Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
eipi10_hn
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
31.
▲
by
eipi10_hn
6mo ago
Ah yeah, after accusing others that they vibe-code without proofs, no apology and steering the accusations to other things?
32.
▲
by
eipi10_hn
6mo ago
LMFAO. Brave uses uBO's lists and filters, including trusted filters which have much more capabilities with much more risks to your sites' data and they allow that on all other lists too (even uBO only allows their own lists as tr
33.
▲
by
eipi10_hn
6mo ago
Because Windows doesn't go open-source and others can't build their OS from windows like chromium. With OS, there are no open source kernels that are actively maintained and security-fix bump every month by full time staff of gian
34.
▲
by
eipi10_hn
6mo ago
No. Thunderbird has its own merits and they work without Firefox. Mozilla has credibilities in e-mail because of Thunderbird. This topic has 0 relations to Firefox.
35.
▲
by
eipi10_hn
6mo ago
Yes, it's unrelated. Each one has its own resources and roadmaps. They are totally not dependent on each other. Thunderbird and its roadmaps/projects are not affected by Firefox' earnings at all. One's development doesn&
36.
▲
by
eipi10_hn
6mo ago
> Half the thread impunes Mozilla for taking so much money from Google and imply that they are controlled opposition, and the other half gets upset when Mozilla doesn't implement every standard that Google tries to steamroll through
37.
▲
by
eipi10_hn
6mo ago
> Half the thread impunes Mozilla for taking so much money from Google and imply that they are controlled opposition, and the other half gets upset when Mozilla doesn't implement every standard that Google tries to steamroll through
38.
▲
by
eipi10_hn
6mo ago
LMFAO. You web devs just want more tools to fingerprint and track users. When Firefox raises privacy concerns for your spyware tools, you play like victims and say that "Firefox doesn't want better for users". F that.
39.
▲
by
eipi10_hn
6mo ago
LMFAO. Containers are not for profiles-purpose. Everyone who needs profiles know this. And Firefox now needs 2 click to switch profiles.
40.
▲
by
eipi10_hn
6mo ago
Yeah, you don't speak for me.
41.
▲
by
eipi10_hn
6mo ago
I don't care about benchmarks.
42.
▲
by
eipi10_hn
6mo ago
Thunderbird is under MZLA Technologies Corporation, their money and resources are unrelated to Mozilla Corporation, who pays money for their Firefox.
43.
▲
by
eipi10_hn
6mo ago
Why do you know that nobody asks for? Are you in the team?
44.
▲
by
eipi10_hn
6mo ago
Why is this related to Firefox?
45.
▲
by
eipi10_hn
6mo ago
Why is this related to Firefox?
46.
▲
by
eipi10_hn
6mo ago
Why is this related to Firefox?
47.
▲
by
eipi10_hn
6mo ago
And?
48.
▲
by
eipi10_hn
6mo ago
[flagged]
49.
▲
by
eipi10_hn
7mo ago
Yeah, anything happening in backend depends totally on the extensions. Unless I need something, I rarely use extensions that are closed-source or open-source but has some sending data in their features.
50.
▲
by
eipi10_hn
7mo ago
It's `searching your computer`, period. The extensions are part of my computer. They don't exist in my refrigerator. > Nowhere have I defended what LinkedIn is doing. Yep. You feel the same taste of your own. You are accusing t
51.
▲
by
eipi10_hn
7mo ago
This only happens if the extension puts their `moz-extension://` links into the DOM. It's different to chrome case where extensions can be detected regardless of being activated on that site or not.
52.
▲
by
eipi10_hn
7mo ago
Page can know what your chrome extensions are, even when your extensions don't interact with the site, by fetching `web_accessible_resources`: https://browserleaks.com/chrome#web-accessible-resources-det... . uBO mitig
53.
▲
by
eipi10_hn
7mo ago
Calling out the fingerprinting users' extensions is not hyperbolic. Defending that action is.
54.
▲
by
eipi10_hn
7mo ago
I'm happy to see that day. I'm already paying for stuff I need in life. There's no reasons to insist on not paying for the stuff I need in the web. Just kill those spywares stealing my personal actions and information.
55.
▲
by
eipi10_hn
7mo ago
Parents can hold the keys for underaged?
56.
▲
by
eipi10_hn
7mo ago
Maybe sourcehut? https://sourcehut.org
57.
▲
by
eipi10_hn
7mo ago
The bust joke is natural for me when 2 total different species encounter at a more friendly interaction level (after their first interactions). The humor in this is no way Deadpool level. I'm saying this as a hater of Deadpool because
58.
▲
by
eipi10_hn
7mo ago
Read Firefox' stance of these APIs about users' privacy. Chromium gives 0 sh*t about users' privacy, and just pump the APIs out for websites to track their users more easily.
59.
▲
by
eipi10_hn
7mo ago
Opera, Edge and Samsung run Chromium. They don't use their own "rendering engine".
60.
▲
by
eipi10_hn
7mo ago
You didn't answer his question at all. > Which browser engine ? There's no Firefox engine, there's Gecko engine. That's the core of Firefox' extension APIs. Now, tell me how do you implement `webRequest.filterRe
More ›