ehutch79

47 ms·

871.
by ehutch79 7y ago
It really does need more screenshots and obvious 'in use' videos and photos
872.
by ehutch79 7y ago
This. so much this.
873.
by ehutch79 7y ago
Yes. Problem solved, you can send me the remainder of your research grants now.
874.
by ehutch79 7y ago
https://developer.apple.com/videos/play/wwdc2019/702/
875.
by ehutch79 7y ago
https://developer.apple.com/system-extensions/
876.
by ehutch79 7y ago
I don't really see the issue. If you're already storing all your code on a third party service, why is it suddenly horrible that they're doing event tracking on the use of the service? If you REALLY cared, wouldn't you b
877.
by ehutch79 7y ago
You are correct.
878.
by ehutch79 7y ago
I agree with the last bit about how writing advice can be overdone. The slavish adherence to the hero's journey, aka the monomyth, is painful sometimes. When you start recognizing 'the rejection of the call' when the main cha
879.
by ehutch79 7y ago
My understanding of 'show, don't tell' is that instead of just telling the reader; he was nervous you show it through the prose like this; He hesitated. Wringing his hands together, shifting from foot to foot. "I... I do
880.
by ehutch79 7y ago
v2 object syntax is supoosed to be staying
881.
by ehutch79 7y ago
This is pure FUD. You can already write a render method. In vue 3 the use case will be the same and most people will be using template tags in their single file components same as today. The big change is that the availability of a new js a
882.
by ehutch79 7y ago
yeeeaaaaahhhh. 'its just a joke' is already a thing...
883.
by ehutch79 7y ago
If amazon is any indication, this is how you review a novel: ------------ 1 star! Worst vacuum cleaner ever. Wouldn't get dirt out of anything ------------ 3 stars Insert in depth literary analysis commenting on grammar, boring plot, a
884.
by ehutch79 7y ago
To be fair, 90% of the time i see people recommend JWT for auth, it's a session token inside a jwt in a cookie, which then gets decoded and checked against the db in the backend
885.
by ehutch79 7y ago
https://github.com/cdr/code-server
886.
by ehutch79 7y ago
It's not.... Yet there was a post about how specifically to do that on dev.to because their users couldn't tell their modal was a modal, and the solution they came up with was to hijack the back button.
887.
by ehutch79 7y ago
I keep seeing stuff like this and wonder where the actual advantage to graphQL is?
888.
by ehutch79 7y ago
It's super dependant on the app. however, abstracting your api calls to a single library is helpful for any app beyond the most simple todo app. Things like the current user are 100% global state. A list of user settings, or valid valu
889.
by ehutch79 7y ago
My guess is that tutorials and whatnot don't include, upfront or at all, a section on when to actually use redux. It's really easy to get the feeling EVERYTHING needs to go into global state management, from variables used once in
890.
by ehutch79 7y ago
You'd honestly be better off rewriting it. And if that's a huge ask, you need to seriously reconsider what is 'global state' in your app. You state management shouldn't really have all your api calls in it. Especial
891.
by ehutch79 7y ago
feel free to
892.
by ehutch79 7y ago
False equivalence. You planning 'how to put fuel in a nulean aircraft carrier'. For most software projects the equivalent question being asked is 'can you put some fuel in this thing we have'. When asking things like
893.
by ehutch79 7y ago
Evan You is responding to comments on twitter https://twitter.com/youyuxi/status/1137567675356291072
894.
by ehutch79 7y ago
It's important to note that this is an RFC for 3.x, and they seem to want to provide it for a 2.x revision, and provide a compatibility build, so it's not like angular 2+ where there's no real migration path. If you have comm
895.
by ehutch79 7y ago
Soooo... an automated script flagged them. they get themselves unflagged, and proceed to do the same thing immediately. without any real confirmation that they wouldn't be flagged again. They've basically been flagged as abusing t
896.
by ehutch79 7y ago
Why? what's the actual issue? If you have access to it, wouldn't you know the id anyways?
897.
by ehutch79 7y ago
the /dec/1235 bit was a typo. I mean really?
898.
by ehutch79 7y ago
Yes, it was a typo
899.
by ehutch79 7y ago
Also, what about when your users are all generating multiple entries with the same name/slug? thing-name-1532 isn't any easier than things/1532/thing-name I have no reason to enforce uniqueness of the name of things, but
900.
by ehutch79 7y ago
I don't understand why people are saying this is a security issue. If user a has private document 1234 at /doc/1234 and user b has private document 1235 at /doc/1235 when user a goes to /dec/1235

More ›