eigenket

12 ms·

31.
by eigenket 2y ago
Ok I think I understand your intention with the code now. Sorry I was wrong before. I think what you're talking about here is what gets called the "detection loophole" in most of the literatire. The idea that if we detect onl
32.
by eigenket 2y ago
If I understand correctly what your script is doing, it emphatically does not meet the challenge I gave above (specifically it fails the "but the state is local" part of your comment). This is because of the post-selection on line
33.
by eigenket 2y ago
I guarantee you can't break (for example) the CHSH inequality [1] with such a set-up (assuming I've understood your description of what you're proposing), and encourage you to try (with similar python script). An easy formula
34.
by eigenket 2y ago
I think its more likely this is just an easy way to trick this model. It's seen lots of riddles, so when it's sees something that looks like a riddle but isn't one it gets confused.
35.
by eigenket 2y ago
"When the doctor sees the boy he says" Indicates the gender of the father.
36.
by eigenket 2y ago
The text says "When the doctor sees the boy he says" The doctor is male, and also a parent of the child.
37.
by eigenket 2y ago
Ah yeah, if you're not trying to identify all loops but just check if some loops exist then that works. I think you can dispense with the "walking around taking clockwise/anticlockwise edges" part though. If you repeated
38.
by eigenket 2y ago
Everything up to the [spoiler ahead] in this comment is (as far as I can tell) exactly how things work in standard formulations of Bell's inequality. There's nothing weird or crackpot there. Your numerical code is impossible for
39.
by eigenket 2y ago
If I understand your algorithm correctly I think it fails on this graph (drawn on my phone, using an online implementation of Paint). https://imgur.com/a/ihPrwrX I think this is roughly the counterexample the person ab
40.
by eigenket 2y ago
> You've got to reframe the problem so that Bell's theorem doesn't apply. When you build your theory, if you manage to define what a measurement is, so that you don't satisfy the hypothesis of the Bell's theorem,
41.
by eigenket 2y ago
You can probably define locality in a way that MWI is nonlocal, but you can also definitely define it in a way such that MWI is local. For me the most important thing about nonlocality is the lack of any "action at a distance", MW
42.
by eigenket 2y ago
Will you grant me that it is at least possible to derive Bell's inequality by listing out a complete set of assumptions (including assumptions that define what a measurement is and what observations are)? Of course you personally may d
43.
by eigenket 2y ago
> Hint : Listing the assumptions doesn't work Why not? I could see that it might not if you are not clear about your assumptions
44.
by eigenket 2y ago
> You usually show a pupil the problem with classical probabilities, and show that you can't violate Bell's Inequalities, then you show that Quantum Mechanics managed to replicated the observed probabilities using a non-local w
45.
by eigenket 2y ago
You know something has gone horrifically badly when a paper begins with > This reply paper should be read as a continuation of my previous reply paper [1], which is a reply published in this journal to a previous critique of one of my pa
46.
by eigenket 2y ago
The sun's core is overwhelmingly composed of helium and hydrogen, with about 1% oxygen and about %1 everything else. At least according to the standard model, I don't know how much "wiggle room" there is in our understan
47.
by eigenket 2y ago
What's the main thing that this new website adds over scirate?
48.
by eigenket 2y ago
It sounds like what you want is scirate. As far as I understand from this post this new thing is just scirate but lacking the interface you're talking about here.
49.
by eigenket 2y ago
> Does continuity implies differentiability? For almost all practical cases yes, but when you want to be general, thats when you get the Weierstrass function [1], a weird function Ok I have to jump in and disagree with you. Non-different
50.
by eigenket 2y ago
> I’m unable to comprehend how you got to that assumption. Because you conflate art in public spaces with the use of images like Jennifer in selling software. To me it seems obvious that these are fundamentally not the same.
51.
by eigenket 2y ago
The feelings & wishes of the model are the most important, but also important is the impact on people (especially women) in the field, as the links I posted earlier point out, this impact is generally quite negative.
52.
by eigenket 2y ago
I don't find the Lenna image particularly erotic? I guess shes showing her shoulder which might be particularly risqué where you're from? Certainly for me the Jennifer image is at least comparable.
53.
by eigenket 2y ago
I think you're assuming that the way people interact with something is independent of its context. The impact of (to take a random example) a university having a statue of Venus or whatever in the grounds, is not the same as having the
54.
by eigenket 2y ago
Theres pretty much exactly as much that is sexual about the Lenna image. Its still not appropriate in the workplace or in research. For a start using images like this has obvious and widely negative impacts on women entering your field htt
55.
by eigenket 2y ago
Ok...you want a scenario where an image of an attractive young woman was shared and used extensively by members of a male dominated field and where women involved in the field have told us what they think of it? Oh yeah, I've heard tha
56.
by eigenket 2y ago
Nothing in this paper is actually new. Its a review. In general understanding various uncertainty principles is pretty foundational in engineering quantum things, for example transistors. They're also an essential part of how we unders
57.
by eigenket 2y ago
Yeah it's an editing error. Looks like originally they wrote the theorem down for R^n and later decided to just stick to R.
58.
by eigenket 2y ago
> The question is - is it you or Michelangelo who is the problem? Clearly in the context of my comment its neither. Its whoever is bringing the naked statues into my workplace. This (to me) is such a blindingly obvious third option that
59.
by eigenket 2y ago
Heads must roll has two meanings to me 1. The original meaning is that people must be killed. 2. The more common meaning these days is that people must be punished in some less dramatic way (usually fired). It is typical of racists to use p
60.
by eigenket 2y ago
There are essentially two "easy" ways to add neutrino mass to the standard model without breaking things too much. One is to use the Higgs to give neutrinos mass. For technical reasons this only works if there are both right and l

More ›