eipi10_hn

7 ms·

91.
by eipi10_hn 2y ago
> Another attack vector is public DNS names that resolve to local IPs as well, like "lvh.me". uBO LAN list blocks those as well, only except strict 1st-party connections, i.e if `lvh.me` is used as connections on other domains
92.
by eipi10_hn 2y ago
No, but when Advertising becomes - Spywares to fingerprint and track people, - Non-moderated minefields of scams, phishing and malwares, then yes.
93.
by eipi10_hn 2y ago
You do you. We are not the legal entities who are the ones that will decide the final understanding of those legal words. If anyone thinks Firefox processes the data with "nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide license" outside of
94.
by eipi10_hn 2y ago
Yes, their rights have 2 parts in their paragraph: 1. The data processed described in the Privacy Notice, 2. A nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide license for the purpose of doing as you request with the content you input in Firefox. The
95.
by eipi10_hn 2y ago
Yes, we all know that. But the ones that "don't want" to know that are the lawyers and the legal entities. Whatever we scream down here, Mozilla Corporation is the one who will face those legal confrontations, and whatever we
96.
by eipi10_hn 2y ago
> a web browser's job does not require anything remotely resembling a copyright license from the user to the browser vendor. Yes, I know that, you know that, we all know that. This has always been our implicit agreements between us
97.
by eipi10_hn 2y ago
Yeah, legal words are frustrating like that. When the law comes to their house, using "acting purely as a user agent and sending data" will just help them on reddit but not on court. And no, you don't always send the data to
98.
by eipi10_hn 2y ago
> not downloaded software Tbf, any softwares that send your input to an external (like browsers...) should disclose like this too. The thing that sends those data is your software, not you. Otherwise, after you click on the button "
99.
by eipi10_hn 2y ago
Thank you. > As soon as I can port over core functionality to a custom desktop renderer things will go from being 10x faster (currently) to 1000x faster (the end goal). That sounds like quite difficult job? Do you know any other projects
100.
by eipi10_hn 2y ago
Thanks a lot for your project. Have you compared the speed with JPEGView?
101.
by eipi10_hn 2y ago
Every time there's this kind of news, there's always other comments with similar news: https://x.com/alexrozanski/status/1881043544204599330 (or https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitwarden&#x
102.
by eipi10_hn 2y ago
> Those corporations with MBAs will find another way Not YouTube. Those "nonsense" are from World Wide Web Consortium, users are just doing what they say. The "hipster" are the ones not respecting those Ethical Web Pr
103.
by eipi10_hn 2y ago
ABP didn't even address any trackings with their program. It's just pure cosmetics. > Really their users just didn't want to see any ads at all Because the internet was filled with malicious ads before any content blockers
104.
by eipi10_hn 2y ago
Because you cannot even control your ads to users? No one of you devs gets punishment for tracking users' personal information, pushing scam, phishing and malware to users, and now users are not even allowed to protect themselves? User
105.
The Badware filter is one of the most useful filters(old.reddit.com)
4 points by eipi10_hn 2y ago|0 comments
106.
by eipi10_hn 2y ago
If I'm not wrong, DNT is not backed by laws. GPC can https://www.eff.org/gpc-privacy-badger
107.
by eipi10_hn 2y ago
Apparently. We should open gofundme for Google.
108.
by eipi10_hn 2y ago
It's actually another hoop for users: - Safari + Kagi: you just need a default browser and a non-default search - Orion + Kagi: you just need a non-default browser and a default search - Firefox + Kagi: you need a non-default browser a
109.
by eipi10_hn 2y ago
Hmm... Interesting. I tested on Kagi and it appeared at No. 13 for me. Not too bad, but compared to proton, it's quite easy for people to ignore.
110.
by eipi10_hn 3y ago
My ISP is from communist country and my VPN is Mullvad. Guess.
111.
by eipi10_hn 3y ago
What lie?
112.
by eipi10_hn 3y ago
GDPR is not just for business that "sells data". Like the above said, you would need a GDPR expert consultant to go through your whole process. It will also correlate to your country's law, not something "you can do what
113.
by eipi10_hn 3y ago
On iOS it is not simple to switch to other search engines on Safari that's not in their list: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38937619 The thing is they can't control the stability of alternative methods on S
114.
by eipi10_hn 3y ago
I agree. My look about HN for privacy-focused topics changed after YouTube's blocker war. I realized there are many privacy-truder-tech workers here, and their comments were largely structured smartly to lighten how awful those "t
115.
by eipi10_hn 3y ago
It's even more limited than MV3, let alone MV2
116.
by eipi10_hn 3y ago
Hmm... For example which sites?
117.
by eipi10_hn 3y ago
> Nowadays I open Aegis and I have > 20 services there, and trying to look for my code between all the running numbers is a pain. I just click search and type 2-3 characters and most of the time I can see what I need right away. I&#x2
118.
by eipi10_hn 3y ago
Nope
119.
by eipi10_hn 3y ago
Ah, I thought it's related to uBO.
120.
by eipi10_hn 3y ago
And if rendering contents as client users want is unethical, that authority section won't ever need to exist.

More ›