patterns that you use. Don't mix functional with OO. Don't mix repositories with DAOs. Don't mix MVC and MVVM. Code should be predictable in what it does and what y
68.
by eithed 4mo ago
I assume compacting is the sleep here; so, yes
69.
by eithed 4mo ago
Client network timeout shouldn't result in 500. With 408 and retry you should, dependent on the business criteria, get either an upsert (transaction is retried) or 422 (validation that given entry already exists). Even if it's &qu
70.
by eithed 4mo ago
I have a skill for exactly such case! Here's an excerpt :) ``` --- name: evidence-debugging description: > Use when debugging any failing test or bug, investigating unexpected behavior, or tracing the cause of a reported defect.
71.
by eithed 4mo ago
That will not work - you end up with Claude being ADHD and not following any guidelines. Skills do work, as they ground the agent with constrained context for the task it's performing
72.
by eithed 5mo ago
That's the model I've arrived to as well: - first I've created a skill how the architecture of the system should look like - I'll tell the LLM to follow the guidelines; it will not do that 100%, but it will be good enoug
73.
by eithed 5mo ago
Maybe one or two in an ocean of crap. And even the ones I do see which are interesting I start despising, because I will see them hundreds of times. Base44 - I will never use your services because of the ad bombardment. Same with that fucki
74.
by eithed 5mo ago
Can't you regex that given string contains just numbers and then use any of the provided methods? Then check if the returning value is a number to cater for edge cases Ok, having a method to do that for you would be nice, but the post
75.
by eithed 5mo ago
With google search you don't get money for creating content as people rely on summary provided by the search. Imagine people would go to youtube and watch previews of your videos solely; or the preview is your video, but condensed and
76.
by eithed 5mo ago
+ can you even define what is Photoshop? What capabilities does Photoshop have? Ignoring all the edge cases that it supports, what Photoshop allows you to do?
77.
by eithed 5mo ago
Some feedback: - not providing examples how the app works makes me not inclined at all to download this - not mentioning anything about being limited to US makes me angry to have wasted my time trying to even try this out
78.
by eithed 5mo ago
I ask Claude to fix given test: - runs the test what is failing | grep "x|failing" | tail 10 - runs the test again to get the why it's failing message | tail 10 - runs the test again because tail 10 cut off the message every
79.
by eithed 5mo ago
> Chrome doesn't. For ages when visiting YouTube it wasn't possible to mute the YouTube tab - the mute button was disabled and it was the only website where I've seen such behaviour; just checked, and it's now entirel
80.
by eithed 5mo ago
Loss of trust towards US is one factor; another is enshittification of services; yet another are good enough monopolies that EU don't have capital to disrupt
81.
by eithed 5mo ago
> not [...] how they should work So that we're on the same page, what I think should be PM responsibilities: If I have a user story: "As a customer I want to purchase a product so that I can receive it at my address" - PM
82.
by eithed 5mo ago
This might be an indicator that PM isn't doing their job; PM should be able to answer you questions regarding what the business wants (= people who you're trying to serve). Developers, by the nature of interacting with domain, do
83.
by eithed 5mo ago
Think the issue is not with named parameters per se, but with mixing domain logic = there are two different user creation flows, that should be doing two different things (or mostly different things), but are guarded with boolean flag. As a
84.
by eithed 5mo ago
Contributing factors are entirely serious edit: actually more and more thing I'm recognizing as being entirely serious (ie benelovent worms :D); satire indistinguishable from reality
85.
by eithed 5mo ago
Good thing that Trump is bringing disillusion regarding America; same for brexit regarding UK
86.
by eithed 5mo ago
Ah, Norton Commander takes me back
87.
by eithed 5mo ago
I think that educators go to the bank account example, because it is easy to explain + (I suspect) non-modifyable bank ledger with add-only transactions is the source of this pattern. In real world I've applied event sourcing to follow
88.
by eithed 5mo ago
Are neural networks, trained to perform a single task, intelligent by such definition?
89.
by eithed 5mo ago
I think this is nothing new and comes down to just working with people, even without LLMs - many times I found myself puzzled by "what does this code do that was merged in by this person without my approval?"; without specs and do
90.
by eithed 5mo ago
> people generally don't (or simply can't) scrutinize their system Is this true? I generally like to read the thought process of the LLM and, if it starts going in circles, correct its behaviour. It's frustrating, because

More ›